A novel mathematical model of protein-bound uremic toxin kinetics during hemodialysis

Vaibhav Maheshwari, Stephan Thijssen, Xia Tao, Doris Fuertinger, Franz Kappel, Peter Kotanko, Vaibhav Maheshwari, Stephan Thijssen, Xia Tao, Doris Fuertinger, Franz Kappel, Peter Kotanko

Abstract

Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are difficult to remove by conventional hemodialysis; a high degree of protein binding reduces the free fraction of toxins and decreases their diffusion across dialyzer membranes. Mechanistic understanding of PBUT kinetics can open new avenues to improve their dialytic removal. We developed a comprehensive model of PBUT kinetics that comprises: (1) a three-compartment patient model, (2) a dialyzer model. The model accounts for dynamic equilibrium between protein, toxin, and the protein-toxin complex. Calibrated and validated using clinical and experimental data from the literature, the model predicts key aspects of PBUT kinetics, including the free and bound concentration profiles for PBUTs and the effects of dialysate flow rate and dialyzer size on PBUT removal. Model simulations suggest that an increase in dialysate flow rate improves the reduction ratio (and removal) of strongly protein-bound toxins, namely, indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, while for weakly bound toxins, namely, indole-3-acetic acid and p-cresyl glucuronide, an increase in blood flow rate is advantageous. With improved dialyzer performance, removal of strongly bound PBUTs improves gradually, but marginally. The proposed model can be used for optimizing the dialysis regimen and for in silico testing of novel approaches to enhance removal of PBUTs.

Conflict of interest statement

PK holds stock in Fresenius Medical Care. ST holds performance shares in Fresenius Medical Care. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intra-dialytic concentration profiles of protein-bound uremic toxins and urea. Circles depict data published by Eloot et al.; lines represent model fit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage protein binding at different time points during the course of dialysis; left-to-right for indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS). Top row corresponds to in vivo data from 10 HD patients and bottom row shows model simulations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage protein binding at the dialyzer blood inlet versus blood outlet after 120 min since dialysis start; left-to-right for indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS). Top row corresponds to in vivo data from 10 HD patients and bottom row shows model simulations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reduction ratio for total () and free () toxin concentration at different time points during an HD session; left-to-right for indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS). Top row corresponds to in vivo data from 10 HD patients and bottom row shows model simulations (solid line for total toxin concentration and dashed line for free toxin concentration).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of varying KoA and Qd on removal of phenol red. The left panel shows model predictions by Meyer et al., which closely matched their in vitro results obtained in bench dialysis experiments using artificial plasma (figure reproduced with permission). The blue lines (eh) describe urea removal and are not part of this discussion. The right panel shows results obtained with our mathematical model by simulating the scenarios studied by Meyer et al.. Line styles and labeling correspond to the same scenarios, which are the following: (a) F6, Qd 300 ml/min, ClPR 11 mL/min; (b) Optiflux F200NR, Qd 300 mL/min, ClPR 14 mL/min; (c) F6, Qd 750 mL/min, ClPR 16 mL/min; (d) Optiflux F200NR, Qd 750 mL/min, ClPR 23 mL/min. The KoA values presented in the right panel are calculated using phenol red clearance values and Meyer et al. clearance expression for PBUTs (reproduced in the Methods section).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Total (top row) and free (bottom row) protein-bound uremic toxin concentrations during and after dialysis; left-to-right for indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS). Concentrations are scaled in relation to pre-dialysis plasma concentration. Solid lines denote plasma concentrations, dotted lines interstitial concentrations, and dashed lines free intracellular concentrations. Note that free and total toxin concentrations in the intracellular compartment are identical, as there is no intracellular albumin. Therefore, intracellular concentrations are only shown in the bottom plots.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of blood flow rate (Qb) and dialysate flow rate (Qd) on reduction ratio (RR) calculated for total protein-bound uremic toxin concentration. Clockwise from top left: indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), and p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG). The simulations were performed for F180NR dialyzer with Qb and Qd were 300 and 700 mL/min, respectively; ultrafiltration volume 2 L. Initial toxin concentrations were same as in model calibration or Figure 1 and corresponding model parameters were taken from Table 3.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Block diagram of the model for protein-bound uremic toxin distribution and removal during dialysis. A three-compartmental model of the patient connected to dialyzer is shown. Here, T, PT, V denote free toxin concentration, protein-bound toxin concentration, and distribution volume in subscripted compartment plasma (pl), interstitial (is) and intracellular (ic); Qp, Qd, and Quf denote plasma flow rate, dialysate flow rate, and ultrafiltration rate, respectively; Cp denote free toxin or protein-bound toxin or toxin free protein concentration in dialyzer blood inlet and Cout in dialyzer blood outlet. A single dialyzer fiber is magnified to depict the counter-current blood and dialysate flow in dialyzer. A small fiber segment Δx is shown through which free toxin transfers from the plasma side to the dialysate side. Here, Qpi and Qdi denote inlet plasma and dialysate flow rate; Qpo and Qdo are outlet plasma and dialysate flow rates; Cpi and Cdi are the molar concentrations at the plasma and dialysate inlet, respectively; Cpo and Cdo are the molar concentrations at the respective outlets.

References

    1. Meyer TW, et al. Increasing dialysate flow and dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient to increase the clearance of protein-bound solutes. J Am Soc Nephol. 2004;15:1927–1935. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000131521.62256.F0.
    1. Sirich TL, Meyer TW, Gondouin B, Brunet P, Niwa T. Protein-bound molecules: a large family with a bad character. Seminars in nephrology. 2014;34:106–117. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2014.02.004.
    1. Itoh Y, Ezawa A, Kikuchi K, Tsuruta Y, Niwa T. Protein-bound uremic toxins in hemodialysis patients measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and their effects on endothelial ROS production. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403:1841–1850. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5929-3.
    1. Eloot S, et al. Protein-bound uremic toxin profiling as a tool to optimize hemodialysis. PloS one. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147159.
    1. Liabeuf S, Villain C, Massy ZA. Protein-bound toxins: has the Cinderella of uraemic toxins turned into a princess? Clin Sci. 2016;130:2209–2216. doi: 10.1042/CS20160393.
    1. Bammens B, Evenepoel P, Keuleers H, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Free serum concentrations of the protein-bound retention solute p-cresol predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1081–1087. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000115.
    1. Cao X-S, et al. Association of indoxyl sulfate with heart failure among patients on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephol. 2014;10:111–119. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04730514.
    1. Owada, A. et al. Effects of oral adsorbent AST-120 on the progression of chronic renal failure: a randomized controlled study. Kidney Int Supp, S188–190 (1997).
    1. Meijers BK, et al. The uremic retention solute p-cresyl sulfate and markers of endothelial damage. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:891–901. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.022.
    1. Sirich TL, Funk BA, Plummer NS, Hostetter TH, Meyer TW. Prominent accumulation in hemodialysis patients of solutes normally cleared by tubular secretion. J Am Soc Nephol. 2013;25:615–622. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013060597.
    1. Niwa T. Removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins by haemodialysis. Blood Purif. 2013;35:20–25. doi: 10.1159/000350843.
    1. Luo FJ-G, et al. Effect of increasing dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient and dialysate flow on clearance of protein-bound solutes: a pilot crossover trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:1042–1049. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.01.265.
    1. Meyer TW, et al. The clearance of protein-bound solutes by hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int. 2005;68:867–877. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00469.x.
    1. Meert N, et al. Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009;24:562–570. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn522.
    1. Tijink MS, et al. Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes for removal of protein-bound toxins from human plasma. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7819–7828. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.008.
    1. Wernert V, et al. Adsorption of the uremic toxin p-cresol onto hemodialysis membranes and microporous adsorbent zeolite silicalite. J Biotechnol. 2006;123:164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.009.
    1. Stange J, Ramlow W, Mitzner S, Schmidt R, Klinkmann H. Dialysis against a recycled albumin solution enables the removal of albumin‐bound toxins. Artif Organs. 1993;17:809–813. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1993.tb00635.x.
    1. Meyer TW, et al. Increasing the clearance of protein-bound solutes by addition of a sorbent to the dialysate. J Am Soc Nephol. 2007;18:868–874. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080863.
    1. Tao X, Thijssen S, Levin N, Kotanko P, Handelman G. Enhanced indoxyl sulfate dialyzer clearance with the use of binding competitors. Blood Purif. 2015;39:323–330. doi: 10.1159/000381008.
    1. Tao, X. et al. Improved dialytic removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins with use of albumin binding competitors: an in vitro human whole blood study. Sci Rep6 (2016).
    1. Jankowski, J., Zidek, W., Brettschneider, F. & Jankowski, V. (Google Patents, 2012).
    1. Eloot S, Schneditz D, Vanholder R. What can the dialysis physician learn from kinetic modelling beyond Kt/Vurea? Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2012;27:4021–4029. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs367.
    1. Deltombe O, et al. Exploring protein binding of uremic toxins in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease and during hemodialysis. Toxins. 2015;7:3933–3946. doi: 10.3390/toxins7103933.
    1. Liabeuf S, et al. Free p-cresylsulphate is a predictor of mortality in patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25:1183–1191. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp592.
    1. Klammt S, et al. Albumin-binding capacity (ABiC) is reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease along with an accumulation of protein-bound uraemic toxins. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2011;27:2377–2383. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr616.
    1. Watanabe H, et al. p‐Cresyl sulfate, a uremic toxin, causes vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell damages by inducing oxidative stress. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3 doi: 10.1002/prp2.92.
    1. Barreto FC, et al. Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clinical J Am Soc Nephol. 2009;4:1551–1558. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03980609.
    1. Vanholder R, Schepers E, Pletinck A, Neirynck N, Glorieux G. An update on protein-bound uremic retention solutes. J Renal Nutr. 2012;22:90–94. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2011.10.026.
    1. Maheshwari V, Samavedham L, Rangaiah G. A Regional Blood Flow Model for β2-Microglobulin Kinetics and for Simulating Intra-dialytic Exercise Effect. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:2879–2890. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0383-5.
    1. Schneditz D, Platzer D, Daugirdas JT. A diffusion-adjusted regional blood flow model to predict solute kinetics during haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009;24:2218–2224. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp023.
    1. Eloot S, et al. Complex compartmental behavior of small water-soluble uremic retention solutes: evaluation by direct measurements in plasma and erythrocytes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:279–288. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.009.
    1. Lee JW, et al. Bioanalytical approaches to quantify “total” and “free” therapeutic antibodies and their targets: technical challenges and PK/PD applications over the course of drug development. The AAPS journal. 2011;13:99–110. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9251-3.
    1. Jenkins, H. Le Chatelier’s Principle. Chemical Thermodynamics at a Glance, 160–163 (2008).
    1. Palmer, M., Chan, A., Dieckmann, T. & Honek, J. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1 edn, (Wiley, 2012).
    1. Eloot S, et al. Kinetic behavior of urea is different from that of other water-soluble compounds: the case of the guanidino compounds. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1566–1575. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00238.x.
    1. Duchesne R, et al. UT-A urea transporter protein in heart increased abundance during uremia, hypertension, and heart failure. Circulation research. 2001;89:139–145. doi: 10.1161/hh1401.093293.
    1. Meijers BK, et al. p-Cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate in hemodialysis patients. Clinical J Am Soc Nephol. 2009;4:1932–1938. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02940509.
    1. Ward RA, et al. Dialysate flow rate and delivered Kt/Vurea for dialyzers with enhanced dialysate flow distribution. Clinical J Am Soc Nephol. 2011;6:2235–2239. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02630311.
    1. Gutzwiller J, et al. Increasing blood flow increases kt/V (urea) and potassium removal but fails to improve phosphate removal. Clinical nephrology. 2003;59:130–136. doi: 10.5414/CNP59130.
    1. Ward RA, Greene T, Hartmann B, Samtleben W. Resistance to intercompartmental mass transfer limits beta(2)-microglobulin removal by post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1431–1437. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000048.
    1. Viaene L, et al. Albumin is the main plasma binding protein for indoxyl sulfate and p‐cresyl sulfate. Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition. 2013;34:165–175. doi: 10.1002/bdd.1834.
    1. Smith HW, Finkelstein N, Aliminosa L, Crawford B, Graber M. The renal clearances of substituted hippuric acid derivatives and other aromatic acids in dog and man. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1945;24 doi: 10.1172/JCI101618.
    1. Nguyen MK, Kurtz I. Quantitative interrelationship between Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium, osmolality of body fluid compartments, and plasma water sodium concentration. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006;100:1293–1300. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01274.2005.
    1. Kaysen GA, Rathore V, Shearer GC, Depner TA. Mechanisms of hypoalbuminemia in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1995;48:510–516. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.321.
    1. Devine E, Krieter DH, Rüth M, Jankovski J, Lemke H-D. Binding affinity and capacity for the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate. Toxins. 2014;6:416–429. doi: 10.3390/toxins6020416.
    1. Stiller S, Xu XQ, Gruner N, Vienken J, Mann H. Validation of a two-pool model for the kinetics of Beta 2-microglobulin. International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2002;25:411–420.
    1. Jaffrin MY, Maasrani M, Boudailliez B, Le Gourrier A. Extracellular and intracellular fluid volume monitoring during dialysis by multifrequency impedancemetry. Asaio Journal. 1996;42:M533–537. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199609000-00043.
    1. Cheung AK, Leypoldt JK. The hemodialysis membranes: a historical perspective, current state and future prospect. Seminars in nephrology. 1997;17:196–213.
    1. Walther J, et al. Downloadable computer models for renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1056–1063. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000196.
    1. Wendt R, et al. Sieving properties of hemodialysis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 1979;5:23–49. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80436-6.
    1. Rohatgi, A. WebPlotDigitizer, (January, 2017).
    1. Hootkins R. Lessons in dialysis, dialyzers, and dialysate. Dialysis & Transplantation. 2011;40:392–396. doi: 10.1002/dat.20609.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe