Effectiveness of Systematic Echocardiographic Screening for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nepalese Schoolchildren: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Prahlad Karki, Surendra Uranw, Santosh Bastola, Rajan Mahato, Nikesh Raj Shrestha, Kunjang Sherpa, Sahadeb Dhungana, Ayodele Odutayo, Keshar Gurung, Naveen Pandey, Krishna Agrawal, Prashant Shah, Martina Rothenbühler, Peter Jüni, Thomas Pilgrim, Prahlad Karki, Surendra Uranw, Santosh Bastola, Rajan Mahato, Nikesh Raj Shrestha, Kunjang Sherpa, Sahadeb Dhungana, Ayodele Odutayo, Keshar Gurung, Naveen Pandey, Krishna Agrawal, Prashant Shah, Martina Rothenbühler, Peter Jüni, Thomas Pilgrim

Abstract

Importance: Echocardiographic screening allows for early detection of subclinical stages of rheumatic heart disease among children in endemic regions.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of systematic echocardiographic screening in combination with secondary antibiotic prophylaxis on the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease.

Design, setting, and participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial included students 9 to 16 years of age attending public and private schools in urban and rural areas of the Sunsari district in Nepal that had been randomly selected on November 17, 2012. Echocardiographic follow-up was performed between January 7, 2016, and January 3, 2019.

Interventions: In the experimental group, children underwent systematic echocardiographic screening followed by secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in case they had echocardiographic evidence of latent rheumatic heart disease. In the control group, children underwent no echocardiographic screening.

Main outcomes and measures: Prevalence of the composite of definite or borderline rheumatic heart disease according to the World Heart Federation criteria in experimental and control schools as assessed 4 years after intervention.

Results: A total of 35 schools were randomized to the experimental group (n = 19) or the control group (n = 16). After a median of 4.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-4.5 years), 17 of 19 schools in the experimental group (2648 children; median age at follow-up, 12.1 years; IQR, 10.3-12.5 years; 1308 [49.4%] male) and 15 of 16 schools in the control group (1325 children; median age at follow-up, 10.6 years; IQR, 10.0-12.5 years; 682 [51.5%] male) underwent echocardiographic follow-up. The prevalence of definite or borderline rheumatic heart disease was 10.8 per 1000 children (95% CI, 4.7-24.7) in the control group and 3.8 per 1000 children (95% CI, 1.5-9.8) in the experimental group (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11-1.07; P = .06). The prevalence in the experimental group at baseline had been 12.9 per 1000 children (95% CI, 9.2-18.1). In the experimental group, the odds ratio of definite or borderline rheumatic heart disease at follow-up vs baseline was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13-0.65; P = .008).

Conclusions and relevance: School-based echocardiographic screening in combination with secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in children with evidence of latent rheumatic heart disease may be an effective strategy to reduce the prevalence of definite or borderline rheumatic heart disease in endemic regions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01550068.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Jüni reported receiving grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (this is a grant to the institution under the Canada Research Chairs Program), AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors International, Eli Lilly, The Medicines Company, and Appili Therapeutics outside the submitted work; honoraria from Amgen, Ava, and Fresenius; serves as unpaid member of the steering group of trials funded by AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors International, St. Jude Medical, and The Medicines Company; and has participated in advisory boards and/or consulting with Amgen, Ava, and Fresenius. Dr Pilgrim reported receiving grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; personal fees from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and HighLife SAS; and nonfinancial support from Medtronic outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Study Flowchart According to the…
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart According to the CONSORT Statement
Figure 2.. Prevalence of Definite and Borderline…
Figure 2.. Prevalence of Definite and Borderline Rheumatic Heart Disease in Experimental Schools and Control Schools
Error bars indicate 95% CIs.
Figure 3.. Stratified Analyses of Definite or…
Figure 3.. Stratified Analyses of Definite or Borderline Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) Across Major Subgroups
All subgroup analyses were post hoc. Odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) are estimated using the Mantel-Cox method with 2-sided P values from the log-rank test. P values for interactions were obtained with approximate χ2 tests for unequal ORs in the subgroups.
Figure 4.. Longitudinal Data of Children in…
Figure 4.. Longitudinal Data of Children in the Experimental Group With Definite Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) Who Underwent Follow-up
Orange lines indicate children in the eligible age range who underwent follow-up in the setting of the auxiliary cross-sectional examination; blue lines, children in the eligible age range who no longer attended (the same) school.

References

    1. Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990-2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):713-722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603693
    1. Yadgir S, Johnson CO, Aboyans V, et al. ; Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 Nonrheumatic Valve Disease Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of calcific aortic valve and degenerative mitral valve diseases, 1990-2017. Circulation. 2020;141(21):1670-1680. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043391
    1. Rothenbühler M, O’Sullivan CJ, Stortecky S, et al. . Active surveillance for rheumatic heart disease in endemic regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence among children and adolescents. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(12):e717-e726. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70310-9
    1. World Health Organization Study Group on Rheumatic Fever and Heart Disease . Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 20 October - 1 November 2001. 2004.
    1. de Dassel JL, de Klerk N, Carapetis JR, Ralph AP. How many doses make a difference? an analysis of secondary prevention of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(24):e010223. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010223
    1. Marijon E, Mirabel M, Celermajer DS, Jouven X. Rheumatic heart disease. Lancet. 2012;379(9819):953-964. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61171-9
    1. Marijon E, Ou P, Celermajer DS, et al. . Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease detected by echocardiographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):470-476. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa065085
    1. Shrestha NR, Karki P, Mahto R, et al. . Prevalence of subclinical rheumatic heart disease in Eastern Nepal: a school-based cross-sectional study. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):89-96. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0292
    1. Essop MR, Mayosi BM. Echocardiographic detection of latent rheumatic heart disease: a Pandora’s box? Circulation. 2017;136(23):2245-2247. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030642
    1. Urbaniak, G. C., Plous, S. (2011). Research Randomizer [computer software]. Version 3.0. Accessed April 22, 2011.
    1. Ministry of Education . United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Global Initiative on Out of School Children—Nepal Country Study, July 2016. UNICEF; 2016.
    1. Reményi B, Wilson N, Steer A, et al. . World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease: an evidence-based guideline. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9(5):297-309. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.7
    1. Gulliford MC, Adams G, Ukoumunne OC, Latinovic R, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):246-251. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.012
    1. Beaton A, Okello E, Aliku T, et al. . Latent rheumatic heart disease: outcomes 2 years after echocardiographic detection. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(7):1259-1267. doi:10.1007/s00246-014-0925-3
    1. Mirabel M, Bacquelin R, Tafflet M, et al. . Screening for rheumatic heart disease: evaluation of a focused cardiac ultrasound approach. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(1):e002324. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002324
    1. Sanyahumbi A, Beaton A, Guffey D, et al. . Two-year evolution of latent rheumatic heart disease in Malawi. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019;14(4):614-618. doi:10.1111/chd.12756
    1. Beaton A, Okello E, Engelman D, et al. . Determining the impact of benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis in children with latent rheumatic heart disease (GOAL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2019;215:95-105. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.001
    1. Nordet P, Lopez R, Dueñas A, Sarmiento L. Prevention and control of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: the Cuban experience (1986-1996-2002). Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008;19(3):135-140.
    1. Marijon E, Celermajer DS, Jouven X. Rheumatic heart disease - an iceberg in tropical waters. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):780-781. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1705840
    1. Nepal earthquakes: devastation in maps and images. Accessed February 27, 2020.
    1. Nepal school system left shattered in aftermath of quake. The New York Times. Accessed April 3, 2020.
    1. Madhesi unrest affects Nepal schools’ academic calendar. The Times of India. Accessed April 3, 2020.
    1. World Bank EdStats. Accessed June 20, 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe