Effect of Dupilumab in Korean Patients With Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST Sub-analysis

Chin Kook Rhee, Jung-Won Park, Heung-Woo Park, You Sook Cho, Chin Kook Rhee, Jung-Won Park, Heung-Woo Park, You Sook Cho

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of dupilumab on the annualized severe exacerbation rates, change in forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1), overall asthma control and health-related quality of life in Korean patients from the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study.

Methods: Of the 1,902 patients enrolled in the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study, a phase-3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study on dupilumab, 74 (4%) were Korean. The patients were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groups (2:2:1:1). The sub-analysis reported herewith was performed with the pooled groups of dupilumab and placebo from the 4 original treatment groups in the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study. The efficacy endpoints were annualized rate of severe exacerbation events during the 52-week study period and changes from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 in week 12. Asthma control, asthma quality of life and the effect of treatment on the levels of type 2 inflammatory biomarkers were assessed. The safety profile was also evaluated.

Results: In Korean patients, annualized severe exacerbation rates were reduced with dupilumab (n = 49) compared to placebo (n = 25) (0.259 vs 1.942) during the 52-week treatment period. The relative risk reduction with dupilumab was 87% (P < 0.001). Improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (mean difference of 0.24 L, P = 0.021) were observed in week 12 in dupilumab-treated patients. Additionally, improvements in asthma control and asthma-related quality of life were observed; the FeNO and serum immunoglobulin E levels were reduced. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable between the dupilumab and placebo group. A total of 11 patients from the dupilumab group reported 63 injection site reactions.

Conclusions: Dupilumab, as an add-on therapy in severe asthma, is efficacious and has an acceptable safety profile in Korean patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414854.

Keywords: Exacerbation; asthma; biological products; forced expiratory volume; quality of life; randomized controlled trial.

Conflict of interest statement

Chin Kook Rhee, Heung-Woo Park, You Sook Cho are on advisory panel on Sanofi Aventis Korea Jung-Won Park has no conflict of interest to declare.

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology • The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease.

Figures

Fig. 1. Reduction of annualized rate of…
Fig. 1. Reduction of annualized rate of severe exacerbations during the 52-week intervention period in (A) the Korean ITT population, (B) patients with the baseline blood eosinophil ≥ 150 cells/μL, and (C) patients with the baseline FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, for dupilumab vs. placebo.
ITT, intention-to-treat; CI, confidence interval; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; ppb, parts per billion.
Fig. 2. Magnitude of changes from the…
Fig. 2. Magnitude of changes from the baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 in week 12 in (A) the Korean ITT population, (B) patients with the baseline blood eosinophil ≥ 150 cells/μL, and (C) patients with the baseline FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, for dupilumab vs. placebo.
ITT, intention-to-treat; FEV1, forced expiratory volume at first second; LS, least squares; SE, standard error; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; ppb, parts per billion.
Fig. 3. Changes from the baseline in…
Fig. 3. Changes from the baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 during the 52-week intervention period in (A) the Korean ITT population, (B) patients with the baseline blood eosinophil ≥ 150 cells/µL, and (C) patients with the baseline FeNO ≥ 25 ppb for both dupilumab doses vs. both placebos combined.
LS, least squares; SE, standard error; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; ITT, intention-to-treat. *P ≤ 0.0001; †P ≤ 0.001; ‡P ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 4. Changes from the baseline in…
Fig. 4. Changes from the baseline in total asthma control (ACQ-5) scores during the 52-week intervention period in (A) the Korean ITT population, (B) patients with the baseline blood eosinophil ≥ 150 cells/µL, and (C) patients with the baseline FeNO ≥ 25 ppb for both dupilumab doses vs. both placebos combined.
LS, least squares; SE, standard error; ACQ-5, 5-item asthma control questionnaire; ITT, intention-to-treat; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide. *P < 0.001; †P < 0.05 vs. matched placebo.
Fig. 5. Changes from the baseline in…
Fig. 5. Changes from the baseline in asthma-related quality of life (AQLQ) scores during the 52-week intervention period in (A) the Korean ITT population, (B) Patients with the baseline blood eosinophil ≥ 150 cells/µL, and (C) Patients with the baseline FeNO ≥ 25 ppb for both dupilumab doses vs. both placebos combined.
LS, least squares; SE, standard error; AQLQ(S), Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; ITT, intention-to-treat; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide.

References

    1. Park SY, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Seo B, Kwon OY, Chang HS, et al. High prevalence of asthma in elderly women: findings from a Korean National Health Database and adult asthma cohort. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018;10:387–396.
    1. Jin HJ. Biological treatments for severe asthma. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020;37:262–268.
    1. Rathinam KK, Abraham JJ, Vijayakumar TM. Dupilumab in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma: an evidence-based review. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019;91:45–51.
    1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Dupixent prescribing information [Internet] Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food & Drug Administration; 2017. [cited 2020 Nov 3]. Available from: .
    1. European Medicines Agency. Prescribing information. Dupixent [Internet] Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2017. [cited 2021 Sep 14]. Available from: .
    1. McGregor MC, Krings JG, Nair P, Castro M. Role of biologics in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:433–445.
    1. Rabe KF, Nair P, Brusselle G, Maspero JF, Castro M, Sher L, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in glucocorticoid dependent severe asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2475–2485.
    1. Wenzel S, Ford L, Pearlman D, Spector S, Sher L, Skobieranda F, et al. Dupilumab in persistent asthma with elevated eosinophil levels. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2455–2466.
    1. Zayed Y, Kheiri B, Banifadel M, Hicks M, Aburahma A, Hamid K, et al. Dupilumab safety and efficacy in uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Asthma. 2019;56:1110–1119.
    1. Xiong XF, Zhu M, Wu HX, Fan LL, Cheng DY. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of uncontrolled asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Respir Res. 2019;20:108.
    1. Wenzel S, Castro M, Corren J, Maspero J, Wang L, Zhang B, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose-ranging trial. Lancet. 2016;388:31–44.
    1. Castro M, Corren J, Pavord ID, Maspero J, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2486–2496.
    1. Busse WW, Maspero JF, Rabe KF, Papi A, Wenzel SE, Ford LB, et al. Liberty Asthma QUEST: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate dupilumab efficacy/safety in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. Adv Ther. 2018;35:737–748.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report-3 [Internet] Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2019. [cited 2020 Nov 3]. Available from: .
    1. Tohda Y, Nakamura Y, Fujisawa T, Ebisawa M, Arima K, Miyata M, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma in the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study. Allergol Int. 2020;69:578–587.
    1. Kim BK, Park SY, Ban GY, Kim MA, Lee JH, An J, et al. Evaluation and management of difficult-to-treat and severe asthma: an expert opinion from the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the Working Group on severe asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020;12:910–933.
    1. Beck LA, Thaçi D, Hamilton JD, Graham NM, Bieber T, Rocklin R, et al. Dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:130–139.
    1. Bachert C, Mannent L, Naclerio RM, Mullol J, Ferguson BJ, Gevaert P, et al. Effect of subcutaneous dupilumab on nasal polyp burden in patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:469–479.
    1. Weinstein SF, Katial R, Jayawardena S, Pirozzi G, Staudinger H, Eckert L, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in perennial allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142:171–177.e1.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe