Evaluation of Mechanisms to Improve Performance of Mobile Phone Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Research Protocol

Dustin G Gibson, George William Pariyo, Adaeze C Wosu, Abigail R Greenleaf, Joseph Ali, Saifuddin Ahmed, Alain B Labrique, Khaleda Islam, Honorati Masanja, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Adnan A Hyder, Dustin G Gibson, George William Pariyo, Adaeze C Wosu, Abigail R Greenleaf, Joseph Ali, Saifuddin Ahmed, Alain B Labrique, Khaleda Islam, Honorati Masanja, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Adnan A Hyder

Abstract

Background: Mobile phone ownership and access have increased rapidly across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) within the last decade. Concomitantly, LMICs are experiencing demographic and epidemiologic transitions, where non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are increasingly becoming leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Mobile phone surveys could aid data collection for prevention and control of these NCDs but limited evidence of their feasibility exists.

Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe a series of sub-studies aimed at optimizing the delivery of interactive voice response (IVR) and computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for NCD risk factor data collection in LMICs. These sub-studies are designed to assess the effect of factors such as airtime incentive timing, amount, and structure, survey introduction characteristics, different sampling frames, and survey modality on key survey metrics, such as survey response, completion, and attrition rates.

Methods: In a series of sub-studies, participants will be randomly assigned to receive different airtime incentive amounts (eg, 10 minutes of airtime versus 20 minutes of airtime), different incentive delivery timings (airtime delivered before survey begins versus delivery upon completion of survey), different survey introductions (informational versus motivational), different narrative voices (male versus female), and different sampling frames (random digit dialing versus mobile network operator-provided numbers) to examine which study arms will yield the highest response and completion rates. Furthermore, response and completion rates and the inter-modal reliability of the IVR and CATI delivery methods will be compared.

Results: Research activities are expected to be completed in Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Uganda in 2017.

Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to examine the feasibility of using IVR and CATI for systematic collection of NCD risk factor information in LMICs. Our findings will inform the future design and implementation of mobile phone surveys in LMICs.

Keywords: Bangladesh; CATI; IVR; Tanzania; Uganda; mHealth; mobile phone survey; noncommunicable diseases; survey methodology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Dustin G Gibson, George William Pariyo, Adaeze C Wosu, Abigail R Greenleaf, Joseph Ali, Saifuddin Ahmed, Alain B Labrique, Khaleda Islam, Honorati Masanja, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Adnan A Hyder. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.05.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design for sub-study 7.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sequence of the mobile phone survey.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Equations used to calculate the main outcomes.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. .
    1. Alwan A, Maclean DR, Riley LM, d'Espaignet ET, Mathers CD, Stevens GA, Bettcher D. Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: progress and capacity in high-burden countries. Lancet. 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1861–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61853-3.
    1. International Telecommunication Union The World in 2016: ICT Facts and Figures. [2016-12-12]. .
    1. Ballivian A, Azevedo J, Durbin W, Rios J, Godoy J, Borisova C, Ntsama SM. Listening to LAC: Using Mobile Phones for High Frequency Data Collection. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2013. [2017-04-08]. .
    1. Gibson DG, Farrenkopf B, Pereira A, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW. The development of an interactive voice response survey for noncommunicable disease risk factor estimation: technical assessment and cognitive testing. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7340.
    1. Hyder A, Wosu A, Gibson D, Labrique A, Ali J, Pariyo G. Noncommunicable disease risk factors and mobile phones: a proposed research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7246.
    1. The World Bank Mobile Cellular Subscriptions (per 100 people) [2016-11-12]. .
    1. Potthoff RF. Some generalizations of the Mitofsky-Waksberg technique for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987 Jun;82(398):409–4. doi: 10.2307/2289442.
    1. World Health Organization . STEPS: A Framework for Surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization; [2017-01-03]. .
    1. Global Adult Tobacco Survey Collaborative Group . Tobacco Questions for Surveys: A Subset of Key Questions From the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), 2nd Edition. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. .
    1. World Health Organization NCD Global Monitoring Framework: Ensuring Progress on Noncommunicable Diseases in Countries. [2017-04-28].
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43–6.
    1. Rigby AS. Statistical methods in epidemiology. v. Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient. Disabil Rehabil. 2000 May 20;22(8):339–44.
    1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 2016. .
    1. Pariyo GW, Wosu AC, Gibson DG, Labrique AB, Ali J, Hyder A. Moving the agenda on noncommunicable diseases: policy implications of mobile phone surveys in low- and middle-income countries. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7302.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe