Effects of a Web-Based, Evolutionary Mismatch-Framed Intervention Targeting Physical Activity and Diet: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Elisabeth B Grey, Dylan Thompson, Fiona B Gillison, Elisabeth B Grey, Dylan Thompson, Fiona B Gillison

Abstract

Background: This study sought to test the effectiveness of a 12-week, novel online intervention (Evolife) aiming to increase physical activity level (PAL) and reduce energy intake (EI) among overweight/obese adults. The intervention used an evolutionary mismatch message to frame health information in an engaging way, incorporating evidence-based behaviour change techniques to promote autonomous motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulatory skills.

Method: Men and women aged 35-74 years with a BMI of 25-40 kg/m2 were eligible. Participants were randomised to receive either the intervention (comprising a face-to-face introductory session, 12 weeks' access to the Evolife website and a pedometer) or a control condition (face-to-face introductory session and NHS online health resources). PAL was measured objectively and EI was self-reported using 3-day weighed food records. Secondary measures included BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure.

Results: Sixty people met inclusion criteria; 59 (30 intervention) completed the trial (mean age = 50; 56% male). Differences between groups' change scores for PAL and EI were of small effect size but did not reach significance (d = 0.32 and d = - 0.49, respectively). Improvements were found in both groups for PAL (int: d = 0.33; control: d = 0.04), EI (int: d = - 0.81; control: d = - 0.16), waist circumference (int: d = - 0.30; control: d = - 0.17) and systolic blood pressure (int: d = - 0.67; control: d = - 0.28).

Conclusion: The intervention did not lead to significantly greater improvement in PAL or reduction in EI than a minimal intervention control, although the changes in the intervention group were of meaningful effect size and comparable with positive outcomes in larger intervention trials.

Trial registration: This trail was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov on 16 January 2017 (appeared online 26 January 2017), reference NCT03032731.

Keywords: Behaviour change; Diet; Physical activity; Randomised controlled trial; Web-based intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram of Evolife trial

References

    1. World Health Organization and the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases; Report of the joint WHO/FAO expert consultation, Geneva, 28 January - 1 February 2002. Geneva, Switzerland; 2003.
    1. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, et al. Tackling obesities: future choices - project report. London: Department of Innovation Universities and Skills; 2007.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: World Health Organisation. p. 2013.
    1. World Health Organization . Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. France: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Cavill N, Ells L. Treating adult obesity through lifestyle change interventions. A briefing paper for commissioners. National Obesity Observatory: Oxford; 2010.
    1. Tang JCH, Abraham C, Greaves CJ, Nikolaou V. Self-directed interventions to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;1–15. 10.1080/17437199.2016.1172979.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Behaviour change: the principles for effective interventions. Public health guideline [PH6]: Available at: . 2007 Contract No.: 6.
    1. Vandelanotte C, Müller AM, Short CE, et al. Past, Present, and Future of eHealth and mHealth research to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(3):219–28.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.12.006.
    1. Hou S-I, Charlery S-AR, Roberson K. Systematic literature review of Internet interventions across health behaviors. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014;2(1):455–481. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.895368.
    1. Schoeppe S, Alley S, Van Lippevelde W, et al. Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0454-y.
    1. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2665.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Preventing type 2 diabetes. Public health guideline [PH38]: Available at: . 2012 Contract No.: PH38.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Cardiovascular disease prevention. Public Health guideline [PH25]: Available at: . 2010 Contract No.: PH25.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obesity: identification, assessment and management. Clinical guideline [CG189]: Available at: . 2014 November.
    1. Leonard WR. Lifestyle, diet and disease: comparative perspectives on the determinants of chronic health risks. In: Stearns SC, Koella JC, editors. Evolution in health and disease. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 265–276.
    1. Konner M, Eaton SB. Paleolithic nutrition: twenty-five years later. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(6):594–602. doi: 10.1177/0884533610385702.
    1. Grey EB, Gillison F, Thompson D. Can evolutionary mismatch help generate interest in health promotion messages? Health Educ J. 2018;0017896918754923. 10.1177/0017896918754923.
    1. Crutzen R, Ruiter RAC, de Vries NK. Can interest and enjoyment help to increase use of Internet-delivered interventions? Psychol Health. 2014;29(11):1227–1244. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.921300.
    1. Short C, Rebar A, Plotnikoff RC, Vandelanotte C. Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. Eur Health Psychol. 2015;17(1):32–38.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28(6):690–701. doi: 10.1037/a0016136.
    1. Greaves C, Sheppard K, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-119.
    1. Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, Johnston M, MacLennan G, Araújo-Soares V. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6(1):7–32. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.513298.
    1. Treasure T, MacRae KD. Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? Br Med J. 1998;317(7155):362–363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.362.
    1. Western MJ. Using personalised multidimensional visual feedback to support a change in physical activity behaviour and improve health [Doctoral thesis]: University of Bath; 2017.
    1. Taves DR. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;15(5):443–453. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443.
    1. Hopkins WG. A spreadsheet to reduce differences between group means of subject characteristics in a controlled trial: minimize means as recruit. .
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Behaviour change: individual approaches. Public health guideline [PH49]: Available at: . 2014.
    1. Welk GJ, McClain JJ, Eisenmann JC, Wickel EE. Field validation of the MTI actigraph and BodyMedia armband monitor using the IDEEA monitor. Obesity. 2007;15(4):918–928. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.624.
    1. Johannsen DL, Calabro MA, Stewart J, Franke W, Rood JC, Welk GJ. Accuracy of armband monitors for measuring daily energy expenditure in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(11):2134–2140. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0b3ff.
    1. Berntsen S, Hageberg R, Aandstad A, et al. Validity of physical activity monitors in adults participating in free-living activities. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(9):657–664. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.048868.
    1. Scheers T, Philippaerts R, Lefevre J. Variability in physical activity patterns as measured by the SenseWear armband: how many days are needed? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(5):1653–1662. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2131-9.
    1. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Clin Nutr. 1985;39(S1):5–41.
    1. World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: Report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 8-11 December 2008.
    1. van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D-3L user guide. Rotterdam: EuroQol Group; 2015.
    1. Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Loitz CC, Scime G. It's who I am … really!’ the importance of integrated regulation in exercise contexts. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2006;11(2):79–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9861.2006.tb00021.x.
    1. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26(2):191–196. doi: 10.1123/jsep.26.2.191.
    1. McAuley E. The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. J Behav Med. 1992;15(1):65–88.
    1. Pawlak R, Colby S. Benefits, barriers, self-efficacy and knowledge regarding healthy foods; perception of African Americans living in eastern North Carolina. Nutr Res Pract. 2009;3(1):56–63. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2009.3.1.56.
    1. Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005;35(4):565–576. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.258.
    1. Gillison F, Stathi A, Reddy P, Perry R, Taylor G, Bennett P, Dunbar J, Greaves C. Processes of behavior change and weight loss in a theory-based weight loss intervention program: a test of the process model for lifestyle behavior change. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0160-6.
    1. IBM Corp . IBM SPSS statistics for Windows. 22.0 ed. IBM Corp: Armonk; 2013.
    1. Laird N. Further comparative analyses of pretest-posttest research designs. Am Stat. 1983;37(4):329–330. doi: 10.2307/2682785.
    1. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise sciencE. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–12. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278.
    1. Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23(6):662–674. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8.
    1. Davies CA, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-52.
    1. Greaves C, Gillison F, Stathi A, et al. Waste the waist: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a primary care based intervention to support lifestyle change in people with high cardiovascular risk. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0159-z.
    1. BPLTT Collaboration Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1527–1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14739-3.
    1. Wong GWK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of nonselective beta-blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2. 10.1002/14651858.CD007452.pub2.
    1. Fife-Schaw C, Abraham C. How much behaviour change should we expect from health promotion campaigns targeting cognitions? An approach to pre-intervention assessment. Psychol Health. 2009;24(7):763–776. doi: 10.1080/08870440801956184.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe