Agricultural lung diseases

S R Kirkhorn, V F Garry, S R Kirkhorn, V F Garry

Abstract

Agriculture is considered one of the most hazardous occupations. Organic dusts and toxic gases constitute some of the most common and potentially disabling occupational and environmental hazards. The changing patterns of agriculture have paradoxically contributed to both improved working conditions and increased exposure to respiratory hazards. Animal confinement operations with increasing animal density, particularly swine confinement, have contributed significantly to increased intensity and duration of exposure to indoor air toxins. Ongoing research has implicated bacterial endotoxins, fungal spores, and the inherent toxicity of grain dusts as causes of upper and lower airway inflammation and as immunologic agents in both grain and animal production. Animal confinement gases, particularly ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, have been implicated as additional sources of respiratory irritants. It has become evident that a significant percentage of agricultural workers have clinical symptoms associated with long-term exposure to organic dusts and animal confinement gases. Respiratory diseases and syndromes, including hypersensitivity pneumonitis, organic dust toxic syndrome, chronic bronchitis, mucous membrane inflammation syndrome, and asthmalike syndrome, result from ongoing acute and chronic exposures. In this review we focus upon the emerging respiratory health issues in a changing agricultural economic and technologic environment. Environmental and occupational hazards and exposures will be emphasized rather than clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods of prevention, from both engineering controls and personal respiratory perspectives, are also addressed.

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):410-7
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Apr;39(4):308-14
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;158(2):662-5
    1. Eur Respir J. 1998 Sep;12(3):569-72
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 1):1493-8
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Nov;40(11):999-1006
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Dec;40(12):1048-52
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jan;35(1):51-7
    1. Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Feb;43(2):107-15
    1. Occup Med. 1999 Apr-Jun;14(2):247-84
    1. Occup Med. 1999 Apr-Jun;14(2):337-50
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Aug;23(4):271-80
    1. Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1452-8
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):233-8
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Mar;42(3):260-9
    1. Allergy. 1985 Jan;40(1):23-6
    1. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Jul;47(7):404-10
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Oct;138(4):921-7
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989 Mar;64(3):291-304
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Nov;84(5 Pt 2):839-44
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(3):241-61
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(4):421-5
    1. Chest. 1993 Mar;103(3):702-9
    1. J Dairy Sci. 1993 Mar;76(3):898-902
    1. Tuber Lung Dis. 1993 Apr;74(2):74-86
    1. J Occup Med. 1994 Jan;36(1):49-56
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun 1;139(11):1055-65
    1. Environ Res. 1994 Oct;67(1):98-107
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jan;151(1):47-53
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Jan;27(1):65-74
    1. J Infect Dis. 1995 Apr;171(4):864-70
    1. Brain Res Bull. 1995;37(4):369-75
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;152(2):603-8
    1. Chest. 1995 Nov;108(5):1425-33
    1. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Oct;52(10):654-60
    1. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1995 Oct;37(5):430-5
    1. Intern Med. 1995 Oct;34(10):966-71
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 May;153(5):1553-9
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jan;29(1):33-40
    1. J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(3):275-305
    1. J Anim Sci. 1998 May;76(5):1343-55

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe