Transmission reduction and prevention with HPV vaccination (TRAP-HPV) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of HPV vaccination in preventing transmission of HPV infection in heterosexual couples

Aaron MacCosham, Mariam El-Zein, Ann N Burchell, Pierre-Paul Tellier, François Coutlée, Eduardo L Franco, Aaron MacCosham, Mariam El-Zein, Ann N Burchell, Pierre-Paul Tellier, François Coutlée, Eduardo L Franco

Abstract

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a causal agent of malignancies including cervical, vulvar, vaginal, penile, anal and oropharyngeal cancer, as well as benign conditions such as anogenital warts. HPV vaccination protects individuals against infections with the target HPV types and their clinical outcomes. However, little is known about the protection an immunised individual confers to their sexual partner or its impact on HPV transmission dynamics. In this context, the Transmission Reduction and Prevention with HPV vaccination (TRAP-HPV) study was designed to determine the efficacy of an HPV vaccine in reducing transmission of genital and oral HPV infection in sexual partners of vaccinated individuals.

Methods and analysis: The TRAP-HPV study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial among heterosexual couples living in Montreal, Canada. Sexually active couples, aged between 18 and 45 years, who have been in a relationship no longer than 6 months are considered eligible. Participants are independently randomised to receive either the intervention HPV vaccine, Gardasil 9, or a placebo hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim, creating four vaccination groups among couples: intervention-intervention, intervention-placebo, placebo-intervention and the placebo-placebo. Participants provide genital (vaginal/penile) and oral samples at baseline and five follow-up visits over a 1-year duration. Linear Array HPV genotyping is used to detect 36 HPV types. Cox proportional hazard regression models will be used to estimate the effect of vaccination on HPV transmission.

Ethics and dissemination: The TRAP-HPV study received ethical approval by institutional review boards McGill University, Concordia University and Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. Before enrolment, all participants provide informed written consent. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. The generated empirical evidence could be used in mathematical models of vaccination to inform policymakers in Canada and elsewhere.

Trial registration number: NCT01824537.

Keywords: epidemiology; infection control; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TRAP-HPV study group: Affiliated with the Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada: Allita Rodrigues (study coordinator); Natalia Morykon and Raphaela Rodrigues (management of subject participation and specimen collection); Sheila Bouten and Samantha Shapiro (data management). Affiliated with the Département de Microbiologie Médicale et Infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada: Julie Guénoun (HPV testing and genotyping).

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and time points of data collection. Participants in a relationship no longer than 6 months are enrolled in the study. The assigned vaccination regimen is administered at the 0, 2 and 6 months marks. oral, penile, penile (men) and vaginal (women) samples are collected from participants at every study visit. Blood samples are collected from participants only at enrolment. HPV, human papillomavirus.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Human papillomaviruses. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. risks to humans 2007;90:468–71.
    1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. . Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12–19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>;2-F
    1. Burchell AN, Winer RL, de Sanjosé S, et al. . Chapter 6: epidemiology and transmission dynamics of genital HPV infection. Vaccine 2006;24 Suppl 3:S52–61. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.031
    1. Wissing MD, Burchell AN, El-Zein M, et al. . Vaccination of young women decreases human papillomavirus transmission in heterosexual couples: findings from the Hitch cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28:1825–34. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0618
    1. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, et al. . Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1757–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17398-4
    1. Garland SM, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, et al. . Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1928–43. 10.1056/NEJMoa061760
    1. Joura EA, Giuliano AR, Iversen O-E, et al. . A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women. N Engl J Med 2015;372:711–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1405044
    1. Monk BJ, Tewari KS. The spectrum and clinical sequelae of human papillomavirus infection. Gynecol Oncol 2007;107:S6–13. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.076
    1. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, et al. . Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:518–27. 10.1056/NEJMoa021641
    1. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. . Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007;370:890–907. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;13:1501–7.
    1. Spanier GB. Measuring Dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 1976;38:15–28. 10.2307/350547
    1. Graham JM, Liu YJ, Jeziorski JL. The Dyadic adjustment scale: a reliability generalization meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam 2006;68:701–17. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x
    1. Baillargeon J, Dubois G, Marineau R. Traduction française de l’Échelle d’ajustement dyadique [French translation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Rev Can des Sci du Comport 1986;18:25–35.
    1. Dias D, Van Doren J, Schlottmann S, et al. . Optimization and validation of a multiplexed Luminex assay to quantify antibodies to neutralizing epitopes on human papillomaviruses 6, 11, 16, and 18. CVI 2005;12:959–69. 10.1128/CDLI.12.8.959-969.2005
    1. Opalka D, Lachman CE, MacMullen SA, et al. . Simultaneous quantitation of antibodies to neutralizing epitopes on virus-like particles for human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18 by a multiplexed Luminex assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:108–15. 10.1128/CDLI.10.1.108-115.2003
    1. Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Pawlita M, et al. . Human papillomavirus and oral cancer: the International agency for research on cancer multicenter study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1772–83. 10.1093/jnci/djg107
    1. Macaluso M, Lawson ML, Hortin G, et al. . Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:289–97. 10.1093/aje/kwf212
    1. Gravitt PE, Lacey JV, Brinton LA, et al. . Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:95–100.
    1. Wright TC, Denny L, Kuhn L, et al. . Hpv DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer. JAMA 2000;283:81–6. 10.1001/jama.283.1.81
    1. Bleeker MCG, Hogewoning CJA, Van Den Brule AJC, et al. . Penile lesions and human papillomavirus in male sexual partners of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:351–7. 10.1067/mjd.2002.122198
    1. Weaver BA, Feng Q, Holmes KK, et al. . Evaluation of genital sites and sampling techniques for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in men. J Infect Dis 2004;189:677–85. 10.1086/381395
    1. Baldwin SB, Wallace DR, Papenfuss MR, et al. . Human papillomavirus infection in men attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Infect Dis 2003;187:1064–70. 10.1086/368220
    1. Habis AH, Vernon SD, Lee DR, et al. . Molecular quality of exfoliated cervical cells: implications for molecular epidemiology and biomarker discovery. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:492–6.
    1. Coutlée F, Rouleau D, Petignat P, et al. . Enhanced detection and typing of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in anogenital samples with PGMY primers and the linear array HPV genotyping test. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:1998–2006. 10.1128/JCM.00104-06
    1. Bernstein D, Lagakos SW. Sample size and power determination for stratified clinical trials. J Stat Comput Simul 1978;8:65–73. 10.1080/00949657808810249
    1. Burchell AN, Tellier P-P, Hanley J, et al. . Influence of partner's infection status on prevalent human papillomavirus among persons with a new sex partner. Sex Transm Dis 2010;37:34–40. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b35693
    1. Burchell AN, Tellier P-P, Hanley J, et al. . Human papillomavirus infections among couples in new sexual relationships. Epidemiology 2010;21:31–7. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c1e70b
    1. Burchell AN, Coutlée F, Tellier P-P, et al. . Genital transmission of human papillomavirus in recently formed heterosexual couples. J Infect Dis 2011;204:1723–9. 10.1093/infdis/jir644
    1. LIANG K-YEE, ZEGER SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22. 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
    1. Xue X, Gange SJ, Zhong Y, et al. . Marginal and mixed-effects models in the analysis of human papillomavirus natural history data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:159–69. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0546
    1. Lan KK, Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Use of spending functions for occasional or continuous monitoring of data in clinical trials. Stat Med 1993;12:2219–31. 10.1002/sim.4780122307
    1. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549. 10.2307/2530245
    1. Widdice L, Ma Y, Jonte J, et al. . Concordance and transmission of human papillomavirus within heterosexual couples observed over short intervals. J Infect Dis 2013;207:1286–94. 10.1093/infdis/jit018
    1. Mbulawa ZZA, Johnson LF, Marais DJ, et al. . The impact of human immunodeficiency virus on human papillomavirus transmission in heterosexually active couples. J Infect 2013;67:51–8. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.03.009
    1. Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, et al. . Transmission of human papillomavirus in heterosexual couples. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:888–94. 10.3201/eid1406.0706162
    1. Nyitray AG, Lin H-Y, Fulp WJ, et al. . The role of monogamy and duration of heterosexual relationships in human papillomavirus transmission. J Infect Dis 2014;209:1007–15. 10.1093/infdis/jit615
    1. Su Y, Wei F, Huang X, et al. . Prevalence, concordance, and transmission of human papillomavirus infection among heterosexual couples in Liuzhou, China: an observational perspective study. J Infect Dis 2019;220:980–9. 10.1093/infdis/jiz224
    1. Liu M, He Z, Zhang C, et al. . Transmission of genital human papillomavirus infection in couples: a population-based cohort study in rural China. Sci Rep 2015;5:1–10. 10.1038/srep10986
    1. El-Zein M, Coutlée F, Tellier P-P, et al. . Human papillomavirus infection and transmission among couples through heterosexual activity (Hitch) cohort study: protocol describing design, methods, and research goals. JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8:e11284. 10.2196/11284
    1. Brisson M, Van de Velde N, De Wals P, et al. . The potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada. Vaccine 2007;25:5399–408. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.086
    1. Goldie SJ, Kohli M, Grima D, et al. . Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:604–15. 10.1093/jnci/djh104
    1. Hughes JP, Garnett GP, Koutsky L. The theoretical population-level impact of a prophylactic human papilloma virus vaccine. Epidemiology 2002;13:631–9. 10.1097/00001648-200211000-00006
    1. Diaz M, Kim JJ, Albero G, et al. . Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India. Br J Cancer 2008;99:230–8. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604462
    1. Elbasha EH, Dasbach EJ, Insinga RP. Model for assessing human papillomavirus vaccination strategies. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:28–41. 10.3201/eid1301.060438
    1. Taira AV, Neukermans CP, Sanders GD. Evaluating human papillomavirus vaccination programs. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1915–23. 10.3201/eid1011.040222
    1. Brisson M, van de Velde N, Franco EL, et al. . Incremental impact of adding boys to current human papillomavirus vaccination programs: role of herd immunity. J Infect Dis 2011;204:372–6. 10.1093/infdis/jir285
    1. Ferko N, Postma M, Gallivan S, et al. . Evolution of the health economics of cervical cancer vaccination. Vaccine 2008;26 Suppl 5:F3–15. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.004
    1. Castellsagué X, Muñoz N, Pitisuttithum P, et al. . End-of-study safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in adult women 24-45 years of age. Br J Cancer 2011;105:28–37. 10.1038/bjc.2011.185

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe