A Coaching by Telephone Intervention on Engaging Patients to Address Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Eugene Z Oddone, Jennifer M Gierisch, Linda L Sanders, Angela Fagerlin, Jordan Sparks, Felicia McCant, Carrie May, Maren K Olsen, Laura J Damschroder, Eugene Z Oddone, Jennifer M Gierisch, Linda L Sanders, Angela Fagerlin, Jordan Sparks, Felicia McCant, Carrie May, Maren K Olsen, Laura J Damschroder

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of deaths and chronic illnesses can be attributed to three modifiable risk factors: tobacco use, overweight/obesity, and physical inactivity.

Objective: To test whether telephone-based health coaching after completion of a comprehensive health risk assessment (HRA) increases patient activation and enrollment in a prevention program compared to HRA completion alone.

Design: Two-arm randomized trial at three sites.

Setting: Primary care clinics at Veterans Affairs facilities.

Participants: Four hundred seventeen veterans with at least one modifiable risk factor (BMI ≥ 30, < 150 min of at least moderate physically activity per week, or current smoker).

Intervention: Participants completed an online HRA. Intervention participants received two telephone-delivered health coaching calls at 1 and 4 weeks to collaboratively set goals to enroll in, and attend structured prevention programs designed to reduce modifiable risk factors.

Measurements: Primary outcome was enrollment in a structured prevention program by 6 months. Secondary outcomes were Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Framingham Risk Score (FRS).

Results: Most participants were male (85%), white (50%), with a mean age of 56. Participants were eligible, because their BMI was ≥ 30 (80%), they were physically inactive (50%), and/or they were current smokers (39%). When compared to HLA only at 6 months, health coaching intervention participants reported higher rates of enrollment in a prevention program, 51 vs 29% (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.9; p < 0.0001), higher rates of program participation, 40 vs 23% (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.6; p = 0.0004), and greater improvement in PAM scores, mean difference 2.5 (95% CI: 0.2, 4.7; p = 0.03), but no change in FRS scores, mean difference 0.7 (95% CI - 0.7, 2.2; p = 0.33).

Conclusions: Brief telephone health coaching after completing an online HRA increased patient activation and increased enrollment in structured prevention programs to improve health behaviors. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov identifier: NCT01828567.

Keywords: health risk assessment; patient engagement; telephone coaching.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram showing screening, enrollment, and follow-up.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe