Indoor environmental quality and learning outcomes: protocol on large-scale sensor deployment in schools

Juan Palacios Temprano, Piet Eichholtz, Maartje Willeboordse, Nils Kok, Juan Palacios Temprano, Piet Eichholtz, Maartje Willeboordse, Nils Kok

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure to poor environmental conditions has been associated with deterioration of physical and mental health, and with reduction of cognitive performance. Environmental conditions may also influence cognitive development of children, but epidemiological evidence is scant. In developed countries, children spend 930 hours per year in a classroom, second only to time spent in their bedroom. Using continuous sensing technology, we investigate the relationship between indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and cognitive performance of school-aged children. The proposed study will result in a better understanding of the effects of environmental characteristics on cognitive performance, thereby paving the way for experimental studies.

Methods and analysis: A study protocol is presented to reliably measure IEQ in schools. We will monitor the IEQ of 280 classrooms for 5 years, covering approximately 10 000 children. Each classroom in the sample is permanently equipped with a sensor measuring air quality (carbon dioxide and coarse particles), temperature, relative humidity, light intensity and noise levels, all at 1 min intervals. The location of sensing equipment within and across rooms has been validated by a pilot study. Academic performance of school-aged children is measured through standardised cognitive tests. In addition, a series of health indicators is collected (eg, school absence and demand for healthcare), together with an extensive set of sociodemographic characteristics (eg, parental income, education, occupational status).

Ethics and dissemination: Medical Ethical Approval for the current study was waived by the Medical Ethical Committee azM/UM (METC 2018-0681). In addition, data on student performance and health stems from an already existing data infrastructure that are granted with ethical approval by the Ethical Review Committee Inner City faculties (ERCIC_092_12_07_2018). Health data are obtained from the 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future' (HPSF) project. Medical Ethical Approval for HPSF was waived by the Medical Ethical Committee of Zuyderland, Heerlen (METC 14 N-142). The HPSF study protocol was registered in the database ClinicalTrials.gov on 14-06-2016 with reference number NCT02800616, this study is currently in the Results stage. Data collection from Gemeentelijke Gezondheidsdienst Zuid-Limburg (GGD-ZL) is executed by researchers of HPSF, this procedure has been fully approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Zuyderland. The questionnaires on level of comfort will be filled in anonymously by students and teachers. The study will follow the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) and Dutch data protection law to ensure protection of personal data, as well as maintain proper data management and anonymisation.The protocol discussed in this paper includes significant efforts focused on integrating results and making them available to both the scientific community and the wider public, including policy makers. The results will lead to multiple scientific articles that will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, as well as through conference presentations. In addition, we will exploit ongoing collaboration with project stakeholders and project partners to disseminate information to the target audience. For example, the results will be presented to school boards in the Netherlands, through engagement with the Coalition for Green Schools, as well as to school boards in USA, through engagement with the Center for Green Schools.

Trial registration number: NCT02800616; Results.

Keywords: epidemiology; public health; statistics & research methods.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Current studies on indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and cognitive performance of children. The references of the studies included in the graphs are included in the appendix. The blue dot represents the study design presented in this paper.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation in carbon dioxide (CO2), coarse particles and temperature within and across classrooms. The figure presents the Pearson correlation matrixes of the peaks of CO2, the daily average of coarse particles (PN), and temperature, measured at different locations within four classrooms: two classrooms in a relatively new school (‘school 1’) and two classrooms in an older school (‘school 2’).

References

    1. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST. Air pollution and health. Lancet 2002;360:1233–42. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8
    1. OECD Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.
    1. U.S. Department of Education Condition of America ’ s Public School Facilities : 2012-13. Washington, DC: Natl Cent Educ Stat, 2014.
    1. Liu C, Chen R, Sera F, et al. . Ambient particulate air pollution and daily mortality in 652 cities. N Engl J Med 2019;381:705–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1817364
    1. Basu R, Samet JM. Relation between elevated ambient temperature and mortality: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev 2002;24:190–202. 10.1093/epirev/mxf007
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Calderón-Garcidueñas A, Torres-Jardón R, et al. . Air pollution and your brain: what do you need to know right now. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2015;16:329–45. 10.1017/S146342361400036X
    1. Taylor L, Watkins SL, Marshall H, et al. . The impact of different environmental conditions on cognitive function: a focused review. Front Physiol 2015;6:372 10.3389/fphys.2015.00372
    1. Makri A, Goveia M, Balbus J, et al. . Children's susceptibility to chemicals: a review by developmental stage. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2004;7:417–35. 10.1080/10937400490512465
    1. Currie J. Pollution and infant health. Child Dev Perspect 2013;7:237–42. 10.1111/cdep.12047
    1. Graff Zivin J, Shrader J, Extremes T. Health, and human capital. Futur Child 2016;26:31–50.
    1. Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Esnaola M, et al. . Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:7937–42. 10.1073/pnas.1503402112
    1. Sunyer J, Esnaola M, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, et al. . Association between traffic-related air pollution in schools and cognitive development in primary school children: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001792–24. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001792
    1. Ebenstein A, Lavy V, Roth S. The Long-Run economic consequences of High-Stakes examinations: evidence from transitory variation in pollution. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2016;8:36–65. 10.1257/app.20150213
    1. Spengler JD, Chen Q. Indoor air quality factors in designing a healthy building. Annu Rev Energy Environ;25:567–601.
    1. Stankovic A, Alexander D, Oman CM, et al. . A review of cognitive and behavioral effects of increased carbon dioxide exposure in humans. NASA/TM-2016-219277, 2016: 1–24.
    1. Seppänen OA, Fisk WJ. Summary of human responses to ventilation. Indoor Air 2004;14 Suppl 7:102–18. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00279.x
    1. Sundell J, Levin H, Nazaroff WW, et al. . Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. Indoor Air 2011;21:191–204. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00703.x
    1. Annesi-Maesano I, Baiz N, Banerjee S, et al. . Indoor air quality and sources in schools and related health effects. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2013;16:491–550. 10.1080/10937404.2013.853609
    1. Shendell DG, Prill R, Fisk WJ, et al. . Associations between classroom CO2 concentrations and student attendance in Washington and Idaho. Indoor Air 2004;14:333–41. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00251.x
    1. Mendell MJ, Eliseeva EA, Davies MM, et al. . Association of classroom ventilation with reduced illness absence: a prospective study in California elementary schools. Indoor Air 2013;23:515–28. 10.1111/ina.12042
    1. Xu F, Uh J, Brier MR, et al. . The influence of carbon dioxide on brain activity and metabolism in conscious humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:58–67. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.153
    1. Zhang X, Wargocki P, Lian Z, et al. . Effects of exposure to carbon dioxide and bioeffluents on perceived air quality, self-assessed acute health symptoms, and cognitive performance. Indoor Air 2017;27:47–64. 10.1111/ina.12284
    1. Satish U, Mendell MJ, Shekhar K, et al. . Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environ Health Perspect 2012;120:1671–7. 10.1289/ehp.1104789
    1. Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Satish U, et al. . Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:805–12. 10.1289/ehp.1510037
    1. Patz JA, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, et al. . Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 2005;438:310–7. 10.1038/nature04188
    1. Hancock PA, Ross JM, Szalma JL. A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Hum Factors 2007;49:851–77. 10.1518/001872007X230226
    1. Park J. Hot temperature and high stakes cognitive assessments, 2018.
    1. Cho H. The effects of summer heat on academic achievement: a cohort analysis. J Environ Econ Manage 2017;83:185–96. 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.005
    1. Cian C, Barraud PA, Melin B, et al. . Effects of fluid ingestion on cognitive function after heat stress or exercise-induced dehydration. Int J Psychophysiol 2001;42:243–51. 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00142-8
    1. Gaoua N, Grantham J, El Massioui F, et al. . Cognitive decrements do not follow neuromuscular alterations during passive heat exposure. Int J Hyperthermia 2011;27:10–19. 10.3109/02656736.2010.519371
    1. Liu K, Sun G, Li B, et al. . The impact of passive hyperthermia on human attention networks: an fMRI study. Behav Brain Res 2013;243:220–30. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.013
    1. Barreca AI. Climate change, humidity, and mortality in the United States. J Environ Econ Manage 2012;63:19–34. 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.07.004
    1. Breitner S, Wolf K, Devlin RB, et al. . Short-Term effects of air temperature on mortality and effect modification by air pollution in three cities of Bavaria, Germany: a time-series analysis. Sci Total Environ 2014;485-486:49–61. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.048
    1. Fisk WJ. The ventilation problem in schools: literature review. Indoor Air 2017;27:1039–51. 10.1111/ina.12403
    1. Gaihre S, Semple S, Miller J, et al. . Classroom carbon dioxide concentration, school attendance, and educational attainment. J Sch Health 2014;84:569–74. 10.1111/josh.12183
    1. Mendell MJ, Eliseeva EA, Davies MM, et al. . Do classroom ventilation rates in California elementary schools influence standardized test scores? results from a prospective study. Indoor Air 2016;26:546–57. 10.1111/ina.12241
    1. Nusche D, Santiago P, Gilmore A, et al. . OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education - Netherlands 2014. OECD Publishing, 2014.
    1. CBS Inkomen van huishoudens; huishoudenskenmerken, regio (indeling 2019) [Internet]. Available: [Accessed cited 2019 Nov 22].
    1. CBS Arbeidsdeelname; regionale indeling 2018 [Internet]. Available: [Accessed cited 2019 Nov 22].
    1. WHO Methods for monitoring indoor air quality in schools methods for monitoring indoor air quality in schools, 2011.
    1. Madureira J, Paciência I, Pereira C, et al. . Indoor air quality in Portuguese schools: levels and sources of pollutants. Indoor Air 2016;26:526–37. 10.1111/ina.12237
    1. Wargocki P, Wyon D. The effects of moderately raised classroom temperatures and classroom ventilation rate on the performance of Schoolwork by children. 13 HVAC&R Research, 2007: 193–220.
    1. Tryner J, L'Orange C, Mehaffy J, et al. . Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers. Atmos Environ 2020;220:117067 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
    1. Ardon-dryer K, Dryer Y, Williams JN, et al. . Measurements of PM 2. 5 with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions. Athmospheric Meas tech Discusssions. 5, 2019.
    1. EDUCATIEVE AGENDA LIMBURG The OnderwijsMonitor Limburg [Internet]. Available: [Accessed cited 2019 Apr 2].
    1. Borghans L, Golsteyn BHH, Zölitz U. Parental preferences for primary school characteristics. B E J Econom Anal Policy 2015;15:85–117. 10.1515/bejeap-2014-0032
    1. Borghans L, Golsteyn BHH, Zölitz U. School quality and the development of cognitive skills between age four and six. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129700–20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129700
    1. Willeboordse M, Jansen MW, van den Heijkant SN, et al. . The healthy primary school of the future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health 2016;16:639 10.1186/s12889-016-3301-9
    1. Currie J. Healthy, wealthy, and wise: socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development. J Econ Lit 2009;47:87–122. 10.1257/jel.47.1.87
    1. Goodman J, Hurwitz M, Park J, et al. . Heat and learning. NBER working paper, 2018.
    1. Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang X. The impact of exposure to air pollution on cognitive performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:9193–7. 10.1073/pnas.1809474115

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe