Diet Quality and Its Association with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Vary by Hispanic and Latino Ethnic Background in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Josiemer Mattei, Daniela Sotres-Alvarez, Martha L Daviglus, Linda C Gallo, Marc Gellman, Frank B Hu, Katherine L Tucker, Walter C Willett, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Linda Van Horn, Robert C Kaplan, Josiemer Mattei, Daniela Sotres-Alvarez, Martha L Daviglus, Linda C Gallo, Marc Gellman, Frank B Hu, Katherine L Tucker, Walter C Willett, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Linda Van Horn, Robert C Kaplan

Abstract

Background: Healthful diet quality has been associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in several populations, but reports on Hispanic and Latino cohorts, grouped or by ethnic background, have been limited and inconsistent.

Objective: We aimed to examine diet quality by using the 2010 Alternate Healthy Eating Index [(AHEI) range: 0-110, lowest to highest quality] and its cross-sectional association with MetS and its cardiometabolic components across 6 Hispanic and Latino backgrounds.

Methods: We studied 12,406 US Hispanics and Latinos, aged 18-74 y and free of diabetes, from the multicenter, population-based Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos cohort. Food and nutrients were assessed from two 24-h recalls. MetS was defined by using the 2009 harmonized guidelines. Complex survey procedures were used in multivariable-adjusted linear regression models to test the association of the AHEI with continuous markers and in logistic regression models with MetS as an outcome.

Results: The prevalence of MetS was 24.2%. Overall, Hispanics and Latinos had low scores for intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juices, whole grains, and fruit and favorable scores for trans fats and nuts and legumes, according to AHEI criteria. Adjusted mean AHEI and its individual components differed by ethnic background (P < 0.001), ranging from 43.0 for Puerto Ricans to 52.6 for Mexicans. Overall, adjusted odds (95% CIs) of having MetS were 22% (9%, 33%) lower for each 10-unit increase in AHEI. This association was modified by ethnic background (P-interaction = 0.03), with significantly lower odds observed only for Mexicans (30%; 95% CIs: 13%, 44%) and Central Americans (42%; 95% CIs: 9%, 64%) for each 10-unit increase in AHEI. AHEI was inversely associated with waist circumference, blood pressure, and glucose among Mexicans and Puerto Ricans and with triglycerides among Mexicans only, and positively associated with HDL cholesterol among Puerto Ricans and Central Americans (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Diet quality differed by Hispanic or Latino background. Although healthier diet quality was associated with lower odds of MetS in the overall Hispanic and Latino cohort, the association of AHEI and cardiometabolic factors varied by ethnic background. Nutrition-related research and interventions among ethnically diverse groups should consider individual ethnic backgrounds to optimally address diet quality and cardiometabolic health. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02060344.

Keywords: HCHS/SOL; Hispanics; Latinos; cardiometabolic risk factors; diet quality; health disparities; metabolic syndrome; minority health; race/ethnicity.

Conflict of interest statement

2 Author disclosures: J Mattei, D Sotres-Alvarez, ML Daviglus, LC Gallo, M Gellman, FB Hu, KL Tucker, WC Willett, AM Siega-Riz, L Van Horn, and RC Kaplan, no conflicts of interest.

© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Age-adjusted probability density distributions of AHEI by Hispanic or Latino background and center in HCHS/SOL individuals without diabetes. Values are age-adjusted probability densities of AHEI. Vertical lines represent tertile values of AHEI in the overall sample. (A) AHEI by Hispanic or Latino background (sample sizes per background: Mexican = 5067, Puerto Rican = 1944, Cuban = 1892, Dominican = 1175, Central American = 1402, and South American = 926). (B) AHEI by HCHS/SOL center (sample sizes per center: Bronx = 2928, Miami = 3226, Chicago = 3113, and San Diego = 3,139). (C) AHEI for Mexicans (dashed lines) and Puerto Ricans (solid lines) by HCHS/SOL center with ≥5% of those of that ethnic background living in that location (sample sizes per background by center: Puerto Ricans in Bronx = 1289, Puerto Ricans in Miami = 63, Puerto Ricans in Chicago = 567, Mexicans in Bronx = 175, Mexicans in Chicago = 1836, and Mexicans in San Diego = 3021). AHEI, Alternate Healthy Eating Index; HCHS/SOL, Hispanic Community Health Study/Study on Latinos.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean AHEI and its components by Hispanic and Latino background in HCHS/SOL individuals without diabetes. Values are means ± SEs for the score of the overall AHEI and its individual components, adjusted for age, sex, household income, marital status, educational attainment, years living in the United States, physical activity, smoking status, and center. In addition, nutrient and food group scores and intakes were adjusted for energy intake. The AHEI score has a possible range of 0–110 points; each individual score ranges from 0 to 10 points. The AHEI differed significantly by Hispanic or Latino background (P < 0.001). Sample sizes per background: all = 12,406, Mexicans = 5067, Puerto Ricans = 1944, Cubans = 1892, Dominicans = 1175, Central Americans = 1402, and South Americans = 926. AHEI, Alternate Healthy Eating Index; HCHS/SOL, Hispanic Community Health Study/Study on Latinos; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe