A comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rates using Cockcroft-Gault and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimating equations in HIV infection

A Mocroft, L Ryom, P Reiss, H Furrer, A D'Arminio Monforte, J Gatell, S de Wit, M Beniowski, J D Lundgren, O Kirk, EuroSIDA in EuroCOORD, A Mocroft, L Ryom, P Reiss, H Furrer, A D'Arminio Monforte, J Gatell, S de Wit, M Beniowski, J D Lundgren, O Kirk, EuroSIDA in EuroCOORD

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)- or Cockcroft-Gault (CG)-based estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) performs better in the cohort setting for predicting moderate/advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Methods: A total of 9521 persons in the EuroSIDA study contributed 133 873 eGFRs. Poisson regression was used to model the incidence of moderate and advanced CKD (confirmed eGFR < 60 and < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively) or ESRD (fatal/nonfatal) using CG and CKD-EPI eGFRs.

Results: Of 133 873 eGFR values, the ratio of CG to CKD-EPI was ≥ 1.1 in 22 092 (16.5%) and the difference between them (CG minus CKD-EPI) was ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 20 867 (15.6%). Differences between CKD-EPI and CG were much greater when CG was not standardized for body surface area (BSA). A total of 403 persons developed moderate CKD using CG [incidence 8.9/1000 person-years of follow-up (PYFU); 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.0-9.8] and 364 using CKD-EPI (incidence 7.3/1000 PYFU; 95% CI 6.5-8.0). CG-derived eGFRs were equal to CKD-EPI-derived eGFRs at predicting ESRD (n = 36) and death (n = 565), as measured by the Akaike information criterion. CG-based moderate and advanced CKDs were associated with ESRD [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 7.17; 95% CI 2.65-19.36 and aIRR 23.46; 95% CI 8.54-64.48, respectively], as were CKD-EPI-based moderate and advanced CKDs (aIRR 12.41; 95% CI 4.74-32.51 and aIRR 12.44; 95% CI 4.83-32.03, respectively).

Conclusions: Differences between eGFRs using CG adjusted for BSA or CKD-EPI were modest. In the absence of a gold standard, the two formulae predicted clinical outcomes with equal precision and can be used to estimate GFR in HIV-positive persons.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; eGFR; end stage renal disease; renal function.

© 2013 British HIV Association.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bland−Altman plot of differences between estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) calculated using Cockcroft−Gault (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Moderate and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) as predictors of fatal and nonfatal end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality. Moderate (Mod.) CKD [confirmed (> 3 months apart) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 2] and advanced (Adv.) CKD (confirmed eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) are included as time-updated variables. *Multivariate models adjusted for gender, race, ethnic origin, region, CD4 count nadir and baseline date as fixed baseline covariates and hepatitis B, hepatitis C, prior AIDS diagnosis, prior non-AIDS-related event (pancreatitis, malignancy and end-stage liver disease for ESRD (and additionally ESRD for mortality), cardiovascular event, diabetes, hypertension, smoking status, anaemia, starting combination antiretroviral therapy, CD4 count, viral load and age as time-updated variables. BSA, body surface area; CG, Cockcroft−Gault; CI, confidence interval; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration.

References

    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
    1. Lamb EJ, Wood J, Stowe HJ, O’Riordan SE, Webb MC, Dalton RN. Susceptibility of glomerular filtration rate estimations to variations in creatinine methodology: a study in older patients. Ann Clin Biochem. 2005;42(Pt 1):11–18.
    1. Coresh J, Astor BC, McQuillan G, et al. Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:920–929.
    1. Mocroft A. The difficulties of classifying renal disease in HIV-infected patients. HIV Med. 2011;12:1–3.
    1. Stevens LA, Li S, Kurella TM, et al. Comparison of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equations: risk factors for and complications of CKD and mortality in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(3 Suppl 2):S9–16.
    1. Skali H, Uno H, Levey AS, Inker LA, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Prognostic assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate by the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation in comparison with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation. Am Heart J. 2011;162:548–554.
    1. Matsushita K, Tonelli M, Lloyd A, Levey AS, Coresh J, Hemmelgarn BR. Clinical risk implications of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation compared with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation for estimated GFR. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:241–249.
    1. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254.
    1. Vrouenraets SM, Fux CA, Wit FW, et al. A comparison of measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in successfully treated HIV-patients with preserved renal function. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77:311–320.
    1. Bonjoch A, Bayes B, Riba J, et al. Validation of estimated renal function measurements compared with the isotopic glomerular filtration rate in an HIV-infected cohort. Antiviral Res. 2010;88:347–354.
    1. van Deventer HE, George JA, Paiker JE, Becker PJ, Katz IJ. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in black South Africans by use of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Clin Chem. 2008;54:1197–1202.
    1. Barraclough K, Er L, Ng F, Harris M, Montaner J, Levin A. A comparison of the predictive performance of different methods of kidney function estimation in a well-characterized HIV-infected population. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;111:c39–c48.
    1. Inker LA, Wyatt C, Creamer R, Hellinger J, Hotta M, Leppo M, et al. Performance of creatinine and cystatin C GFR estimating equations in an HIV-positive population on antiretrovirals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:302–309.
    1. Ibrahim F, Hamzah L, Jones R, Nitsch D, Sabin C, Post FA. Comparison of CKD-EPI and MDRD to estimate baseline renal function in HIV-positive patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2291–2297.
    1. Dabrowska MM, Mikula T, Stanczak W, Malyszko J, Wiercinska-Drapalo A. Comparative analysis of the new chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration and the modification of diet in renal disease equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in HIV type 1-infected subjects. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27:809–813.
    1. Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, et al. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362:22–29.
    1. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992;41(RR-17):1–19.
    1. Kowalska JD, Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, et al. A standardized algorithm for determining the underlying cause of death in HIV infection as AIDS or non-AIDS related: results from the EuroSIDA study. HIV Clin Trials. 2011;12:109–117.
    1. Kowalska JD, Friis-Moller N, Kirk O, et al. The Coding Causes of Death in HIV (CoDe) Project: initial results and evaluation of methodology. Epidemiology. 2011;22:516–523.
    1. Mocroft A, Reiss P, Gasiorowski J, et al. Serious fatal and nonfatal non-AIDS-defining illnesses in Europe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:262–270.
    1. Delanaye P, Radermecker RP, Rorive M, Depas G, Krzesinski JM. Indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area in obese patients is misleading: concept and example. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:2024–2028.
    1. Delanaye P, Mariat C, Cavalier E, Krzesinski JM. Errors induced by indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area: reductio ad absurdum. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:3593–3596.
    1. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
    1. Mocroft A, Kirk O, Reiss P, et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, chronic kidney disease and antiretroviral drug use in HIV-positive patients. AIDS. 2010;24:1667–1678.
    1. Burnham K, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004;33:261–304.
    1. Juutilainen A, Kastarinen H, Antikainen R, et al. Comparison of the MDRD Study and the CKD-EPI Study equations in evaluating trends of estimated kidney function at population level: findings from the National FINRISK Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:3210–3217.
    1. Earley A, Miskulin D, Lamb EJ, Levey AS, Uhlig K. Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in the era of creatinine standardization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:785–795.
    1. Corsonello A, Pedone C, Lattanzio F, et al. Agreement between equations estimating glomerular filtration rate in elderly nursing home residents and in hospitalised patients: implications for drug dosing. Age Ageing. 2011;40:583–589.
    1. Tent H, Rook M, Stevens LA, et al. Renal function equations before and after living kidney donation: a within-individual comparison of performance at different levels of renal function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1960–1968.
    1. Lamb EJ, Webb MC, Simpson DE, Coakley AJ, Newman DJ, O’Riordan SE. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in older patients with chronic renal insufficiency: is the modification of diet in renal disease formula an improvement? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1012–1017.
    1. Verhave JC, Fesler P, Ribstein J, du Cailar G, Mimran A. Estimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: influence of age and body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46:233–241.
    1. Gupta SK, Eustace JA, Winston JA, et al. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected patients: recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1559–1585.
    1. EACS European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines. 2013. Version 6.1 November 2012, 2013.
    1. Johnson KR. Strengths and weaknesses of renal markers as risk factors and surrogate markers. Kidney Int. 2011;79:1272–1274.
    1. Murthy K, Stevens LA, Stark PC, Levey AS. Variation in the serum creatinine assay calibration: a practical application to glomerular filtration rate estimation. Kidney Int. 2005;68:1884–1887.
    1. Odden MC, Scherzer R, Bacchetti P, et al. Cystatin C level as a marker of kidney function in human immunodeficiency virus infection: the FRAM study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2213–2219.
    1. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:395–406.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe