A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome at early medical contact: results from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) Project

Peng Ran, Jun-Qing Yang, Jie Li, Guang Li, Yan Wang, Jia Qiu, Qi Zhong, Yu Wang, Xue-Biao Wei, Jie-Leng Huang, Chung-Wah Siu, Ying-Ling Zhou, Dong Zhao, Dan-Qing Yu, Ji-Yan Chen, Peng Ran, Jun-Qing Yang, Jie Li, Guang Li, Yan Wang, Jia Qiu, Qi Zhong, Yu Wang, Xue-Biao Wei, Jie-Leng Huang, Chung-Wah Siu, Ying-Ling Zhou, Dong Zhao, Dan-Qing Yu, Ji-Yan Chen

Abstract

Background: A number of models have been built to evaluate risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, accurate prediction of mortality at early medical contact is difficult. This study sought to develop and validate a risk score to predict in-hospital mortality among patients with ACS using variables available at early medical contact.

Methods: A total of 62,546 unselected ACS patients from 150 tertiary hospitals who were admitted between 2014 and 2017 and enrolled in the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project, were randomly assigned (at a ratio of 7:3) to a training dataset (n=43,774) and a validation dataset (n=18,772). Based on the identified predictors which were available prior to any blood test, a new point-based risk score for in-hospital death, CCC-ACS score, was derived and validated. The CCC-ACS score was then compared with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score.

Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9% in both the training and validation datasets. The CCC-ACS score, a new point-based risk score, was developed to predict in-hospital mortality using 7 variables that were available before any blood test including age, systolic blood pressure, cardiac arrest, insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, history of heart failure, severe clinical conditions (acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock), and electrocardiographic ST-segment deviation. This new risk score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (P=0.10 for Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) in the training dataset and 0.85 (P=0.13 for Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) in the validation dataset. The CCC-ACS score was comparable to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score in the prediction of in-hospital death in the validation dataset.

Conclusions: The newly developed CCC-ACS score, which utilizes factors that are acquirable at early medical contact, may be able to stratify the risk of in-hospital death in patients with ACS.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS); early medical contact; in-hospital death; risk score.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-31). Dr. DQY and Dr. PR report grants from Guangzhou Science and Technology Innovation Commission, during the conduct of the study; Dr. GL and Dr. JQY reports grants from Sailing Foundation, during the conduct of the study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. The enrolled study population was divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset. ACS, acute coronary syndrome. STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. NSTE-ACS, non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome risk score (CCC-ACS score). SBP, systolic blood pressure. AHF, acute heart failure. CS, cardiogenic shock.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration of Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome risk score (CCC-ACS score). (A) Calibration of CCC-ACS score in the training dataset. (B) Calibration of CCC-ACS score in the validation dataset. The diagonal line indicates perfect calibration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Observed incidence of in-hospital death. Observed incidence of in-hospital death according to categories of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome risk score (CCC-ACS score) in the training and validation datasets. low risk (score ≤12), moderate risk (score: 13–20), and high risk (score ≥21).

References

    1. Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1333-41. 10.1056/NEJMoa1406656
    1. Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019;394:1145-58. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1
    1. Hu S, Gao R, Liu L, et al. Summary of the 2018 Report on Cardiovascular Diseases in China. Chinese Circulation Journal 2019;34:209-20.
    1. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2345-53. 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345
    1. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000;284:835-42. 10.1001/jama.284.7.835
    1. Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, et al. A new score for risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the ACUITY-PCI (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) risk score. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:1108-16. 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.011
    1. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, et al. A simple risk index for rapid initial triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an InTIME II substudy. LANCET 2001;358:1571-5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06649-1
    1. Huynh T, Kouz S, Yan AT, et al. Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Score: a new risk score for early prognostication in acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2013;166:58-63. 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.023
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119-77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:267-315. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
    1. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:485-510. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.018
    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:e139-e228. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
    1. Bawamia B, Mehran R, Qiu W, et al. Risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Am Heart J 2013;165:441-50. 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.020
    1. Hao Y, Liu J, Liu J, et al. Rationale and design of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project: A national effort to prompt quality enhancement for acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2016;179:107-15. 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.005
    1. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2010;38:675-90.
    1. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Chin J Cardiol 2012;40:353-67.
    1. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2014. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2014;42:98-122.
    1. Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol 2002;90:358-63. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02489-X
    1. A comparison of recombinant hirudin with heparin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1996;335:775-82. 10.1056/NEJM199609123351103
    1. Tamis-Holland JE, Palazzo A, Stebbins AL, et al. Benefits of direct angioplasty for women and men with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes Angioplasty (GUSTO II-B) Angioplasty Substudy. Am Heart J 2004;147:133-9. 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.06.002
    1. Chin CT, Chen AY, Wang TY, et al. Risk adjustment for in-hospital mortality of contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction: the acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) registry-get with the guidelines (GWTG) acute myocardial infarction mortality model and risk score. Am Heart J 2011;161:113-22.e2. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.004
    1. Palmerini T, Dangas G, Mehran R, et al. Predictors and implications of stent thrombosis in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:577-84. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963884
    1. Ritsinger V, Saleh N, Lagerqvist B, et al. High event rate after a first percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002328. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002328
    1. Cosmi F, Shen L, Magnoli M, et al. Treatment with insulin is associated with worse outcome in patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:888-95. 10.1002/ejhf.1146
    1. Zhang H, Goodman SG, Yan RT, et al. In-hospital management and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in relation to prior history of heart failure. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2016;5:214-22. 10.1177/2048872615574109
    1. Ranasinghe I, Naoum C, Aliprandi-Costa B, et al. Management and outcomes following an acute coronary event in patients with chronic heart failure 1999-2007. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:464-72. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs041
    1. Sanchis J, Nunez J, Bodi V, et al. Influence of comorbid conditions on one-year outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:291-6. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0702
    1. Iakobishvili Z, Feinberg MS, Danicek V, et al. Prior heart failure among patients with acute coronary syndromes is associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital heart failure. Acute Card Care 2006;8:143-7. 10.1080/17482940600931958
    1. Heggunje PS, Wade MJ, O'Rourke RA, et al. Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction; results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) trial. Eur Heart J 2000;21:2014-25. 10.1053/euhj.2000.2423
    1. Sutton AG, Finn P, Hall JA, et al. Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock. Heart 2005;91:339-44. 10.1136/hrt.2003.021691
    1. Bagai A, Schulte PJ, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic implications of creatine kinase-MB measurements in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2014;168:503-11.e2. 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.008
    1. Galla JM, Mahaffey KW, Sapp SK, et al. Elevated creatine kinase-MB with normal creatine kinase predicts worse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from 4 large clinical trials. Am Heart J 2006;151:16-24. 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.045

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe