Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study

Silvia Stringhini, Ania Wisniak, Giovanni Piumatti, Andrew S Azman, Stephen A Lauer, Hélène Baysson, David De Ridder, Dusan Petrovic, Stephanie Schrempft, Kailing Marcus, Sabine Yerly, Isabelle Arm Vernez, Olivia Keiser, Samia Hurst, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Didier Trono, Didier Pittet, Laurent Gétaz, François Chappuis, Isabella Eckerle, Nicolas Vuilleumier, Benjamin Meyer, Antoine Flahault, Laurent Kaiser, Idris Guessous, Silvia Stringhini, Ania Wisniak, Giovanni Piumatti, Andrew S Azman, Stephen A Lauer, Hélène Baysson, David De Ridder, Dusan Petrovic, Stephanie Schrempft, Kailing Marcus, Sabine Yerly, Isabelle Arm Vernez, Olivia Keiser, Samia Hurst, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Didier Trono, Didier Pittet, Laurent Gétaz, François Chappuis, Isabella Eckerle, Nicolas Vuilleumier, Benjamin Meyer, Antoine Flahault, Laurent Kaiser, Idris Guessous

Abstract

Background: Assessing the burden of COVID-19 on the basis of medically attended case numbers is suboptimal given its reliance on testing strategy, changing case definitions, and disease presentation. Population-based serosurveys measuring anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) antibodies provide one method for estimating infection rates and monitoring the progression of the epidemic. Here, we estimate weekly seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the population of Geneva, Switzerland, during the epidemic.

Methods: The SEROCoV-POP study is a population-based study of former participants of the Bus Santé study and their household members. We planned a series of 12 consecutive weekly serosurveys among randomly selected participants from a previous population-representative survey, and their household members aged 5 years and older. We tested each participant for anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies using a commercially available ELISA. We estimated seroprevalence using a Bayesian logistic regression model taking into account test performance and adjusting for the age and sex of Geneva's population. Here we present results from the first 5 weeks of the study.

Findings: Between April 6 and May 9, 2020, we enrolled 2766 participants from 1339 households, with a demographic distribution similar to that of the canton of Geneva. In the first week, we estimated a seroprevalence of 4·8% (95% CI 2·4-8·0, n=341). The estimate increased to 8·5% (5·9-11·4, n=469) in the second week, to 10·9% (7·9-14·4, n=577) in the third week, 6·6% (4·3-9·4, n=604) in the fourth week, and 10·8% (8·2-13·9, n=775) in the fifth week. Individuals aged 5-9 years (relative risk [RR] 0·32 [95% CI 0·11-0·63]) and those older than 65 years (RR 0·50 [0·28-0·78]) had a significantly lower risk of being seropositive than those aged 20-49 years. After accounting for the time to seroconversion, we estimated that for every reported confirmed case, there were 11·6 infections in the community.

Interpretation: These results suggest that most of the population of Geneva remained uninfected during this wave of the pandemic, despite the high prevalence of COVID-19 in the region (5000 reported clinical cases over <2·5 months in the population of half a million people). Assuming that the presence of IgG antibodies is associated with immunity, these results highlight that the epidemic is far from coming to an end by means of fewer susceptible people in the population. Further, a significantly lower seroprevalence was observed for children aged 5-9 years and adults older than 65 years, compared with those aged 10-64 years. These results will inform countries considering the easing of restrictions aimed at curbing transmission.

Funding: Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Swiss School of Public Health (Corona Immunitas research program), Fondation de Bienfaisance du Groupe Pictet, Fondation Ancrage, Fondation Privée des Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, and Center for Emerging Viral Diseases.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Seroprevalence estimates and 95% CIs for each week of the survey (A), daily confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in Geneva (B), and cumulative case counts per day and cumulative incidence rate of confirmed COVID-19 (C) Red shading shows the sampling periods for each survey round.

References

    1. Roda WC, Varughese MB, Han D, Li MY. Why is it difficult to accurately predict the COVID-19 epidemic? Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:271–281.
    1. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:669–677.
    1. Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19 - studies needed. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1194–1196.
    1. WHO Population-based age-stratified seroepidemiological investigation protocol for COVID-19 virus infection. March 17, 2020.
    1. République et canton de Genève COVID-19: situation épidémiologique à Genève. June 4, 2020.
    1. Guessous I, Gaspoz JM, Theler JM, Wolff H. High prevalence of forgoing healthcare for economic reasons in Switzerland: a population-based study in a region with universal health insurance coverage. Prev Med. 2012;55:521–527.
    1. de Mestral C, Stringhini S, Guessous I, Jornayvaz FR. Thirteen-year trends in the prevalence of diabetes in an urban region of Switzerland: a population-based study. Diabet Med. 2019 doi: 10.1111/dme.14206. published online Dec 8.
    1. Guessous I, Gaspoz J-M, Theler J-M, Kayser B. Eleven-year physical activity trends in a Swiss urban area. Prev Med. 2014;59:25–30.
    1. Le Conseil Fédéral Ordonnance 2 sur les mesures destinées à lutter contre le coronavirus (COVID-19) March 13, 2020.
    1. Meyer B, Torriani G, Yerly S. Validation of a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassay. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.02.20080879. published online May 6. (preprint).
    1. République et canton de Genève Statistiques cantonales. T01.01.8.01: Population résidante selon l'origine, le sexe, le groupe d'âges et l'état matrimonial, depuis 2013.
    1. Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J Stat Softw. 2017;76:1–29.
    1. Guo G, Zhao H. Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:441–462.
    1. Gelman A, Meng X-L, Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat Sin. 1996;6:733–760.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: April 28, 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Situation report—99.
    1. Mizumoto K, Omori R, Nishiura H. Age specificity of cases and attack rate of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.09.20033142. published March 13. (preprint).
    1. Li W, Zhang B, Lu J. The characteristics of household transmission of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa450. published online April 17.
    1. Zhang J, Litvinova M, Liang Y. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science. 2020 doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001. published online April 29.
    1. Jing Q-L, Liu M-J, Yuan J. Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.11.20056010. published online April 15. (preprint).
    1. Pawelec G, Weng NP. Can an effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be developed for the older population? Immun Ageing. 2020;17:8.
    1. Bryant JE, Azman AS, Ferrari MJ. Serology for SARS-CoV-2: apprehensions, opportunities, and the path forward. Sci Immunol. 2020;5
    1. EuroHealthNet What COVID-19 is teaching us about inequality and the sustainability of our health systems.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 in racial and ethnic minority groups. Feb 11, 2020.
    1. Gobierno de España. Ministerio de Sanidad Estudio ENE-COVID19: primera ronda. Estudio nacional de sero-epidemiología de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en España. May 13, 2020 (in Spanish)
    1. Saplakoglu Y. 1 in 5 people tested in New York City had antibodies for the coronavirus. LiveScience. April 23, 2020.
    1. Patel AB, Verma A. Nasal ACE2 levels and COVID-19 in children. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8946. published online May 20.
    1. Davies NG, Klepac P, Liu Y, Prem K, Jit M, Eggo RM. Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.24.20043018. published online May 3. (preprint).

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe