The iPeer2Peer Program: a pilot randomized controlled trial in adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Jennifer Stinson, Sara Ahola Kohut, Paula Forgeron, Khush Amaria, Mary Bell, Miriam Kaufman, Nadia Luca, Stephanie Luca, Lauren Harris, Charles Victor, Lynn Spiegel, Jennifer Stinson, Sara Ahola Kohut, Paula Forgeron, Khush Amaria, Mary Bell, Miriam Kaufman, Nadia Luca, Stephanie Luca, Lauren Harris, Charles Victor, Lynn Spiegel

Abstract

Background: Adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) are at risk for physical, emotional, social and role challenges that negatively impact quality of life. Peer mentoring has been shown to improve positive health behaviours in adolescents with chronic disease while simultaneously providing social support. The objectives of this paper are to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an online peer mentoring program (iPeer2Peer Program) for adolescents with JIA.

Methods: The iPeer2Peer program was examined using a waitlist pilot randomized control trial (RCT). Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention or wait-list control group via a secure, web-based randomization service. Health care providers and investigators were blinded to participant group allocation. Trained peer mentors (16-25 years; successfully managing their JIA) were matched to participants (12-18 years; diagnosed with JIA) randomized to the intervention group to provide peer support and education for effective self-management of JIA. Participant-mentor pairings connected ten times over 8 weeks using Skype video calls. Primary outcomes focused on implementation (i.e. measures of feasibility and acceptability). Secondary outcomes focused on effectiveness (i.e. measures of self-management, self-efficacy, pain, social support and quality of life).

Results: Thirty adolescents (mean age 14.3 ± 1.7 years, 97 % female) completed the RCT (intervention n = 16, control n = 14).

Primary outcomes: One third (32 %) of adolescents approached agreed to participate, completed baseline measures and were randomized. Half of pairings completed ten calls within 8 weeks. Average call length was twice the required amount with call lengths of 44.72 ± 15.76 min. Participants reported satisfaction with the program and all reported that they would recommend it to their peers. Participants' mean engagement level with the program was 8.53/10 (range = 7-10).

Secondary outcomes: Participants who completed the iPeer2Peer Program demonstrated improvements in their perceived ability to manage JIA (p < 0.04), compared to controls. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: The iPeer2Peer Program is a promising intervention that improves acceptability of self-management and peer support treatments for adolescents with JIA. By using the Internet to connect mentors to adolescents with JIA it may also improve accessibility to these resources. Findings will be used to adapt the program and refine the methodology for a full-scale RCT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01986400 . Registered November 11, 2013.

Keywords: Adolescents; Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis; Randomized controlled trial; Social support.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Topics discussed during ipeer2peer program video calls

References

    1. Sacks JJ, Helmick CG, Luo YH, Ilowite NT, Bowyer S. Prevalence of and annual ambulatory health care visits for pediatric arthritis and other rheumatologic conditions in the United States in 2001–2004. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1439–45. doi: 10.1002/art.23087.
    1. Reiter-Purtill J, Gerhardt CA, Vannatta K, Passo MH, Noll RB. A controlled longitudinal study of the social functioning of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Ped Psychol. 2003;28(1):17–28. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/28.1.17.
    1. Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Fautrel B, Clarke AE, Duffy CM, Penrod JR. What is the impact of adolescent arthritis and rheumatism? Evidence from a national sample of Canadians. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(2):354–61.
    1. Schanberg LE, Gil KM, Anthony KK, Yow E, Rochon J. Pain, stiffness, and fatigue in juvenile polyarticular arthritis: contemporaneous stressful events and mood as predictors. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1196–204. doi: 10.1002/art.20952.
    1. Margetić B, Aukst-Margetić B, Bilić E, Jelusić M, Tambić BL. Depression, anxiety and pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20(3):274–6. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.12.014.
    1. Schanberg LE, Sandstrom MJ, Starr K, et al. The relationship of daily mood and stressful events to symptoms in juvenile rheumatic disease. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13(1):33–41. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200002)13:1<33::AID-ART6>;2-S.
    1. Mullick MSI, Nahar JS, Haq SA. Psychiatric morbidity, stressors, impact, and burden in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005;23(2):142–9.
    1. Rubin KH, Bukowski WM. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups. : Relationships, and Groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2011.
    1. Stinson JN, Toomey PC, Stevens BJ, et al. Asking the experts: exploring the self-management needs of adolescents with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(1):65–72. doi: 10.1002/art.23244.
    1. Stinson JN, McGrath PJ, Hodnett ED, et al. An internet-based self-management program with telephone support for adolescents with arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(9):1944–52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.091327.
    1. Tong A, Jones J, Craig JC, Singh-Grewal D. Children's experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(9):1392–404. doi: 10.1002/acr.21695.
    1. Dennis C-L. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(3):321–32. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5.
    1. Ahola Kohut S, Stinson JN, Ruskin D, Forgeron PA, Harris L, van Wyk M, Luca S, Campbell F. iPeer2Peer program: a pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain. Pain. 2016;157:1146–55. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000496.
    1. Ahola Kohut S, Stinson JN, Giosa L, Luca S, van Wyk M. Systematic review of peer support interventions for adolescents with chronic illness: a narrative analysis. Int J Child Adoles Health. 2014;7(3):183–97.
    1. Sandhu S, Veinot P, Embuldeniya G, et al. Peer-to-peer mentoring for individuals with early inflammatory arthritis: feasibility pilot. BMJ Open. 2013;3(3):e002267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002267.
    1. Sansom-Daly UM, Peate M, Wakefield CE, Bryant RA, Cohn RJ. A systematic review of psychological interventions for adolescents and young adults living with chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2012;31(3):380–93. doi: 10.1037/a0025977.
    1. van Pelt PA, Drossaert CHC, Kruize AA, Huisman J, Dolhain RJEM, Wulffraat NM. Use and perceived relevance of health-related internet sites and online contact with peers among young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2015;54(10):1833–41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev193.
    1. Stinson JN, Ahola Kohut S, Amaria K, Bell MJ, Forgeron P, Kaufman M, Luca N, Spiegel LR. Virtual peer-to-peer mentoring support for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the virtual peer-to-peer program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatology. 2015;67 suppl 10. .
    1. Jerson B, D'Urso C, Arnon R, et al. Adolescent transplant recipients as peer mentors: a program to improve self-management and health-related quality of life. Pediatr Transplantation. 2013;17(7):612–20.
    1. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders : DSM-IV-TR. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. André M, Hedengren E, Hagelberg S, Stenström CH. Perceived ability to manage juvenile chronic arthritis among adolescents and parents: development of a questionnaire to assess medical issues, exercise, pain, and social support. Arthritis Care Res. 1999;12(4):229–37. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)12:4<229::AID-ART1>;2-J.
    1. Stinson JN, Stevens BJ, Feldman BM, et al. Construct validity of a multidimensional electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain. 2008;136(3):281–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.002.
    1. Barlow JH, Shaw KL, Wright CC. Development and preliminary validation of a children's arthritis self-efficacy scale. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45(2):159–66. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)45:2<159::AID-ANR169>;2-2.
    1. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL™: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37(2):126. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003.
    1. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
    1. Benenson JF, Christakos A. The greater fragility of females“ versus males” closest same-sex friendships. Child Dev. 2003;74(4):1123–9. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00596.
    1. Rhodes JE, Spencer R, Saito RN, Sipe CL. Online mentoring: the promise and challenges of an emerging approach to youth development. J Prim Prev. 2006;27(5):497–513. doi: 10.1007/s10935-006-0051-y.
    1. Shpigelman C-N, Tamar Weiss PL, Reiter S. E-mentoring for all. Comp Hum Beh. 2009;25(4):919–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.007.
    1. Shpigelman C-N, Gill CJ. The characteristics of unsuccessful e-mentoring relationships for youth with disabilities. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(4):463–75. doi: 10.1177/1049732312469115.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe