A model identifying characteristics predictive of successful pelvic floor muscle training outcomes among women with stress urinary incontinence

Kaylee C L Brooks, Kevin Varette, Marie-Andrée Harvey, Magali Robert, Robert J Brison, Andrew Day, Kevin Baker, Vincent Della Zazzera, Eric Sauerbrei, Linda McLean, Kaylee C L Brooks, Kevin Varette, Marie-Andrée Harvey, Magali Robert, Robert J Brison, Andrew Day, Kevin Baker, Vincent Della Zazzera, Eric Sauerbrei, Linda McLean

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to prospectively identify aspects of baseline demographic, clinical, and pelvic morphology of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that are predictive of cure with physiotherapist-supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).

Methods: Women ≥18 years old with SUI were recruited from urogynecology and pelvic health physiotherapy clinics. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), a standardized pad test, manual assessment of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and tone, and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) assessment of their urogenital structures at rest while in a supine position and standing, and during contraction, straining, and coughing. Participants attended six physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks and performed a home PFMT program. The assessment was repeated after the intervention; cure was defined as a dry (≤2 g) pad test.

Results: Seventy-seven women aged 50 (±10) years completed the protocol; 38 (49%) were deemed cured. Based on univariate testing, four predictors were entered into a binary logistic regression model: ICIQ-UI-SF, PFM tone, bladder neck (BN) height in a quiet standing position, and BN height during a cough in a standing position. The model was significant (p < 0.001), accurately classifying outcome in 74% of participants. The model, validated through bootstrapping, performed moderately, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.90; p = 0.00), and with 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity.

Conclusions: Women with better bladder support in a standing position and less severe symptoms were most likely to be cured with PFMT.

Clinical trial registration: #NCT01602107.

Keywords: Pelvic floor muscle training; Pelvic floor muscles; Physiotherapy; Predictive model; Stress urinary incontinence; Transperineal ultrasound.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram. PT physiotherapy, RCT randomized controlled trial)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiving operator characteristic of separate predictors for the predictive model

References

    1. Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu C-W, et al. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011;186:589–593. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.114.
    1. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
    1. The Canadian Continence Foundation. The Impact of Incontinence in Canada A Briefing Document for Policy-Makers. 2014.
    1. Perera J, Kirthinanda DS, Wijeratne S, Wickramarachchi TK. Descriptive cross sectional study on prevalence, perceptions, predisposing factors and health seeking behaviour of women with stress urinary incontinence. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-78.
    1. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;(5):CD005654. 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4.
    1. Bettez M, Tu LM, Carlson K, Corcos J. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadian. Urol Assoc. 2012;6:354–363. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12248.
    1. Burgio KL, Goode PS, Locher JL, et al. Predictors of outcome in the behavioral treatment of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:940–947. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200311000-00011.
    1. Obloza A, Teo R, Marriott E, et al. Association of baseline severity of lower urinary tract symptoms with the success conservative therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:705–710. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3778-0.
    1. Cammu H, Van Nylen M, Blockeel C, et al. Who will benefit from pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1152–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.012.
    1. Truijen G, Wyndaele JJ, Weyler J. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: who will benefit? Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:386–390. doi: 10.1007/s001920170018.
    1. Dumoulin C, Bourbonnais D, Morin M, et al. Predictors of success for physiotherapy treatment in women with persistent postpartum stress urinary incontinence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1059–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.006.
    1. Dumoulin C, Tang A, Pontbriand-Drolet S, et al. Pelvic floor morphometry: a predictor of success of pelvic floor muscle training for women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1233–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3254-7.
    1. Krhut J, Martan A, Rosier P, et al. ICS Teaching Module: Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. In: ICS Teaching Modules. 2016.
    1. Laycock J, Jerwood D. Pelvic floor muscle assessment: the PERFECT scheme. Physiotherapy. 2001;87:631–642. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61108-X.
    1. Reissing ED, Brown C, Lord MJ, et al. Pelvic floor muscle functioning in women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:107–113. doi: 10.1080/01443610400023106.
    1. Previnaire JG. The importance of the bulbocavernosus reflex. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4:2. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0012-0.
    1. Enhorning G. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intra-urethral pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1961;276(Suppl):1–68.
    1. Peng Q, Jones R, Constantinou CE. 2D ultrasound image processing in identifying responses of urogenital structures to pelvic floor muscle activity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:477–493. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9059-3.
    1. Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey J. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:266–296. doi: 10.1196/annals.1389.034.
    1. DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:313–316. doi: 10.1007/1-84628-238-1_3.
    1. McLean L, Varette K, Gentilcore-Saulnier E, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence causes hypertrophy of the urethral sphincters and reduces bladder neck mobility during coughing. Neurol Urodyn. 2013;32:1096–1102. doi: 10.1002/nau.22343.
    1. Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:580–585. doi: 10.1002/uog.1899.
    1. Majida M, Brækken IH, Umek W, et al. Interobserver repeatability of three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:567–573. doi: 10.1002/uog.6351.
    1. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. I. Two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92. doi: 10.1002/uog.939.
    1. Dietz HP, Abbu A, Shek KL. The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:941–945. doi: 10.1002/uog.6268.
    1. Cammu H, Van Nylen M, Amy JJ. A 10-year follow-up after Kegel pelvic floor muscle exercises for genuine stress incontinence. BJU Int. 2001;85:655–658. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00506.x.
    1. Madill SJ, McLean L. A contextual model of pelvic floor muscle defects in female stress urinary incontinence: a rationale for physiotherapy treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:335–360. doi: 10.1196/annals.1389.035.
    1. Ferreira CHJ, Barbosa PB, Souza F de O, et al. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford grading scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.06.007.
    1. Cyr M-P, Kruger J, Wong V, et al. Pelvic floor morphometry and function in women with and without puborectalis avulsion in the early postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:274.e1–274.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1049.
    1. Dietz HP, Kirby A, Shek KL, Bedwell PJ. Does avulsion of the puborectalis muscle affect bladder function? Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:967–972. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0882-1.
    1. Dietz H, Simpson J. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2008;115:979–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01751.x.
    1. Huang W-C, Yang J-M. Bladder neck funneling on ultrasound cystourethrography in primary stress urinary incontinence: a sign associated with urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urology. 2003;61:936–941. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02558-X.
    1. Bø K, Hilde G. Does it work in the long term?—A systematic review on pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:215–223. doi: 10.1002/nau.22292.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe