Exploring the Impact of a Mobile Health Solution for Postpartum Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Pilot Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study

Sinéad Dufour, Donna Fedorkow, Jessica Kun, Shirley Xiaoxuan Deng, Qiyin Fang, Sinéad Dufour, Donna Fedorkow, Jessica Kun, Shirley Xiaoxuan Deng, Qiyin Fang

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period is a vulnerable time for the pelvic floor. Early implementation of pelvic floor muscle exercises, appropriately termed as pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), in the postpartum period has been advocated because of its established effectiveness. The popularity of mobile health (mHealth) devices highlights their perceived utility. The effectiveness of various mHealth technologies with claims to support pelvic floor health and fitness is yet to be substantiated through systematic inquiry.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability, feasibility, and potential effect on outcomes of an mHealth device purposed to facilitate pelvic floor muscle training among postpartum women.

Methods: A 16-week mixed methods pilot study was conducted to evaluate outcomes and determine aspects of acceptability and feasibility of an mHealth device. All participants received standardized examination of their pelvic floor muscles and associated instruction on the correct performance of PFMT. Those randomized to the iBall intervention received instructions on its use. Schedules for utilization of the iBall and PFMT were not prescribed, but all participants were informed of the standard established recommendation of PFMT, which includes 3 sets of 10 exercises, 3 to 4 times a week, for the duration of the intervention period. Quantitative data included the measurement of pelvic floor muscle parameters (strength, endurance, and coordination) following the PERFECT assessment scheme: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores and the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) scores. Aspects of acceptability and feasibility were collected through one-to-one interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Thorne's interpretive description approach.

Results: A total of 23 women with a mean age of 32.2 years were randomized to an intervention group (n=13) or a control group (n=10). Both groups improved on all measures. The only statistically significant change was the UDI-6 score within both groups at 16 weeks compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and control group on any outcomes. Most participants using the iBall (n=10, 77%) indicated value in the concept of the mHealth solution. Technical difficulties (n=10, 77%), a cumbersome initiation process (n=8, 61%), and discomfort from the device (n=8, 61%) were reasons impeding intervention acceptability. Most participants (n=17, 74%) indicated that the initial assessment and training was more useful than the mHealth solution, a tenet that was echoed by all control group participants.

Conclusions: Our pilot study demonstrated the potential for mHealth solution-enhanced PFMT in the early postpartum period. Usability issues in hardware and software hindered feasibility and acceptance by the participants. Our findings can inform the redesign of mHealth solutions that may be of value if acceptability and feasibility issues can be overcome.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02865954; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02865954.

Keywords: biofeedback; computer games; feasibility study; mobile health; pelvic floor; postpartum; wearable technology; wireless technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Sinéad Dufour, Donna Fedorkow, Jessica Kun, Shirley Xiaoxuan Deng, Qiyin Fang. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.07.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mHealth iBall device. The iBall device consists of a Bluetooth antenna that sits outside of the body and 2 spherical compartments containing a battery and biofeedback sensor that sits within the vaginal canal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The iBall App. Left: There are a number of activities that aid in engaging the pelvic floor. Right: The progress of the user can be tracked and monitored.

References

    1. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Norwegian EPINCONT (Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag) study A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1150–7.
    1. Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith EJ, Habée-Séguin GM. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 14;(5):CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub3.
    1. Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Habée-Séguin GM, Mercier J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Apr;34(4):300–8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22700.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health . Urinary Incontinence: The Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women, 2nd Edition. London: RCOG Press; 2013.
    1. Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Kane RL. Effective Health Care Program, AHRQ. 2012. Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness .
    1. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;118(4):777–84. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f.
    1. Viktrup L, Summers KH, Dennett SL. Clinical practice guidelines on the initial assessment and treatment of urinary incontinence in women: a US focused review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jul;86(Suppl 1):S25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.05.008.
    1. Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;53(3):220–30. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12059.
    1. Solans-Domènech M, Sánchez E, Espuña-Pons M, Pelvic Floor Research Group (Grup de Recerca del Sòl Pelvià; GRESP) Urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: incidence, severity, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):618–28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d04dff.
    1. Coyne KS, Kvasz M, Ireland AM, Milsom I, Kopp ZS, Chapple CR. Urinary incontinence and its relationship to mental health and health-related quality of life in men and women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.049.
    1. Nilsson M, Margareta N, Lalos A, Ann L, Lalos O, Othon L. The impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on quality of life and partner relationship. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(8):976–81. doi: 10.1002/nau.20709.
    1. Swithinbank LV, Abrams P. The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of women. World J Urol. 1999 Aug;17(4):225–9.
    1. Melville JL, Delaney K, Newton K, Katon W. Incontinence severity and major depression in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;106(3):585–92. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000173985.39533.37.
    1. Smith AP. Female urinary incontinence and wellbeing: results from a multi-national survey. BMC Urol. 2016 May 23;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0140-z.
    1. Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, Bortolini M, Dumoulin C, Gomes M, McClurg D, Meijlink J, Shelly E, Trabuco E, Walker C, Wells A. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Dec;36(2):221–44. doi: 10.1002/nau.23107.
    1. Glazener CM, Herbison GP, MacArthur C, Lancashire R, McGee MA, Grant AM, Wilson PD. New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. BJOG. 2006 Feb;113(2):208–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00840.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00840.x.
    1. Glazener CM, MacArthur C, Hagen S, Elders A, Lancashire R, Herbison GP, Wilson PD, ProLong Study Group Twelve-year follow-up of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence and prolapse outcomes: randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):112–20. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12473. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12473.
    1. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog AR, Hjälmås K, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology. 2003 Oct;62(4 Suppl 1):16–23. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00755-6.
    1. Woodley SJ, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Hay-Smith EJ. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12:CD007471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub3.
    1. Borello-France DF, Burgio KL, Goode PS, Markland AD, Kenton K, Balasubramanyam A, Stoddard AM, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network Adherence to behavioral interventions for urge incontinence when combined with drug therapy: adherence rates, barriers, and predictors. Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;90(10):1493–505. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080387.
    1. Robert M, Ross S. No 186-conservative management of urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Feb;40(2):e119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.027.
    1. Boyle R, Hay-Smith EJ, Cody JD, Mørkved S. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and fecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Mar;33(3):269–76. doi: 10.1002/nau.22402.
    1. Bump RC, Hurt WG, Fantl JA, Wyman JF. Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Aug;165(2):322–7; discussion 327. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90085-6.
    1. Vermandel A, de Wachter S, Beyltjens T, D'Hondt D, Jacquemyn Y, Wyndaele JJ. Pelvic floor awareness and the positive effect of verbal instructions in 958 women early postdelivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):223–8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2483-x.
    1. Shaw C, Atwell C, Wood F, Brittain K, Williams K. A qualitative study of the assessment and treatment of incontinence in primary care. Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):461–7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm041.
    1. Wagg A, Duckett J, McClurg D, Harari D, Lowe D. To what extent are national guidelines for the management of urinary incontinence in women adhered? Data from a national audit. BJOG. 2011 Dec;118(13):1592–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03100.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03100.x.
    1. mHealth: New Horizons For Health Through Mobile Technologies. Second Global Survey on eHealth. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Nunes EF, Sampaio LM, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Nagano RC, Lucareli PR, Politti F. Biofeedback for pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2019 Dec;105(1):10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.012.
    1. Becker S, Miron-Shatz T, Schumacher N, Krocza J, Diamantidis C, Albrecht UV. mHealth 2.0: experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 May 16;2(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3328.
    1. Barbieri M, Andreoni G. mHealth market exploitation through the analysis of the related intellectual property rights. In: Andreoni G, Perego P, Frumento E, editors. m_Health Current and Future Applications. Munich: Springer; 2019. pp. 19–34.
    1. Vukovic V, Favaretti C, Ricciardi W, de Waure C. Health technology assessment evidence on e-health/m-health technologies: evaluating the transparency and thoroughness. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):87–96. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004512.
    1. Powell AC, Landman AB, Bates DW. In search of a few good apps. J Am Med Assoc. 2014 May 14;311(18):1851–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2564.
    1. Federal Communications Commission. 2014. [2019-06-27]. Equipment Authorization .
    1. EUR-Lex: EU Law. 2004. Directive 2004/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council .
    1. EUR-Lex: EU law. 2011. Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council .
    1. Harvey MA, Kristjansson B, Griffith D, Versi E. The incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory: a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):25–31. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116369.
    1. Salottolo K, Stahl E. Minimal clinically important improvement response in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee: short report from a survey of clinicians. J Orthop. 2018 Jun;15(2):424–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.034.
    1. Mørkved S, Bø K. Effect of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy and after childbirth on prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(4):299–310. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091758.
    1. Slieker-ten HM, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):295–300. doi: 10.1002/nau.20659.
    1. Dufour SP, Graham S, Friesen J, Rosenblat M, Rous C, Richardson J. Physiotherapists supporting self-management through health coaching: a mixed methods program evaluation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 Jan;31(1):29–38. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.930769.
    1. Kashanian M, Ali SS, Nazemi M, Bahasadri S. Evaluation of the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT or Kegel exercise) and assisted pelvic floor muscle training (APFMT) by a resistance device (Kegelmaster device) on the urinary incontinence in women: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):218–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.037.
    1. Kargar JM, Talebizadeh M, Mirzaei M. The effect of pelvic muscle exercises on urinary incontinency and self-esteem of elderly females with stress urinary incontinency, 2013. Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Sep 28;7(2):71–9. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p71. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p71.
    1. Harvey MA. Pelvic floor exercises during and after pregnancy: a systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Jun;25(6):487–98. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30310-3.
    1. Thorne S. Interpretive Description: Qualitative Research for Applied Practice. Second Edition. London: Routledge; 2016.
    1. Groutz A, Rimon E, Peled S, Gold R, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Gordon D. Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(1):2–6. doi: 10.1002/nau.10166.
    1. Viktrup L, Lose G. Lower urinary tract symptoms 5 years after the first delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000 Dec;11(6):336–40. doi: 10.1007/s001920070002.
    1. Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Levet C, Bénifla JL. Stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery: a retrospective cohort survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Oct;83(10):941–5. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00457.x.
    1. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Hunskaar S. Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. The Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002 Jun;20(2):102–7. doi: 10.1080/pri.20.2.102.107.
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Sixth Edition. Bristol, UK: International Continence Society; 2017.
    1. Ong TA, Khong SY, Ng KL, Ting JR, Kamal N, Yeoh WS, Yap NY, Razack AH. Using the vibrance Kegel device with pelvic floor muscle exercise for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled pilot study. Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):487–91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.022.
    1. Akter S, Ray P. mHealth - an ultimate platform to serve the unserved. Yearb Med Inform. 2010:94–100. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1638697.
    1. Kollmann A, Riedl M, Kastner P, Schreier G, Ludvik B. Feasibility of a mobile phone-based data service for functional insulin treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Dec 31;9(5):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e36.
    1. Walters DL, Sarela A, Fairfull A, Neighbour K, Cowen C, Stephens B, Sellwood T, Sellwood B, Steer M, Aust M, Francis R, Lee C, Hoffman S, Brealey G, Karunanithi M. A mobile phone-based care model for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the care assessment platform (CAP) BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Jan 28;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-5.
    1. Villalba E, Salvi D, Ottaviano M, Peinado I, Arredondo MT, Akay A. Wearable and mobile system to manage remotely heart failure. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009 Nov;13(6):990–6. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2026572.
    1. Rubel P, Fayn J, Nollo G, Assanelli D, Li B, Restier L, Adami S, Arod S, Atoui H, Ohlsson M, Simon-Chautemps L, Télisson D, Malossi C, Ziliani G, Galassi A, Edenbrandt L, Chevalier P. Toward personal eHealth in cardiology. Results from the EPI-MEDICS telemedicine project. J Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;38(4 Suppl):100–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.011.
    1. Kearney N, McCann L, Norrie J, Taylor L, Gray P, McGee-Lennon M, Sage M, Miller M, Maguire R. Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):437–44. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0515-0.
    1. Larsen ME, Rowntree J, Young AM, Pearson S, Smith J, Gibson OJ, Weaver A, Tarassenko L. Chemotherapy side-effect management using mobile phones. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5152–5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650374.
    1. Kim J, Kim S, Kim H, Kim K, Lee C, Yang S, Kong H, Shin Y, Lee K. Acceptability of the consumer-centric u-health services for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jun;18(5):329–38. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0140.
    1. Stragier J, Abeele MV, Mechant P, de Marez L. Understanding persistence in the use of online fitness communities: comparing novice and experienced users. Comput Human Behav. 2016 Nov;64:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.013.
    1. Malinowsky C, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Using a screening tool to evaluate potential use of e-health services for older people with and without cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(3):340–5. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.832731.
    1. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
    1. Zuchelo LT, Bezerra IM, da Silva AT, Gomes JM, Soares JJ, Chada BE, de Abreu LC, Sorpreso IC. Questionnaires to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction in the postpartum period: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:409–24. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S164266. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S164266.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe