Estimates of outcomes up to ten years after stroke: analysis from the prospective South London Stroke Register

Charles D A Wolfe, Siobhan L Crichton, Peter U Heuschmann, Christopher J McKevitt, André M Toschke, Andy P Grieve, Anthony G Rudd, Charles D A Wolfe, Siobhan L Crichton, Peter U Heuschmann, Christopher J McKevitt, André M Toschke, Andy P Grieve, Anthony G Rudd

Abstract

Background: Although stroke is acknowledged as a long-term condition, population estimates of outcomes longer term are lacking. Such estimates would be useful for planning health services and developing research that might ultimately improve outcomes. This burden of disease study provides population-based estimates of outcomes with a focus on disability, cognition, and psychological outcomes up to 10 y after initial stroke event in a multi-ethnic European population.

Methods and findings: Data were collected from the population-based South London Stroke Register, a prospective population-based register documenting all first in a lifetime strokes since 1 January 1995 in a multi-ethnic inner city population. The outcomes assessed are reported as estimates of need and included disability (Barthel Index <15), inactivity (Frenchay Activities Index <15), cognitive impairment (Abbreviated Mental Test < 8 or Mini-Mental State Exam <24), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale >10), and mental and physical domain scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item short form (SF-12) health survey. Estimates were stratified by age, gender, and ethnicity, and age-adjusted using the standard European population. Plots of outcome estimates over time were constructed to examine temporal trends and sociodemographic differences. Between 1995 and 2006, 3,373 first-ever strokes were registered: 20%-30% of survivors had a poor outcome over 10 y of follow-up. The highest rate of disability was observed 7 d after stroke and remained at around 110 per 1,000 stroke survivors from 3 mo to 10 y. Rates of inactivity and cognitive impairment both declined up to 1 y (280/1,000 and 180/1,000 survivors, respectively); thereafter rates of inactivity remained stable till year eight, then increased, whereas rates of cognitive impairment fluctuated till year eight, then increased. Anxiety and depression showed some fluctuation over time, with a rate of 350 and 310 per 1,000 stroke survivors, respectively. SF-12 scores showed little variation from 3 mo to 10 y after stroke. Inactivity was higher in males at all time points, and in white compared to black stroke survivors, although black survivors reported better outcomes in the SF-12 physical domain. No other major differences were observed by gender or ethnicity. Increased age was associated with higher rates of disability, inactivity, and cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Between 20% and 30% of stroke survivors have a poor range of outcomes up to 10 y after stroke. Such epidemiological data demonstrate the sociodemographic groups that are most affected longer term and should be used to develop longer term management strategies that reduce the significant poor outcomes of this group, for whom effective interventions are currently elusive. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Conflict of interest statement

APG has consultancy agreements with Pfizer Global R&D, Takeda Global R&D (Europe), Cytel, Novartis, GSK, Viphor, Helsinn, and Eli Lilly. PUH has in the past 5 years had unrestricted research grants in the area of stroke from the German Ministry of Research and Education, the European Union, the Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation, the University of Erlangen, and the German Stroke Foundation. AMT, named as a contributing author on this paper, died before the paper was formally accepted for publication. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow chart showing the number…
Figure 1. Flow chart showing the number of participants included at each follow-up time point.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates with 95%…
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per…
Figure 3. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per 1,000 stroke suvivors, with 95% pointwise confidence intervals.
HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Figure 4. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per…
Figure 4. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per 1,000 stroke suvivors by gender.
HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Figure 5. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per…
Figure 5. Age-adjusted rates of outcome per 1,000 stroke suvivors and mean SF-12 scores by ethnicity.
HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Figure 6. Rates of outcome per 1,000…
Figure 6. Rates of outcome per 1,000 stroke suvivors and mean SF-12 scores by age.
HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

References

    1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367:1747–1757.
    1. Department of Health. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 2007. National stroke strategy. Available: . Accessed 8 April 2011.
    1. Anderson CS, Carter KN, Brownlee WJ, Hackett ML, Broad JB, et al. Very long-term outcome after stroke in Auckland, New Zealand. Stroke. 2004;35:1920–1924.
    1. Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke: results from the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000;31:440–447.
    1. Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Kotila M, Waltimo O. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1101–1107.
    1. Paul SL, Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RA, et al. Long-term outcome in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study: predictors of quality of life at 5 years after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2082–2086.
    1. Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth community stroke study, 1989-1990. Stroke. 2002;33:1034–1040.
    1. Patel MD, Tilling K, Lawrence E, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA, et al. Relationships between long-term stroke disability, handicap and health-related quality of life. Age Ageing. 2007;35:273–279.
    1. Wilkinson PR, Wolfe CDA, Warburton FG, Rudd AG, Howard RS, et al. A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. Stroke. 1997;28:507–512.
    1. Heuschmann PU, Grieve AP, Toschke AM, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Ethnic group disparities in 10-year trends in stroke incidence and vascular risk factors: The South London Stroke Register (SLSR). Stroke. 2008;39:2204–2210.
    1. Wolfe CD, Rudd AG, Howard R, Coshall C, Stewart J, et al. Incidence and case fatality rates of stroke subtypes in a multiethnic population: the South London Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:211–216.
    1. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64–67.
    1. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer J. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. Boston: The Health Assessment Laboratory; 1994. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. Lincoln (Rhode Island): Quality Metric Incorporated; 1998. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales, 3rd edition.
    1. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-mental state”: A practical method of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198.
    1. Hodkinson H. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1972;1:233–238.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370.
    1. Wolfe CDA, Taub NA, Woodrow J, Burney PGJ. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients. Stroke. 1991;22:1242–1244.
    1. Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Broadhurst RJ, Stewart-Wynne EG. Predicting survival for 1 year among different subtypes of stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1935–1944.
    1. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, Lau F, Noseworthy T. Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke. 1999;30:1213–1217.
    1. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–935.
    1. Jitapunkul S, Pillay I, Ebrahim S. The abbreviated mental test: its use and validity. Age Ageing. 1991;20:332–336.
    1. Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002;43:386–393.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77.
    1. Craig R, Mindell J. Volume 1, General health and function. London: National Health Service; 2005. Health survey for England 2005: health of older people. Available: . Accessed 8 April 2011.
    1. The MedicAgeing Study. Cognitive function and dementia in six areas of England and Wales: the distribution of MMSE and prevalence of GMS organicity level in the MRC CFA Study. Psychol Med. 1998;28:319–335.
    1. Rait G, Fletcher A, Smeeth L, Brayne C, Stirling S, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community. Age Ageing. 2005;34:242–248.
    1. Lindesay J, Briggs K, Murphy E. The Guy's/Age Concern survey. Prevalence rates of cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety in an urban elderly community. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;155:317–329.
    1. McDougall FA, Kvaal K, Matthews FE, Paykel E, Jones PB, et al. Prevalence of depression in older people in England and Wales: the MRC CFA Study. Psychol Med. 2007;37:1787–1795.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1171–1178.
    1. Clopper C, Pearson S. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–413.
    1. Sharp L, Black RJ, Harkness EF, Finlayson AR, Muir CS. Edinburgh: Information and Statistics Division, Directorate of Information Services, National Health Service; 1993. Cancer registration statistics, Scotland 1981–1990.
    1. StataCorp. College Station (Texas): StataCorp; 2007. Stata statistical software: release 10.
    1. R Development Core Team. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
    1. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jóźwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, et al. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:581–598.
    1. McKevitt C, Coshall C, Tilling K, Wolfe C. Are there inequalities in the provision of stroke care? Analysis of an inner-city stroke register. Stroke. 2005;36:315–320.
    1. Dhamoon M, Moon Y, Paik M, Boden-Albala B, Rundek T, et al. Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:2805–2811.
    1. Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehab. 2003;17:158–166.
    1. Hackett ML, Yapa C, Parag V, Anderson CS. Frequency of depression after stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke. 2005;36:1330–1340.
    1. Chausson N, Olindo S, Cabre P, Saint-Vil M, Smadja D. Five year outcome of a stroke cohort in Martinique, French West Indies. Stroke. 2010;41:594–599.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe