Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence?

Abstract

Objectives: Intact urethral support and normal sphincter function are deemed important for urinary continence. We aimed to test whether the location of urethral kinking (as the probable anatomical correlate of maximal pressure transmission) is associated with stress urinary incontinence and/or urodynamic stress incontinence.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecological center in 2017. Patients had undergone an interview, multichannel urodynamic testing and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound examination. Those with a history of anti-incontinence surgery, absence of urethral kinking on ultrasound and/or missing or inadequate ultrasound volume data were excluded. Volume data were used to assess urethral mobility using a semi-automated Excel® urethral motion profile program. Mobility vectors were calculated using the formula √((x valsalva - x rest )2 + (y valsalva - y rest )2 ), where x and y are the coordinates of six equidistant points along the length of the urethra from the bladder neck to the external urethral meatus. The location of urethral kinking was identified as a concave contour of the urethra on the vaginal side in the midsagittal plane on maximum Valsalva maneuver. The distance between the center of the kink and the bladder neck was measured and expressed as a centile in relation to the total length of the urethra, using the formula: (distance from bladder neck/total length of urethra) × 100. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the associations of stress urinary incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence with age, maximum urethral pressure, urethral mobility vectors and location of urethral kinking.

Results: Of 450 women seen during the study period, 61 were excluded owing to previous incontinence surgery and 82 owing to absence of urethral kinking, inadequate volume data or missing data, leaving 307 women included, of whom 227 (74%) complained of stress urinary incontinence and 211 (69%) complained of urgency urinary incontinence. 190 (62%) of the women were diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence. On multivariate analysis, maximum urethral pressure (36 vs 50 cmH2 O; P < 0.001), mid-urethral mobility (2.27 vs 2.03 cm; P = 0.003) and location of urethral kinking (63.1st vs 59.7th centile; P = 0.002) were associated significantly with urodynamic stress incontinence. The location of urethral kinking was associated with stress urinary incontinence on univariate analysis (P = 0.026) but not on multivariate analysis (P = 0.21).

Conclusions: The location of urethral kinking is associated with urodynamic stress incontinence. The further urethral kinking is from the mid urethra, the more likely is urodynamic stress incontinence. This provides circumstantial evidence for the pressure-transmission theory of stress urinary continence. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: pressure transmission; stress urinary continence; ultrasound; urethral kinking; urinary incontinence.

© 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References

REFERENCES