Does the Effectiveness of a Medicine Copay Voucher Vary by Baseline Medication Out-Of-Pocket Expenses? Insights From ARTEMIS

Jennifer A Rymer, Lisa A Kaltenbach, Eric D Peterson, David J Cohen, Gregg C Fonarow, Niteesh K Choudhry, Timothy D Henry, Christopher P Cannon, Tracy Y Wang, Jennifer A Rymer, Lisa A Kaltenbach, Eric D Peterson, David J Cohen, Gregg C Fonarow, Niteesh K Choudhry, Timothy D Henry, Christopher P Cannon, Tracy Y Wang

Abstract

Background Persistence to P2Y12 inhibitors after myocardial infarction (MI) remains low. Out-of-pocket cost is cited as a factor affecting medication compliance. We examined whether a copayment intervention affected 1-year persistence to P2Y12 inhibitors and clinical outcomes. Methods and Results In an analysis of ARTEMIS (Affordability and Real-World Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study), patients with MI discharged on a P2Y12 inhibitor were stratified by baseline out-of-pocket medication burden: low ($0-$49 per month), intermediate ($50-$149 per month), and high (≥$150 per month). The impact of the voucher intervention on 1-year P2Y12 inhibitor persistence was examined using a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations. We assessed the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events among the groups using a Kaplan-Meier estimator. Among 7351 MI-treated patients at 282 hospitals, 54.2% patients were in the low copay group, 32.0% in the middle copay group, and 13.8% in the high copay group. Patients in higher copay groups were more likely to have a history of prior MI, heart failure, and diabetes compared with the low copay group (all P<0.0001). Voucher use was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of 1-year P2Y12 inhibitor persistence regardless of copayment tier (low copay with versus without voucher: adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.25-1.66]; middle copay: adjusted OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.37-1.95]; high copay group: adjusted OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.05-1.87]; P interaction=0.42). Patients in the high copay group without a voucher had similar risk of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients in the high copay group with a voucher (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]). Conclusions Medication copayment vouchers were associated with higher medication persistence at 1 year following an MI, regardless of out-of-pocket medication burden. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02406677.

Keywords: copay; myocardial infarction; persistence; voucher.

Figures

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes…
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes by study groups (copay status and intervention vs usual care).
(A) Cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after discharge for myocardial infarction (MI) by study groups (copay status and intervention vs usual care). (B) Cumulative incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3+ bleeding after discharge for MI by study groups (copay status and intervention vs usual care).

References

    1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, Granger CB, Lane RA, Mack MJ, Mauri L, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2016;134:e123‐155, doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000404.
    1. Mathews R, Peterson ED, Honeycutt E, Chin CT, Effron MB, Zettler M, Fonarow GC, Henry TD, Wang TY. Early medication nonadherence after acute myocardial infarction: Insights into actionable opportunities from the TReatment with ADP receptor iNhibitorS: longitudinal assessment of treatment patterns and events after acute coronary syndrome (TRANSLATE‐ACS) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:347–356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001223
    1. Mathews R, Wang TY, Honeycutt E, Henry TD, Zettler M, Chang M, Fonarow GC, Peterson ED. Persistence with secondary prevention medications after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the TRANSLATE‐ACS study. Am Heart J. 2015;170:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.019
    1. Doll JA, Hellkamp AS, Goyal A, Sutton NR, Peterson ED, Wang TY. Treatment, outcomes, and adherence to medication regimens among dual Medicare‐Medicaid‐eligible adults with myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:787–794. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2724
    1. Mehran R, Baber U, Steg PG, Ariti C, Weisz G, Witzenbichler B, Henry TD, Kini AS, Stuckey T, Cohen DJ, et al. Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2013;382:1714–1722. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61720-1
    1. Spertus JA, Kettelkamp R, Vance C, Decker C, Jones PG, Rumsfeld JS, Messenger JC, Khanal S, Peterson ED, Bach RG, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug‐eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry. Circulation. 2006;113:2803–2809. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618066
    1. Bosworth HB, Granger BB, Mendys P, Brindis R, Burkholder R, Czajkowski SM, Daniel JG, Ekman I, Ho M, Johnson M, et al. Medication adherence: a call for action. Am Heart J. 2011;162:412–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.007
    1. Choudhry NK, Avorn J, Glynn RJ, Antman EM, Schneeweiss S, Toscano M, Reisman L, Fernandes J, Spettell C, Lee JL, et al. Full coverage for preventive medications after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2088–2097. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1107913
    1. Trivedi AN, Moloo H, Mor V. Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:320–328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533
    1. Thornton Snider J, Seabury S, Lopez J, Mckenzie S, Goldman DP. Impact of type 2 diabetes medication cost sharing on patient outcomes and health plan costs. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22:433–440.
    1. Karaca‐Mandic P, Jena AB, Joyce GF, Goldman DP. Out‐of‐pocket medication costs and use of medications and health care services among children with asthma. JAMA. 2012;307:1284–1291. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.340
    1. Wang TY, Kaltenbach LA, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Choudhry NK, Henry TD, Cohen DJ, Bhandary D, Khan ND, Anstrom KJ, et al. Effect of medication co‐payment vouchers on P2Y12 inhibitor use and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with myocardial infarction: the ARTEMIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:44–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19791
    1. Jackevicius CA, Ko DT. Medication co‐payment vouchers, adherence with antiplatelet therapy, and adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2019;321:37–39. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20396

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe