Insulin degludec in type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of a new-generation ultra-long-acting insulin compared with insulin glargine

Kåre I Birkeland, Philip D Home, Ulrich Wendisch, Robert E Ratner, Thue Johansen, Lars A Endahl, Karsten Lyby, Johan H Jendle, Anthony P Roberts, J Hans DeVries, Luigi F Meneghini, Kåre I Birkeland, Philip D Home, Ulrich Wendisch, Robert E Ratner, Thue Johansen, Lars A Endahl, Karsten Lyby, Johan H Jendle, Anthony P Roberts, J Hans DeVries, Luigi F Meneghini

Abstract

Objective: Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin that forms soluble multihexamers after subcutaneous injection, resulting in an ultra-long action profile. We assessed the efficacy and safety of IDeg formulations administered once daily in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in people with type 1 diabetes.

Research design and methods: In this 16-week, randomized, open-label trial, participants (mean: 45.8 years old, A1C 8.4%, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 9.9 mmol/L, BMI 26.9 kg/m(2)) received subcutaneous injections of IDeg(A) (600 μmol/L; n = 59), IDeg(B) (900 μmol/L; n = 60), or insulin glargine (IGlar; n = 59), all given once daily in the evening. Insulin aspart was administered at mealtimes. RESULTS At 16 weeks, mean A1C was comparable for IDeg(A) (7.8 ± 0.8%), IDeg(B) (8.0 ± 1.0%), and IGlar (7.6 ± 0.8%), as was FPG (8.3 ± 4.0, 8.3 ± 2.8, and 8.9 ± 3.5 mmol/L, respectively). Estimated mean rates of confirmed hypoglycemia were 28% lower for IDeg(A) compared with IGlar (rate ratio [RR]: 0.72 [95% CI 0.52-1.00]) and 10% lower for IDeg(B) compared with IGlar (RR: 0.90 [0.65-1.24]); rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia were 58% lower for IDeg(A) (RR: 0.42 [0.25-0.69]) and 29% lower for IDeg(B) (RR: 0.71 [0.44-1.16]). Mean total daily insulin dose was similar to baseline. The frequency and pattern of adverse events was similar between insulin treatments.

Conclusions: In this clinical exploratory phase 2 trial in people with type 1 diabetes, IDeg is safe and well tolerated and provides comparable glycemic control to IGlar at similar doses, with reduced rates of hypoglycemia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00612040.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change from baseline in A1C. Data are mean (last observation carried forward) for each time point.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative number of hypoglycemic episodes. A: confirmed episodes (PG <3.1 mmol/L or requiring assistance). B: Nocturnal episodes (all confirmed episodes between 2300 and 0559 h, inclusive).

References

    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2643–2653
    1. Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2002;287:2563–2569
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1997;46:271–286
    1. Bartley PC, Bogoev M, Larsen J, Philotheou A. Long-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target basal-bolus regimen with insulin aspart at meals: a 2-year, randomized, controlled trial. Diabet Med 2008;25:442–449
    1. Heise T, Nosek L, Rønn BB, et al. Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004;53:1614–1620
    1. Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Frier BM, et al. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabet Med 2005;22:749–755
    1. Woodward A, Weston P, Casson IF, Gill GV. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes—frequency and predictive factors. QJM 2009;102:603–607
    1. Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes 2008;57:3169–3176
    1. Smith CB, Choudhary P, Pernet A, Hopkins D, Amiel SA. Hypoglycemia unawareness is associated with reduced adherence to therapeutic decisions in patients with type 1 diabetes: evidence from a clinical audit. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1196–1198
    1. Davis RE, Morrissey M, Peters JR, Wittrup-Jensen K, Kennedy-Martin T, Currie CJ. Impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life and productivity in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:1477–1483
    1. Jonassen I, Havelund S, Ribel U, et al. Insulin degludec is a new generation ultra-long acting basal insulin with a unique mechanism of protraction based on multi-hexamer formation (Abstract). Diabetes 2010;59(Suppl. 1):A11
    1. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects—Last amended by the 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul 2008 [article online]. Available from Accessed 20 June 2008
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R1), Step 4 [article online]. Available from Accessed 20 June 2008
    1. Lindholm A, Jensen LB, Home PD, Raskin P, Boehm BO, Råstam J. Immune responses to insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:876–882
    1. Mire-Sluis AR, Barrett YC, Devanarayan V, et al. Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Immunol Methods 2004;289:1–16
    1. Bulsara MK, Holman CD, Davis EA, Jones TW. Evaluating risk factors associated with severe hypoglycaemia in epidemiology studies—what method should we use? Diabet Med 2004;21:914–919
    1. Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, et al. Insulin degludec: less pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady state conditions (Abstract). Diabetologia 2010;53(Suppl. 1):S387
    1. Meneghini LF, Home PD, Wendisch U, et al. Insulin degludec, a new generation ultra-long acting insulin, in a mealtime + basal regimen in people with type 1 diabetes: comparison to insulin glargine (Abstract). Diabetes 2010;59(Suppl. 1):A152
    1. Meneghini LF, Home P, DeVries JH, et al. Insulin degludec, a new generation ultra-long acting insulin, in a mealtime + basal regimen in people with type 1 diabetes: comparison to insulin glargine (Abstract). Diabetologia 2010;53(Suppl. 1):S338

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe