Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference?

Kay H Stricker, Oliver Kimberger, Kurt Schmidlin, Marcel Zwahlen, Ulrike Mohr, Hans U Rothen, Kay H Stricker, Oliver Kimberger, Kurt Schmidlin, Marcel Zwahlen, Ulrike Mohr, Hans U Rothen

Abstract

Purpose: To assess family satisfaction in the ICU and to identify parameters for improvement.

Methods: Multicenter study in Swiss ICUs. Families were given a questionnaire covering overall satisfaction, satisfaction with care and satisfaction with information/decision-making. Demographic, medical and institutional data were gathered from patients, visitors and ICUs.

Results: A total of 996 questionnaires from family members were analyzed. Individual questions were assessed, and summary measures (range 0-100) were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Summary score was 78 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD) for overall satisfaction, 79 +/- 14 for care and 77 +/- 15 for information/decision-making. In multivariable multilevel linear regression analyses, higher severity of illness was associated with higher satisfaction, while a higher patient:nurse ratio and written admission/discharge criteria were associated with lower overall satisfaction. Using performance-importance plots, items with high impact on overall satisfaction but low satisfaction were identified. They included: emotional support, providing understandable, complete, consistent information and coordination of care.

Conclusions: Overall, proxies were satisfied with care and with information/decision-making. Still, several factors, such as emotional support, coordination of care and communication, are associated with poor satisfaction, suggesting the need for improvement.

Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1611-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

    1. Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3 Suppl):65S-75S
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):448-56
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb 15;165(4):434-5
    1. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Jul;24(1):17-31
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):135-9
    1. J Crit Care. 2001 Dec;16(4):142-9
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan;29(1):75-82
    1. Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):614-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31
    1. Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1975-6
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1853-62
    1. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Feb;25(1):58-67
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1097-101
    1. Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1922-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93
    1. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1893-7
    1. J Crit Care. 2007 Sep;22(3):204-11
    1. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2003;39(2):213-22
    1. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):2025-6
    1. Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R96-109
    1. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;29(1):192-6
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):76-81
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):442-8
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94
    1. Crit Care Med. 2004 Jul;32(7):1484-8
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1489-97
    1. Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul;30(7):1413-8
    1. Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):266-71
    1. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Dec;12(6):614-8
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1857-62
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1329-36
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):978-85
    1. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78
    1. J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):281-6
    1. Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1425-33
    1. Am J Nurs. 1978 Jan;78(1):50-3
    1. J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):19-22
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):605-22
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):664-74

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe