Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques

Seckin Aydin, Baris Kucukyuruk, Bashar Abuzayed, Sabri Aydin, Galip Zihni Sanus, Seckin Aydin, Baris Kucukyuruk, Bashar Abuzayed, Sabri Aydin, Galip Zihni Sanus

Abstract

Cranioplasty is the surgical intervention to repair cranial defects. The aim of cranioplasty is not only a cosmetic issue; also, the repair of cranial defects gives relief to psychological drawbacks and increases the social performances. Many different types of materials were used throughout the history of cranioplasty. With the evolving biomedical technology, new materials are available to be used by the surgeons. Although many different materials and techniques had been described, there is still no consensus about the best material, and ongoing researches on both biologic and nonbiologic substitutions continue aiming to develop the ideal reconstruction materials. In this article, the principle materials and techniques of cranioplasty are reviewed.

Keywords: Allograft; autograft; cranioplasty; reconstruction; skull defects.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative view of one of our cases demonstrating the application fascia lata graft. (B: boney skull, F: fascia lata)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Silicon cranioplasty kit
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Porous polyethylene cranioplasty kit types, (b) postoperative head CT-scan of one of our cases demonstrating the defect reconstructed with porous polyethylene (arrow)
Figure 4
Figure 4
One of our cases with skull defect reconstructed with Cortoss™. (a) Intraoperative view of Cortoss™ use, (b) postoperative head 3D CT-scan demonstrating the defect reconstructed with Cortoss™ (arrows)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Titanium cranioplasty kit. (a) Titanium plate, (b) titanium mesh

References

    1. Sanan A, Haines SJ. Repairing holes in the head: A history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:588–603.
    1. Rish BL, Dillon JD, Meirowsky AM, Caveness WF, Mohr JP, Kistler JP, et al. Cranioplasty: A review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:381–5.
    1. Blake DP. The use of synthetics in cranioplasty: A clinical review. Mil Med. 1994;159:466–9.
    1. Prolo DJ, Burres KP, McLaughlin WT, Christensen AH. Autogenous skull cranioplasty: Fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:18–29.
    1. Viterbo F, Palhares A, Modenese E. Cranioplasty: The autograft option. J Craniofac Surg. 1995;6:80–3.
    1. Zins JE, Langevin CJ, Nasir S. Controversies in skull reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1755–60.
    1. Black SP. Reconstruction of the supraorbital ridge using aluminum. Surg Neurol. 1978;9:121–8.
    1. Abuzayed B, Tuzgen S, Canbaz B, Yuksel O, Tutunculer B, Sanus GZ. Reconstruction of growing skull fracture with in situ galeal graft duraplasty and porous polyethylene sheet. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1245–9.
    1. Taggard DA, Menezes AH. Successful use of rib grafts for cranioplasty in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34:149–55.
    1. Abuzayed B, Kafadar AM, Oğuzoğlu SA, Canbaz B, Kaynar MY. Duraplasty using autologous fascia lata reenforced by on-site pedicled muscle flap: Technical note. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:435–8.
    1. Rosenthal AH, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:802–11.
    1. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA. The use of bone grafts and alloplastic materials in cranioplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;268:270–8.
    1. Gruber R, Peter R, Hora J. The prognosis of cranioplasty following large craniectomy in children. Z Kinderchir. 1988;43:375–83.
    1. Zoltán B, Gábor T, István H. [Substitution of skull defects with methyl acrylate] Magy Traumatol Orthop Helyreallito Seb. 1976;19:259–68.
    1. Drosos GI, Babourda E, Magnissalis EA, Giatromanolaki A, Kazakos K, Verettas DA. Mechanical characterization of bone graft substitute ceramic cements. Injury. 2011 Mar 1;
    1. Gladstone HB, McDermott MW, Cooke DD. Implants for cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;28:381–400.
    1. Gosain AK. Hydroxyapatite cement paste cranioplasty for the treatment of temporal hollowing after cranial vault remodeling in a growing child. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;8:506–11.
    1. Chicarilli ZN, Ariyan S. Cranioplasty with a silicone prosthesis and split rib grafts. Head Neck Surg. 1986;8:355–62.
    1. Abuzayed B, Dashti R, Turk O, Kaynar MY. Aneurysmal frontal bone cyst in a child with history of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case of rare location and history. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010;32:e1–3.
    1. Kucukyuruk B, Biceroglu H, Abuzayed B, Ulu MO, Sanus GZ. Intraosseous meningioma: A rare tumor reconstructed with porous polyethylene. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:936–9.
    1. Arnaud E, De Pollak C, Meunier A, Sedel L, Damien C, Petite H. Osteogenesis with coral is increased by BMP and BMC in a rat cranioplasty. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1909–18.
    1. Sanus GZ, Tanriverdi T, Ulu MO, Kafadar AM, Tanriover N, Ozlen F. Use of Cortoss as an alternative material in calvarial defects: The first clinical results in cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:88–95.
    1. Makela T. Tantalum cranioplasty of war wounds of the skull. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1949;38:13–9.
    1. Kuttenberger JJ, Hardt N. Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micro-mesh systems. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29:75–81.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe