The SHIELD (Safety & Health Improvement: Enhancing Law Enforcement Departments) Study: Mixed Methods Longitudinal Findings

Kerry S Kuehl, Diane L Elliot, David P MacKinnon, Holly P O'Rourke, Carol DeFrancesco, Milica Miočević, Matthew Valente, Adriana Sleigh, Bharti Garg, Wendy McGinnis, Hannah Kuehl, Kerry S Kuehl, Diane L Elliot, David P MacKinnon, Holly P O'Rourke, Carol DeFrancesco, Milica Miočević, Matthew Valente, Adriana Sleigh, Bharti Garg, Wendy McGinnis, Hannah Kuehl

Abstract

The SHIELD (Safety & Health Improvement: Enhancing Law Enforcement Departments) Study is a worksite wellness team-based intervention among police and sheriff departments assessing the program's effectiveness to reduce occupational risks and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. The SHIELD program focused on improving diet, physical activity, body weight and sleep, and reducing the effects of unhealthy stress and behaviors, such as tobacco and substance abuse. The SHIELD team-based health promotion program was found to be feasible and effective at 6 months in improving diet, sleep, stress, and overall quality of life of law enforcement department personnel. Both intervention and control groups were followed for 24 months, and we report those durability findings, along with qualitative group interview results that provide insight into the changes of the long-term outcomes. Long-term effects were observed for consumption of fruits and vegetables, and there was some evidence for effects on tobacco and alcohol use. Assessment of dietary habits, physical activity behaviors, weight loss maintenance, and substance use is rare more than 1 year following an intervention, and in general, initial positive changes do not persist in prior research. The SHIELD program was feasible, effective, and durable for improving dietary changes.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The PHLAME firefighter program is distributed through the Center for Health Promotion Research at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). OHSU and Drs. Kuehl, Elliot, and Goldberg have a financial interest from the commercial sale of technologies used in this research. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average fruit/vegetable consumption for the intervention and control groups at each time of measurement +/− 1 standard error bars. Higher scores indicate higher consumption of fruits and vegetables.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe