Liraglutide and Glycaemic Outcomes in the LEADER Trial

Bernard Zinman, Michael A Nauck, Heidrun Bosch-Traberg, Helle Frimer-Larsen, David D Ørsted, John B Buse, LEADER Publication Committee on behalf of the LEADER Trial Investigators, Bernard Zinman, Michael A Nauck, Heidrun Bosch-Traberg, Helle Frimer-Larsen, David D Ørsted, John B Buse, LEADER Publication Committee on behalf of the LEADER Trial Investigators

Abstract

Introduction: The LEADER trial was a cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk that compared liraglutide (n = 4668) with placebo (n = 4672) using a primary composite endpoint of 3-point major adverse CV events. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to investigate glycaemic outcomes across both treatment groups.

Methods: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at randomisation, month 3, month 6 and every 6 months thereafter. Cox regression was used to analyse time to a composite endpoint of glycaemic deterioration, defined as a specified change in HbA1c or a substantial intensification of insulin or oral antihyperglycaemic drug (OAD). The individual components of the composite were also analysed.

Results: Baseline characteristics, including insulin and OAD use, were balanced between treatment groups. HbA1c decreased from baseline in both groups, but the reduction was greater with liraglutide [estimated treatment difference at month 36: - 0.40%; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.45, - 0.34] despite the addition of more OADs and higher insulin use in the placebo group. Fewer of the patients treated with liraglutide (n = 3202, 68.6%) experienced glycaemic deterioration compared with those administered the placebo (n = 3988, 85.4%; average hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI 0.48, 0.53; p < 0.001). Analysis of the individual components showed similar results (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of CV events who were treated with liraglutide achieved greater reductions in HbA1c, had a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and presented less glycaemic deterioration than similar patients who received the placebo. Nonetheless, progressive loss of glycaemic control occurred in both groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01179048.

Funding: Novo Nordisk. Plain language summary available for this article.

Keywords: GLP-1 agonist; Glycaemic control; Incretin therapy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative incidence plot of time to HbA1c ≥ 8% and reduction < 0.5% since previous visit or substantial intensification* in insulin or OAD treatment. Aalen–Johansen plot, with death as a competing risk factor. *Substantial intensification of insulin or OAD defined as: start of new OAD; start of insulin; increase in insulin dose ≥ 10 units; or addition of mealtime bolus insulin to basal insulin or a shift from basal insulin to premixed insulin. HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, OAD oral antihyperglycaemic drug
Fig. 2i–ii
Fig. 2i–ii
Cumulative incidence plots for both parts of the composite endpoint. i Time to HbA1c ≥ 8% and reduction < 0.5% since previous visit. ii Time to substantial intensification* of insulin or OAD treatment. Aalen–Johansen plots, with death as a competing risk factor. *Substantial intensification of insulin or OAD defined as: start of new OAD; start of insulin; increase in insulin dose ≥ 10 units; or addition of mealtime bolus insulin to basal insulin or a shift from basal insulin to premixed insulin. HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, OAD oral antihyperglycaemic drug

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF global guideline for type 2 diabetes. 2012. . Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
    1. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–2572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm066227.
    1. UKPDS. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.
    1. Harris KB, McCarty DJ. Efficacy and tolerability of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2015;6:3–18. doi: 10.1177/2042018814558242.
    1. Garber A, Henry RR, Ratner R, Hale P, Chang CT, Bode B. Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, provides sustained improvements in glycaemic control and weight for 2 years as monotherapy compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:348–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01356.x.
    1. Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:204–212. doi: 10.1111/dom.12012.
    1. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311–322. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827.
    1. Marso SP, Poulter NR, Nissen SE, et al. Design of the liraglutide effect and action in diabetes: evaluation of cardiovascular outcome results (LEADER) trial. Am Heart J. 2013;166(823–30):e5.
    1. Rigato M, Fadini GP. Comparative effectiveness of liraglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:107–120.
    1. Henry RR, Klein EJ, Han J, Iqbal N. Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide once weekly over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes: an uncontrolled open-label extension of the DURATION-1 study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18:677–686. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0107.
    1. Trautmann ME, Van Gaal L, Han J, Hardy E. Three-year efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly: a pooled analysis of three trials. J Diabetes Compl. 2017;31:1415–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.06.004.
    1. Home PD, Ahren B, Reusch JEB, et al. Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;131:49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.013.
    1. Zinman Bernard, Wanner Christoph, Lachin John M., Fitchett David, Bluhmki Erich, Hantel Stefan, Mattheus Michaela, Devins Theresa, Johansen Odd Erik, Woerle Hans J., Broedl Uli C., Inzucchi Silvio E. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(22):2117–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.
    1. Neal Bruce, Perkovic Vlado, Mahaffey Kenneth W., de Zeeuw Dick, Fulcher Greg, Erondu Ngozi, Shaw Wayne, Law Gordon, Desai Mehul, Matthews David R. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(7):644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.
    1. Green Jennifer B., Bethel M. Angelyn, Armstrong Paul W., Buse John B., Engel Samuel S., Garg Jyotsna, Josse Robert, Kaufman Keith D., Koglin Joerg, Korn Scott, Lachin John M., McGuire Darren K., Pencina Michael J., Standl Eberhard, Stein Peter P., Suryawanshi Shailaja, Van de Werf Frans, Peterson Eric D., Holman Rury R. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(3):232–242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352.
    1. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1317–1326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307684.
    1. Leibowitz G, Cahn A, Bhatt DL, et al. Impact of treatment with saxagliptin on glycaemic stability and beta-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:487–494. doi: 10.1111/dom.12445.
    1. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1327–1335. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305889.
    1. Internal Clinical Guidelines Team. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2015. . Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
    1. Lenters-Westra E, Schindhelm RK, Bilo HJ, Groenier KH, Slingerland RJ. Differences in interpretation of haemoglobin A1c values among diabetes care professionals. Neth J Med. 2014;72:462–466.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe