Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury

Zachary D Threlkeld, Yelena G Bodien, Eric S Rosenthal, Joseph T Giacino, Alfonso Nieto-Castanon, Ona Wu, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Brian L Edlow, Zachary D Threlkeld, Yelena G Bodien, Eric S Rosenthal, Joseph T Giacino, Alfonso Nieto-Castanon, Ona Wu, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Brian L Edlow

Abstract

Integrity of the default mode network (DMN) is believed to be essential for human consciousness. However, the effects of acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on DMN functional connectivity are poorly understood. Furthermore, the temporal dynamics of DMN reemergence during recovery of consciousness have not been studied longitudinally in patients with acute severe TBI. We performed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to measure DMN connectivity in 17 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with acute severe TBI and in 16 healthy control subjects. Eight patients returned for follow-up rs-fMRI and behavioral assessment six months post-injury. At each time point, we analyzed DMN connectivity by measuring intra-network correlations (i.e. positive correlations between DMN nodes) and inter-network anticorrelations (i.e. negative correlations between the DMN and other resting-state networks). All patients were comatose upon arrival to the ICU and had a disorder of consciousness (DoC) at the time of acute rs-fMRI (9.2 ± 4.6 days post-injury): 2 coma, 4 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, 7 minimally conscious state, and 4 post-traumatic confusional state. We found that, while DMN anticorrelations were absent in patients with acute DoC, patients who recovered from coma to a minimally conscious or confusional state while in the ICU showed partially preserved DMN correlations. Patients who remained in coma or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome in the ICU showed no DMN correlations. All eight patients assessed longitudinally recovered beyond the confusional state by 6 months post-injury and showed normal DMN correlations and anticorrelations, indistinguishable from those of healthy subjects. Collectively, these findings suggest that recovery of consciousness after acute severe TBI is associated with partial preservation of DMN correlations in the ICU, followed by long-term normalization of DMN correlations and anticorrelations. Both intra-network DMN correlations and inter-network DMN anticorrelations may be necessary for full recovery of consciousness after acute severe TBI.

Keywords: Coma; Consciousness; Default mode network; Resting-state functional MRI; Traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1. Default mode network functional connectivity
Fig. 1. Default mode network functional connectivity
Fisher's z-transformed correlation maps of resting-state functional connectivity using four default mode network (DMN) seeds (thresholded height-level P<0.001; cluster-level false discovery rate-corrected P<0.05) in healthy controls, patients who fully recovered consciousness at 6-month follow-up, patients who acutely recovered to MCS/PTCS, and patients with coma or UWS.
Fig. 2. Differences in default mode network…
Fig. 2. Differences in default mode network functional connectivity between groups
Comparisons of resting-state functional connectivity among groups of interest (thresholded height-level P<0.001; cluster-level false discovery rate-corrected P<0.05). Clockwise from upper left: regions with stronger default mode network (DMN) connectivity in healthy subjects than in patients with acute traumatic disorders of consciousness (DoC); regions with stronger connectivity in patients who fully recovered consciousness at 6 months than in the same patients acutely after TBI; connectivity in healthy subjects compared with patients who fully recovered consciousness by 6-month follow-up; and regions with stronger connectivity in patients with acute MCS/PTCS than in patients with acute coma/UWS. Comparisons used the general linear model with motion as a regressor, accounting for paired measures in the longitudinal comparison of recovered versus acute patients.
Fig. 3. Quantitative connectivity within significant clusters
Fig. 3. Quantitative connectivity within significant clusters
Mean connectivity z-scores were extracted from the largest clusters generated within each between-group comparison to assess the directionality of observed differences. Compared to healthy subjects, patients demonstrate diminished correlation in DMN nodes (right posterior cingulate cortex [R PCC] shown), as well as pathologic correlation in regions typically anticorrelated with the DMN (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [L DLPFC] and left parietal cortex). Unconscious patients have reduced correlation in the right medial prefrontal cortex (R MPFC) and R PCC compared to conscious patients. Among patients followed longitudinally, correlations strengthen in the left PCC (L PCC), and pathological correlations in the L DLPFC appropriately become anticorrelated.
Fig. 4. Global default mode network correlation…
Fig. 4. Global default mode network correlation and anticorrelation
A) Mean global default mode network (DMN) correlation and DMN anticorrelation Fisher's transformed z-scores, by group. Boxes show interquartile range; whiskers extend to minimum and maximum values. Comparisons between coma/UWS, MCS/PTCS, and healthy subjects were conducted with analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test. * = P<0.002; ** = P<0.001. B) Mean global DMN correlation and DMN anticorrelation z-scores in eight patients followed longitudinally. Comparison was conducted with a paired t-test. Open circles represent unconscious patients (coma/UWS), while closed circles represent conscious patients (MCS/PTCS). * = P<0.01.

References

    1. Amico E, Marinazzo D, Di Perri C, Heine L, Annen J, Martial C, et al. Goni J. Mapping the functional connectome traits of levels of consciousness. Neuroimage. 2017;148:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.020.
    1. Andrews-Hanna JR, Reidler JS, Huang C, Buckner RL. Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(1):322–335. doi: 10.1152/jn.00830.2009.
    1. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37(1):90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042.
    1. Birn RM, Molloy EK, Patriat R, Parker T, Meier TB, Kirk GR, et al. Prabhakaran V. The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates. Neuroimage. 2013;83:550–558. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.099.
    1. Bodien YG, Chatelle C, Edlow BL. Functional Networks in Disorders of Consciousness. Semin Neurol. 2017;37(5):485–502. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607310.
    1. Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Edlow BL. Functional MRI Motor Imagery Tasks to Detect Command Following in Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness. Front Neurol. 2017;8:688. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00688.
    1. Boly M, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Schnakers C, Ledoux D, et al. Laureys S. Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(8):2393–2400. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20672.
    1. Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, Noirhomme Q, Lauwick S, Luxen A, et al. Boly M. Breakdown of within- and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity during propofol-induced loss of consciousness. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1038–1053. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f697f5.
    1. Braga RM, Buckner RL. Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity. Neuron. 2017;95(2):457–471 e455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.038.
    1. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review] Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011.
    1. Crone JS, Ladurner G, Holler Y, Golaszewski S, Trinka E, Kronbichler M. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an fMRI study. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026373.
    1. Davis MH, Coleman MR, Absalom AR, Rodd JM, Johnsrude IS, Matta BF, et al. Menon DK. Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(41):16032–16037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701309104.
    1. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, Voss HU, Crone JS, de Los Angeles C, et al. Laureys S. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 9):2619–2631. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv169.
    1. Di Perri C, Bahri MA, Amico E, Thibaut A, Heine L, Antonopoulos G, et al. Laureys S. Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(8):830–842. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00111-3.
    1. Di X, Gohel S, Kim EH, Biswal BB. Task vs. rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:493. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00493.
    1. Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA, Chu CJ, Bodien YG, O'Connor KL, et al. Wu O. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2017;140(9):2399–2414. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx176.
    1. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. [Comparative Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(27):9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
    1. Fransson P. Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: an fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;26(1):15–29. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20113.
    1. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(2):99–114. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279.
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–2029. doi:S0003999304004770 [pii]
    1. Golland Y, Bentin S, Gelbard H, Benjamini Y, Heller R, Nir Y, et al. Malach R. Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(4):766–777. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk030.
    1. Greicius MD, Kiviniemi V, Tervonen O, Vainionpaa V, Alahuhta S, Reiss AL, Menon V. Persistent default-mode network connectivity during light sedation. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;29(7):839–847. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20537.
    1. He JH, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Qiu SY, Zhou ZY, Dang YY, et al. Xu RX. Hyperactive external awareness against hypoactive internal awareness in disorders of consciousness using resting-state functional MRI: highlighting the involvement of visuo-motor modulation. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(8):880–886. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3130.
    1. Horovitz SG, Braun AR, Carr WS, Picchioni D, Balkin TJ, Fukunaga M, Duyn JH. Decoupling of the brain's default mode network during deep sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(27):11376–11381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901435106.
    1. Keller CJ, Bickel S, Honey CJ, Groppe DM, Entz L, Craddock RC, et al. Mehta AD. Neurophysiological investigation of spontaneous correlated and anticorrelated fluctuations of the BOLD signal. J Neurosci. 2013;33(15):6333–6342. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4837-12.2013.
    1. Kirsch M, Guldenmund P, Ali Bahri M, Demertzi A, Baquero K, Heine L, et al. Laureys S. Sedation of Patients With Disorders of Consciousness During Neuroimaging: Effects on Resting State Functional Brain Connectivity. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):588–598. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001721.
    1. Kondziella D, Fisher PM, Larsen VA, Hauerberg J, Fabricius M, Moller K, Knudsen GM. Functional MRI for Assessment of the Default Mode Network in Acute Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0407-6.
    1. Mason MF, Norton MI, Van Horn JD, Wegner DM, Grafton ST, Macrae CN. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science. 2007;315(5810):393–395. doi: 10.1126/science.1131295.
    1. Muschelli J, Nebel MB, Caffo BS, Barber AD, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH. Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor. Neuroimage. 2014;96:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.028.
    1. Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, Lee DH, Sharpe MD, Mirsattari SM. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Neurology. 2012;78(3):175–181. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823fcd61.
    1. Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z, Duncan NW, Tang W, Wolff A, et al. Northoff G. How are different neural networks related to consciousness? Ann Neurol. 2015;78(4):594–605. doi: 10.1002/ana.24479.
    1. Raichle ME. The restless brain. Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):3–12. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0019.
    1. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(2):676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676.
    1. Rosazza C, Andronache A, Sattin D, Bruzzone MG, Marotta G, Nigri A, et al. Coma Research Centre - Besta, I. Multimodal study of default-mode network integrity in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2016 doi: 10.1002/ana.24634.
    1. Russell WR. Cerebral involvement in head injury: a study based on the examination of two hundred cases. Brain. 1932;55(4):549–603.
    1. Sair HI, Hannawi Y, Li S, Kornbluth J, Demertzi A, Di Perri C, et al. Recovery, C. Early Functional Connectome Integrity and 1-Year Recovery in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest. Radiology. 2017;162161 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162161.
    1. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, et al. Greicius MD. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2349–2356. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007.
    1. Sherer M, Nakase-Thompson R, Yablon SA, Gontkovsky ST. Multidimensional assessment of acute confusion after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(5):896–904. doi:S0003999305000080[pii]10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.029.
    1. Shulman GL, Fiez JA, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Miezin FM, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997;9:648–663.
    1. Silva S, de Pasquale F, Vuillaume C, Riu B, Loubinoux I, Geeraerts T, et al. Peran P. Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology. 2015;85(23):2036–2044. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002196.
    1. Spadone S, Della Penna S, Sestieri C, Betti V, Tosoni A, Perrucci MG, et al. Corbetta M. Dynamic reorganization of human resting-state networks during visuospatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(26):8112–8117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415439112.
    1. Stamatakis EA, Adapa RM, Absalom AR, Menon DK. Changes in resting neural connectivity during propofol sedation. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014224.
    1. Stuss DT, Binns MA, Carruth FG, Levine B, Brandys CE, Moulton RJ, et al. Schwartz ML. The acute period of recovery from traumatic brain injury: posttraumatic amnesia or posttraumatic confusional state? J Neurosurg. 1999;90(4):635–643.
    1. Symonds CP. Observations on the differential diagnosis and treatment of cerebral states consequent upon head injuries. Br Med J. 1928;2(3540):829–832.
    1. Tagliazucchi E, Laufs H. Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron. 2014;82(3):695–708. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020.
    1. van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Salat DH, Fischl B. Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. Neuroimage. 2008;40(2):559–569. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.025.
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, Schabus M, Noirhomme Q, Bredart S, Boly M, et al. Laureys S. Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23(3):570–578. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21488.
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ, Bruno MA, Boveroux P, Schnakers C, et al. Boly M. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. [Comparative Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Brain. 2010;133(Pt 1):161–171. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp313.
    1. Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S Coma Science Group, c. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):883–889. doi: 10.1002/ana.24962.
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Moran JM, Nieto-Castanon A, Triantafyllou C, Saxe R, Gabrieli JD. Associations and dissociations between default and self-reference networks in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2011;55(1):225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.048.
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125–141. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073.
    1. Woo CW, Krishnan A, Wager TD. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Neuroimage. 2014;91:412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058.
    1. Wu X, Zou Q, Hu J, Tang W, Mao Y, Gao L, et al. Yang Y. Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Patterns Predict Consciousness Level and Recovery Outcome in Acquired Brain Injury. J Neurosci. 2015;35(37):12932–12946. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0415-15.2015.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe