Efficacy and Characteristics of the Stimuli of Action Observation Therapy in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Federico Temporiti, Paola Adamo, Emanuele Cavalli, Roberto Gatti, Federico Temporiti, Paola Adamo, Emanuele Cavalli, Roberto Gatti

Abstract

Background: The discovery of the Mirror Neuron System has promoted the development of Action Observation Therapy (AOT) to improve motor and functional abilities in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). This innovative approach involves observing video-clips showing motor contents, which may vary across the studies influencing AOT efficacy. To date, no studies have systematically summarized the effects of AOT in patients with PD on motor and functional outcomes, underlining the characteristics of visual stimuli in relation to their efficacy. Objectives: To describe the potential benefits of AOT in patients with PD and discuss the characteristics of visual stimuli used in clinical studies in relation to their efficacy. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and PEDro, from inception until March 2020. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of AOT on motor and functional recovery in patients with PD were included. Two independent reviewers appraised the records for inclusion, assessed the methodological quality, and extracted the following data: number and characteristics of participants, features and posology of the treatments, outcome measures at each follow-up, and main results. Findings were aggregated into a quantitative synthesis (mean difference and 95% confidence interval) for each time point. Results: Overall, 7 studies (189 participants) with a mean PEDro score of 6.1 (range: 4-8) points were selected. Included studies revealed AOT as effective in improving walking ability and typical motor signs (i.e., freezing of gait and bradykinesia) in patients with PD. Moreover, when this approach incorporated ecological auditory stimuli, changes to functional abilities and quality of life were also induced, which persisted up to 3 months after treatment. However, included studies adopted AOT stimuli with heterogeneous posology (from a single session to 8 weeks) and characteristics of motor contents might be responsible for different motor and functional recovery (person-related and viewing perspectives, transitive or intransitive actions, healthy subjects or patients, and association or not with imitation). Conclusions: AOT leads to improvements in motor and functional abilities in patients with PD and the characteristics of visual stimuli may play a role in determining AOT effects, deserving further investigations.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease; action observation therapy; functional recovery; motor function; rehabilitation.

Copyright © 2020 Temporiti, Adamo, Cavalli and Gatti.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection.

References

    1. Hirsch L, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves T, Pringsheim T. The incidence of parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. (2016) 46:292–300. 10.1159/000445751
    1. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. (2015) 386:896–912. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3
    1. Wirdefeldt K, Adami HO, Cole P, Trichopoulos D, Mandel J. Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson's disease: a review of the evidence. Eur J Epidemiol. (2011) 26:S1–58. 10.1007/s10654-011-9581-6
    1. Feng YS, Yang SD, Tan ZX, Wang MM, Xing Y, Dong F, et al. . The benefits and mechanisms of exercise training for Parkinson's disease. Life Sci. (2020) 245:117345. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117345
    1. Lee DJ, Dallapiazza RF, de Vloo P, Lozano AM. Current surgical treatments for Parkinson's disease and potential therapeutic targets. Neural Regen Res. (2018) 13:1342–5. 10.4103/1673-5374.235220
    1. Connolly BS, Lang AE. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA. (2014) 311:1670–83. 10.1001/jama.2014.3654
    1. Radder DLM, Sturkenboom IH, van Nimwegen M, Keus SH, Bloem BR, de Vries NM. Physical therapy and occupational therapy in Parkinson's disease. Int J Neurosci. (2017) 127:930–43. 10.1080/00207454.2016.1275617
    1. Tomlinson CL, Herd CP, Clarke CE, Meek C, Patel S, Stowe R, et al. . Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2014) 2014:CD002815. 10.1002/14651858.CD002815.pub2
    1. Bouça-Machado R, Rosário A, Caldeira D, Castro Caldas A, Guerreiro D, Venturelli M, et al. . Physical activity, exercise, and physiotherapy in parkinson's disease: defining the concepts. Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2019) 7:7–15. 10.1002/mdc3.12849
    1. di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res. (1992) 91:176–80. 10.1007/BF00230027
    1. Sarasso E, Gemma M, Agosta F, Filippi M, Gatti R. Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review. Arch Physiother. (2015) 5:14. 10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x
    1. Abbruzzese G, Avanzino L, Marchese R, Pelosin E. Action observation and motor imagery: innovative cognitive tools in the rehabilitation of parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis. (2015) 2015:124214. 10.1155/2015/124214
    1. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2004) 27:169–92. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
    1. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. (2006) 19:55–63. 10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007
    1. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P, Sawaki L, et al. . Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:9339–46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-05.2005
    1. Tallet J, Albaret JM, Rivière J. The role of motor memory in action selection and procedural learning: insights from children with typical and atypical development. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. (2015) 5:28004. 10.3402/snp.v5.28004
    1. Pelosin E, Barella R, Bet C, Magioncalda E, Putzolu M, Di Biasio F, et al. . Effect of group-based rehabilitation combining action observation with physiotherapy on freezing of gait in parkinson's disease. Neural Plast. (2018) 2018:4897276. 10.1155/2018/4897276
    1. Pelosin E, Bove M, Ruggeri P, Avanzino L, Abbruzzese G. Reduction of bradykinesia of finger movements by a single session of action observation in Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2013) 27:552–60. 10.1177/1545968312471905
    1. Jaywant A, Ellis TD, Roy S, Lin CC, Neargarder S, Cronin-Golomb A. Randomized controlled trial of a home-based action observation intervention to improve walking in parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2016) 97:665–73. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.029
    1. Buccino G, Gatti R, Giusti MC, Negrotti A, Rossi A, Calzetti S, et al. . Action observation treatment improves autonomy in daily activities in Parkinson's disease patients: results from a pilot study. Mov Disord. (2011) 26:1963–4. 10.1002/mds.23745
    1. Cosentino C, Baccini M, Putzolu M, Ristori D, Avanzino L, Pelosin E. Effectiveness of physiotherapy on freezing of gait in parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Mov Disord. (2020) 35:523–36. 10.1002/mds.27936
    1. Caligiore D, Mustile M, Spalletta G, Baldassarre G. Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2017) 72:210–22. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.005
    1. Ge S, Liu H, Lin P, Gao J, Xiao C, Li Z. Neural basis of action observation and understanding from first- and third-person perspectives: an fMRI study. Front Behav Neurosci. (2018) 12:283. 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00283
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2700. 10.1136/bmj.b2700
    1. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1992) 55:181–4. 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181
    1. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. (2003) 83:713–21. 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
    1. Agosta F, Gatti R, Sarasso E, Volonté MA, Canu E, Meani A, et al. . Brain plasticity in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait induced by action observation training. J Neurol. (2017) 264:88–101. 10.1007/s00415-016-8309-7
    1. Mezzarobba S, Grassi M, Pellegrini L, Catalan M, Kruger B, Furlanis G, et al. . Action observation plus sonification. A novel therapeutic protocol for parkinson's patient with freezing of gait. Front Neurol. (2018) 8:723. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00723
    1. Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M, Stramesi P, Nieuwboer A, Abbruzzese G. Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2010) 24:746–52. 10.1177/1545968310368685
    1. Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2014) 369:20130185. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0185
    1. Obeso JA, Rodríguez-Oroz MC, Benitez-Temino B, Blesa FJ, Guridi J, Marin C, et al. . Functional organization of the basal ganglia: therapeutic implications for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (2008) 23:S548–59. 10.1002/mds.22062
    1. Bloem BR, Hausdorff JM, Visser JE, Giladi N. Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena. Mov Disord. (2004) 19:871–84. 10.1002/mds.20115
    1. Tan DM, McGinley JL, Danoudis ME, Iansek R, Morris ME. Freezing of gait and activity limitations in people with Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2011) 92:1159–65. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.003
    1. Nieuwboer A, Giladi N. Characterizing freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: models of an episodic phenomenon. Mov Disord. (2013) 28:1509–19. 10.1002/mds.25683
    1. Snijders AH, Takakusaki K, Debu B, Lozano AM, Krishna V, Fasano A, et al. . Physiology of freezing of gait. Ann Neurol. (2016) 80:644–59. 10.1002/ana.24778
    1. Schmitz G, Mohammadi B, Hammer A, Heldmann M, Samii A, Münte TF, et al. . Observation of sonified movements engages a basal ganglia frontocortical network. BMC Neurosci. (2013) 14:32. 10.1186/1471-2202-14-32
    1. Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Avanzino L, Pelosin E. Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: current outlook and future challenges. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2016) 22:S60–4. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.005
    1. Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Barella R, Bet C, Magioncalda E, Trompetto C, et al. . Treadmill training frequency influences walking improvement in subjects with Parkinson's disease: a randomized pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2017) 53:201–8. 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04301-X
    1. Hulzinga F, Nieuwboer A, Dijkstra BW, Mancini M, Strouwen C, Bloem BR, et al. . The new freezing of gait questionnaire: unsuitable as an outcome in clinical trials? Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2020) 7:199–205. 10.1002/mdc3.12893
    1. Kawasaki T, Tozawa R, Aramaki H. Effectiveness of using an unskilled model in action observation combined with motor imagery training for early motor learning in elderly people: a preliminary study. Somatosens Mot Res. (2018) 35:204–11. 10.1080/08990220.2018.1527760
    1. Bek J, Gowen E, Vogt S, Crawford T, Poliakoff E. Action observation produces motor resonance in Parkinson's disease. J Neuropsychol. (2018) 12:298–311. 10.1111/jnp.12133
    1. Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ, Sereno MI. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage. (2007) 37:1315–28. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.008
    1. Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. (2013) 7:576. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00576
    1. Watanabe R, Watanabe S, Kuruma H, Murakami Y, Seno A, Matsuda T. Neural activation during imitation of movements presented from four different perspectives: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. (2011) 503:100–4. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.016
    1. Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage. (2006) 31:429–39. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.026
    1. Angelini M, Fabbri-Destro M, Lopomo NF, Gobbo M, Rizzolatti G, Avanzini P. Perspective-dependent reactivity of sensorimotor mu rhythm in alpha and beta ranges during action observation: an EEG study. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:12429. 10.1038/s41598-018-30912-w
    1. Villiger M, Estévez N, Hepp-Reymond MC, Kiper D, Kollias SS, Eng K, et al. . Enhanced activation of motor execution networks using action observation combined with imagination of lower limb movements. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e72403. 10.1371/journal.pone.0072403
    1. Fuchigami T, Morioka S. Differences between the influence of observing one's own movements and those of others in patients with stroke. Stroke Res Treat. (2019) 2019:3083248. 10.1155/2019/3083248
    1. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2013) 27:808–15. 10.1177/1545968313497101
    1. Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M, Cavallini P, Bonassi S, Dall'Armi V, et al. . Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. A randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2012) 26:456–62. 10.1177/1545968311427406
    1. Sale P, Ceravolo MG, Franceschini M. Action observation therapy in the subacute phase promotes dexterity recovery in right-hemisphere stroke patients. Biomed Res Int. (2014) 2014:457538. 10.1155/2014/457538
    1. Giorgi G, Ferrarello F, Merlo F, Fumagalli S, Marchionni N, Di Bari M. First-person perspective action observation training in individuals with parkinson's disease: a consideration-of-concept controlled pilot trial. J Geriatr Phys Ther. (2018) 41:134–42. 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000113
    1. Woodruff CC, Martin T, Bilyk N. Differences in self- and other-induced Mu suppression are correlated with empathic abilities. Brain Res. (2011) 1405:69–76. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.046
    1. Bellet PS, Maloney MJ. The importance of empathy as an interviewing skill in medicine. JAMA. (1991) 266:1831–2. 10.1001/jama.266.13.1831
    1. Lawson DT, Cusack WF, Lawson R, Hardy A, Kistenberg R, Wheaton LA. Influence of perspective of action observation training on residual limb control in naïve prosthesis usage. J Mot Behav. (2016) 48:446–54. 10.1080/00222895.2015.1134432
    1. Schlenstedt C, Mancini M, Nutt J, Hiller AP, Maetzler W, Deuschl G, et al. . Are hypometric anticipatory postural adjustments contributing to freezing of gait in parkinson's disease? Front Aging Neurosci. (2018) 10:36. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00036
    1. Enticott PG, Kennedy HA, Bradshaw JL, Rinehart NJ, Fitzgerald PB. Understanding mirror neurons: evidence for enhanced corticospinal excitability during the observation of transitive but not intransitive hand gestures. Neuropsychologia. (2010) 48:2675–80. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.014
    1. Papadourakis V, Raos V. Evidence for the representation of movement kinematics in the discharge of F5 mirror neurons during the observation of transitive and intransitive actions. J Neurophysiol. (2017) 118:3215–29. 10.1152/jn.00816.2016
    1. Balconi M, Vanutelli ME, Bartolo A, Cortesi L. Transitive and intransitive gesture execution and observation compared to resting state: the hemodynamic measures (fNIRS). Cogn Process. (2015) 16:125–9. 10.1007/s10339-015-0729-2
    1. Coll MP, Press C, Hobson H, Catmur C, Bird G. Crossmodal classification of Mu rhythm activity during action observation and execution suggests specificity to somatosensory features of actions. J Neurosci. (2017) 37:5936–47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3393-16.2017
    1. Gatti R, Rocca MA, Fumagalli S, Cattrysse E, Kerckhofs E, Falini A, et al. . The effect of action observation/execution on mirror neuron system recruitment: an fMRI study in healthy individuals. Brain Imaging Behav. (2017) 11:565–76. 10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3
    1. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. (2005) 3:e79. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079
    1. Kaplan JT, Iacoboni M. Getting a grip on other minds: mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy. Soc Neurosci. (2006) 1:175–83. 10.1080/17470910600985605
    1. Hétu S, Gagné M, Jackson PL, Mercier C. Variability in the effector-specific pattern of motor facilitation during the observation of everyday actions: implications for the clinical use of action observation. Neuroscience. (2010) 170:589–98. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.015
    1. Oh SJ, Lee JH, Kim DH. The effects of functional action-observation training on gait function in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Technol Health Care. (2019) 27:159–65. 10.3233/THC-181388
    1. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grèzes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex. (2005) 15:1243–9. 10.1093/cercor/bhi007
    1. Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol. (2006) 16:1905–10. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065
    1. Cross ES, Hamilton AFDC, Grafton ST. Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage. (2006) 31:1257–67. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033
    1. Cross ES, Hamilton AF, Kraemer DJ, Kelley WM, Grafton ST. Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. Eur J Neurosci. (2009) 30:1383–92. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06941.x
    1. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science. (2005) 308:662–7. 10.1126/science.1106138
    1. De Marco D, Scalona E, Bazzini MC, Avanzini P, Fabbri-Destro M. Observer-agent kinematic similarity facilitates action intention decoding. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:2605. 10.1038/s41598-020-59176-z
    1. Cusack WF, Cope M, Nathanson S, Pirouz N, Kistenberg R, Wheaton LA. Neural activation differences in amputees during imitation of intact versus amputee movements. Front Hum Neurosci. (2012) 6:182. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00182

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe