Comparison of a novel algorithm quantitatively estimating epifascial fibrosis in three-dimensional computed tomography images to other clinical lymphedema grading methods

Kyo-In Koo, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Yongkwan Lee, Hye Won Son, Suwon Lee, Chang Ho Hwang, Kyo-In Koo, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Yongkwan Lee, Hye Won Son, Suwon Lee, Chang Ho Hwang

Abstract

No method has yet been approved for detecting lymphedema fibrosis before its progression. This study assessed the feasibility of computed tomography-based estimation of fibrosis. This observational, cross-sectional study included patients with lymphedema affecting one limb. Three types (maximum, mean, minimum) of computed tomography reticulation indexes were digitally calculated from trans-axial images using absorptive values, and the computed tomography reticulation indexes compared with clinical scales and measurements. Of 326 patients evaluated by at least one of lymphoscintigraphy, bio-electrical impedance, and computed tomography, 24 were evaluated by all three. The mean number of computed tomography scans in these patients was 109. Sixteen patients had breast cancer, seven had gynecologic cancers, and one had primary lymphedema. Mean computed tomography reticulation index (r = 0.52, p < 0.01) and maximal computed tomography reticulation index (r = 0.45, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with time from initial limb swelling to computed tomography. Mean computed tomography reticulation index (r = 0.86, p < 0.01), minimal computed tomography reticulation index (r = 0.79, p < 0.01), and maximal computed tomography reticulation index (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with International Society of Lymphedema substage. Minimal computed tomography reticulation index correlated with 1-kHz-based bio-electrical impedance ratio (r = -0.46, p < 0.05) and with standardized proximal limb circumference difference ratio (r = 0.45, p < 0.05) of both limbs. Maximal computed tomography reticulation index had a sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.60, and areas under the curve of 0.66 in detecting lymphoscintigraphic stage IV. The algorithm utilizing three-dimensional computed tomography images of epifascial fibrosis may be used as a marker for lymphedema duration, limb swelling, International Society of Lymphedema substage, and interstitial lymphatic fluids of lymphedema. The current approach shows promise in providing an additional method to assist in characterizing and monitoring lymphedema patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03523494.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. The images under the proposed…
Fig 1. The images under the proposed image processing procedures.
The original CT image of the affected limb (the first image; the farthest left one in the upper row), six intermediate images and the final image (farthest right in the lower row) are shown. The algorithm eliminated pixels from -50 Hounsfield unit (HU) to 26 HU (image 2), and removed any remained noise using a simple opening filter and manual reoperation (image 3). The outmost skin was removed based on its location (image 4). The remained pattern was processed as one connected region using the closing filter (image 5). Outside of this one connected region, the eliminated skin line was added as one outside thick line (image 6). This merged morphological pattern was converted by the black-white reversion operation. (image 7). The inversed pattern subtracted from the original CT image yielding a donut-shaped region between the skin and the muscle. (image 8). The nonblack pixels of the final image were regarded as epifascial lymph-proliferative fibrosis.
Fig 2. Correlation between the CT reticulation…
Fig 2. Correlation between the CT reticulation indexes and other clinical measurements.
(A) Maximal CT reticulation index (CTRIMAX) showed significant relationship with time from the onset of lymph edema to CT (LETOCT). (B) Minimal CT reticulation index (CTRIMIN) showed significant relationship with difference in the circumference ratio of an affected and nonaffected limb 5 cm proximal to the anatomical landmarks (cm) (CIRUP). (C) CTRIMIN showed significant relationship with 1 kHz-based bio-electrical impedance ratio (BEI) between an affected and nonaffected limb. (D) Mean CT reticulation index (CTRIMEAN) showed significant relationships with LETOCT. Spearman correlation analysis or Mann-Whitney U test.
Fig 3. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis…
Fig 3. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the effects of CT reticulation indexes on the epifascial and subfascial lymphatic system dysfunction.
Maximal value of CT reticulation index can distinguish (A) lymphoscintigraphic stages III and IV from stages I and II and (B) stage IV from stages I, II, and III. AUC. area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Spector ME, Gallagher KK, McHugh JB, Mukherji SK. Correlation of radiographic and pathologic findings of dermal lymphatic invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2012;33(3):462–4. Epub 2011/11/26. 10.3174/ajnr.A2822
    1. Wang J, Iranmanesh AM, Oates ME. Skeletal Scintigraphy in Radiation-Induced Fibrosis With Lymphedema. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2017;42(3):231–4. Epub 2016/12/30. 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001525 .
    1. Deura I, Shimada M, Hirashita K, Sugimura M, Sato S, Sato S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lower limb lymphedema after gynecologic cancer surgery with initiation of periodic complex decongestive physiotherapy. International journal of clinical oncology. 2015;20(3):556–60. Epub 2014/07/06. 10.1007/s10147-014-0724-0 .
    1. Yost KJ, Cheville AL, Al-Hilli MM, Mariani A, Barrette BA, McGree ME, et al. Lymphedema after surgery for endometrial cancer: prevalence, risk factors, and quality of life. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):307–15. Epub 2014/07/09. 10.1097/aog.0000000000000372
    1. O'Toole J, Jammallo LS, Miller CL, Skolny MN, Specht MC, Taghian AG. Screening for breast cancer-related lymphedema: the need for standardization. The oncologist. 2013;18(4):350–2. Epub 2013/04/12. 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0387
    1. Sisman H, Sahin B, Duman BB, Tanriverdi G. Nurse-assisted education and exercise decrease the prevalence and morbidity of lymphedema following breast cancer surgery. Journal of BUON: official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. 2012;17(3):565–9. Epub 2012/10/04. .
    1. Rasmusson E, Gunnlaugsson A, Blom R, Bjork-Eriksson T, Nilsson P, Ahlgen G, et al. Low rate of lymphedema after extended pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by pelvic irradiation of node-positive prostate cancer. Radiation oncology (London, England). 2013;8:271 Epub 2013/11/21. 10.1186/1748-717x-8-271
    1. Cormier JN, Xing Y, Zaniletti I, Askew RL, Stewart BR, Armer JM. Minimal limb volume change has a significant impact on breast cancer survivors. Lymphology. 2009;42(4):161–75. Epub 2010/03/12.
    1. Yoo JS, Chung SH, Lim MC. Computed tomography-based quantitative assessment of lower extremity lymphedema following treatment for gynecologic cancer. 2017;28(2):e18 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e18 .
    1. Rockson SG. The lymphatics and the inflammatory response: lessons learned from human lymphedema. Lymphatic research and biology. 2013;11(3):117–20. Epub 2013/09/13. 10.1089/lrb.2013.1132
    1. Alitalo K, Tammela T, Petrova TV. Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature. 2005;438(7070):946–53. Epub 2005/12/16. 10.1038/nature04480 .
    1. Gamba JL, Silverman PM, Ling D, Dunnick NR, Korobkin M. Primary lower extremity lymphedema: CT diagnosis. Radiology. 1983;149(1):218 Epub 1983/10/01. 10.1148/radiology.149.1.6611927 .
    1. Monnin-Delhom ED, Gallix BP, Achard C, Bruel JM, Janbon C. High resolution unenhanced computed tomography in patients with swollen legs. Lymphology. 2002;35(3):121–8. Epub 2002/10/05. .
    1. Vaughan BF. CT of swollen legs. Clinical radiology. 1990;41(1):24–30. Epub 1990/01/01. 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80927-4 .
    1. Monnin-Delhom E ME, Bruel IM. Predictive CT criteria of response to lymphatic draingage in lymphedema of the lower limbs. Lymphology. 1998;31 (suppl):330–4.
    1. Tenenbaum A, Brorson H, Johansson E, Perbeck L, Steen-Zupanc U. [Lower risk of fat formation and fibrosis if lymphedema is treated in time]. Lakartidningen. 2005;102(32–33):2220–5. Epub 2005/09/09. .
    1. Hounsfield GN. Computed medical imaging. Science (New York, NY). 1980;210(4465):22–8. Epub 1980/10/03. 10.1126/science.6997993 .
    1. Murdaca G, Cagnati P, Gulli R, Spano F, Puppo F, Campisi C, et al. Current views on diagnostic approach and treatment of lymphedema. The American journal of medicine. 2012;125(2):134–40. Epub 2012/01/25. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.032 .
    1. Pecking AP, Alberini JL, Wartski M, Edeline V, Cluzan RV. Relationship between lymphoscintigraphy and clinical findings in lower limb lymphedema (LO): toward a comprehensive staging. Lymphology. 2008;41(1):1–10. Epub 2008/06/28. .
    1. Suami H, Pan WR, Taylor GI. Changes in the lymph structure of the upper limb after axillary dissection: radiographic and anatomical study in a human cadaver. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007;120(4):982–91. Epub 2007/09/07. 10.1097/01.prs.0000277995.25009.3e .
    1. Szuba A, Shin WS, Strauss HW, Rockson S. The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema. Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2003;44(1):43–57. Epub 2003/01/08. .
    1. Sun D, Yu Z, Chen J, Wang L, Han L, Liu N. The Value of Using a SkinFibroMeter for Diagnosis and Assessment of Secondary Lymphedema and Associated Fibrosis of Lower Limb Skin. Lymphatic research and biology. 2017;15(1):70–6. Epub 2017/03/10. 10.1089/lrb.2016.0029 .
    1. Geyer MJ, Brienza DM, Chib V, Wang J. Quantifying fibrosis in venous disease: mechanical properties of lipodermatosclerotic and healthy tissue. Advances in skin & wound care. 2004;17(3):131–42. Epub 2004/06/15. 10.1097/00129334-200404000-00014 .
    1. Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, Yamashita O, Samura M, Hamano K. Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Annals of vascular diseases. 2013;6(2):180–8. Epub 2013/07/05. 10.3400/avd.oa.12.00102
    1. Kim SY, Bae H, Ji HM. Computed Tomography as an Objective Measurement Tool for Secondary Lymphedema Treated With Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy. Annals of rehabilitation medicine. 2015;39(3):488–93. Epub 2015/07/15. 10.5535/arm.2015.39.3.488
    1. Tashiro K, Feng J, Wu SH, Mashiko T, Kanayama K, Narushima M, et al. Pathological changes of adipose tissue in secondary lymphoedema. The British journal of dermatology. 2017;177(1):158–67. Epub 2016/12/22. 10.1111/bjd.15238 .
    1. Markhus CE, Karlsen TV, Wagner M, Svendsen OS, Tenstad O, Alitalo K, et al. Increased interstitial protein because of impaired lymph drainage does not induce fibrosis and inflammation in lymphedema. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2013;33(2):266–74. Epub 2013/01/05. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300384 .
    1. Edmunds K, Gislason M, Sigurethsson S, Guethnason V, Harris T, Carraro U, et al. Advanced quantitative methods in correlating sarcopenic muscle degeneration with lower extremity function biometrics and comorbidities. PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0193241 Epub 2018/03/08. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193241
    1. Balzarini A, Milella M, Civelli E, Sigari C, De Conno F. Ultrasonography of arm edema after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a preliminary study. Lymphology. 2001;34(4):152–5. Epub 2002/01/11. .
    1. van Zanten M, Piller N, Ward LC. Inter-Changeability of Impedance Devices for Lymphedema Assessment. Lymphatic research and biology. 2016;14(2):88–94. Epub 2015/11/18. 10.1089/lrb.2015.0026 .
    1. Gaw R, Box R, Cornish B. Bioimpedance in the assessment of unilateral lymphedema of a limb: the optimal frequency. Lymphatic research and biology. 2011;9(2):93–9. Epub 2011/06/22. 10.1089/lrb.2010.0020 .
    1. Haaverstad R, Nilsen G, Myhre HO, Saether OD, Rinck PA. The use of MRI in the investigation of leg oedema. European journal of vascular surgery. 1992;6(2):124–9. Epub 1992/03/01. 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80228-2 .
    1. Kim P, Lee JK. Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy to Predict the Possibility of Lymphedema Development After Breast Cancer Surgery: Retrospective Clinical Study. 2017;41(6):1065–75. 10.5535/arm.2017.41.6.1065 .
    1. Oliveira MMF, Gurgel MSC, Amorim BJ, Ramos CD, Derchain S, Furlan-Santos N, et al. Long term effects of manual lymphatic drainage and active exercises on physical morbidities, lymphoscintigraphy parameters and lymphedema formation in patients operated due to breast cancer: A clinical trial. PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0189176 Epub 2018/01/06. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189176
    1. Brautigam P, Foldi E, Schaiper I, Krause T, Vanscheidt W, Moser E. Analysis of lymphatic drainage in various forms of leg edema using two compartment lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphology. 1998;31(2):43–55. Epub 1998/07/17. .
    1. Pavlista D, Eliska O. [Lymphatic mapping in axilla as possible prevention of lymphedema in breast cancer patients—first results of the anatomical study]. Ceska gynekologie. 2012;77(3):251–4. Epub 2012/07/12. .
    1. Rockson SG. The unique biology of lymphatic edema. Lymphatic research and biology. 2009;7(2):97–100. Epub 2009/06/16. 10.1089/lrb.2009.7202 .
    1. Kosir MA, Rymal C, Koppolu P, Hryniuk L, Darga L, Du W, et al. Surgical outcomes after breast cancer surgery: measuring acute lymphedema. The Journal of surgical research. 2001;95(2):147–51. Epub 2001/02/13. 10.1006/jsre.2000.6021 .
    1. Ohzeki T, Hanaki K, Tsukuda T, Urashima H, Ohtahara H, Tanaka Y, et al. Fat areas on the extremities in normal weight and overweight children and adolescents: Comparison between age-related and weight-related changes in adiposity. American journal of human biology: the official journal of the Human Biology Council. 1996;8(4):427–31. Epub 1996/01/01. 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1996)8:4<427::aid-ajhb2>;2-v .
    1. Kim M, Suh DH, Yang EJ, Lim MC, Choi JY, Kim K, et al. Identifying risk factors for occult lower extremity lymphedema using computed tomography in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancers. Gynecologic oncology. 2017;144(1):153–8. Epub 2017/01/18. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.037 .
    1. Hattori K, Numata N, Ikoma M, Matsuzaka A, Danielson RR. Sex differences in the distribution of subcutaneous and internal fat. Human biology. 1991;63(1):53–63. Epub 1991/02/01. .
    1. Brorson H, Ohlin K, Olsson G, Karlsson MK. Breast cancer-related chronic arm lymphedema is associated with excess adipose and muscle tissue. Lymphatic research and biology. 2009;7(1):3–10. Epub 2009/02/24. 10.1089/lrb.2008.1022 .
    1. Scherr MK, Peschel O, Grimm JM, Ziegeler E, Uhl M, Geyer LL, et al. Low-dose CT in body-packers: delineation of body packs and radiation dose in a porcine model. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology. 2014;10(2):170–8. Epub 2014/01/21. 10.1007/s12024-013-9522-7 .
    1. Murphy KP, McLaughlin PD, Twomey M, Chan VE, Moloney F, Fung AJ, et al. Accurate tissue characterization in low-dose CT imaging with pure iterative reconstruction. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. 2017;61(2):190–6. Epub 2016/10/16. 10.1111/1754-9485.12546 .
    1. Savetsky IL, Torrisi JS, Cuzzone DA, Ghanta S, Albano NJ, Gardenier JC, et al. Obesity increases inflammation and impairs lymphatic function in a mouse model of lymphedema. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2014;307(2):H165–72. Epub 2014/05/27. 10.1152/ajpheart.00244.2014

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe