The biological effect of large single doses: a possible role for non-targeted effects in cell inactivation

Marlon R Veldwijk, Bo Zhang, Frederik Wenz, Carsten Herskind, Marlon R Veldwijk, Bo Zhang, Frederik Wenz, Carsten Herskind

Abstract

Background and purpose: Novel radiotherapy techniques increasingly use very large dose fractions. It has been argued that the biological effect of large dose fractions may differ from that of conventional fraction sizes. The purpose was to study the biological effect of large single doses.

Material and methods: Clonogenic cell survival of MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was determined after direct X-ray irradiation, irradiation of feeder cells, or transfer of conditioned medium (CM). Cell-cycle distributions and the apoptotic sub-G1 fraction were measured by flow cytometry. Cytokines in CM were quantified by a cytokine antibody array. γH2AX foci were detected by immunofluorescence microscopy.

Results: The surviving fraction of MCF7 cells irradiated in vitro with 12 Gy showed an 8.5-fold decrease (95% c.i.: 4.4-16.3; P<0.0001) when the density of irradiated cells was increased from 10 to 50×10(3) cells per flask. Part of this effect was due to a dose-dependent transferrable factor as shown in CM experiments in the dose range 5-15 Gy. While no effect on apoptosis and cell cycle distribution was observed, and no differentially expressed cytokine could be identified, the transferable factor induced prolonged expression of γH2AX DNA repair foci at 1-12 h.

Conclusions: A dose-dependent non-targeted effect on clonogenic cell survival was found in the dose range 5-15 Gy. The dependence of SF on cell numbers at high doses would represent a "cohort effect" in vivo. These results support the hypothesis that non-targeted effects may contribute to the efficacy of very large dose fractions in radiotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Dr. Zhang was supported by a fellowship from Shanghai Mai-Ge Medical Technology Co. (Shanghai, China). There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors′ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1. Effect of cell density on…
Figure 1. Effect of cell density on cell survival after high-dose irradiation.
(a) Influence of the number of seeded cells on the shape of the survival curve of MCF7 cells in the colony formation assay. A significant decrease (P3/T25 flask) confirmed a significant inverse correlation (P<0.0001) with cell numbers (n = 5). (c) Feeder cell experiment to test the effect of high-dose (20 Gy) irradiated cell numbers on colony formation of unirradiated cells (MCF7). The experimental design is shown above the data diagram. A significant inverse correlation (P<0.0001) between the number of irradiated feeder cells per T25 flask and the normalized plating efficiency of unirradiated MCF7 cells was observed (n = 3). Mean±standard errors are shown.
Figure 2. Medium transfer experiments to test…
Figure 2. Medium transfer experiments to test effect of transferrable factor.
The experimental design is show above the diagrams. The effect of incubation with conditioned medium (CM) from irradiated cells on the clonogenic growth of unirradiated recipient cells for MCF7 (a) and MDA-MB-231(b). A dose-dependent decrease was found for MCF7 (P = 0.0001) and MDA-MB-231 (P

Figure 3. No influence of irradiation of…

Figure 3. No influence of irradiation of recipient cell on the effect of conditioned medium…

Figure 3. No influence of irradiation of recipient cell on the effect of conditioned medium (CM).
Inhibition of colony formation by 15 Gy irradiation CM was similar on unirradiated (a) and 4 Gy irradiated (b) recipient MCF7 cells. The different CM production conditions are shown on the abcissa. The different media showed essentially the same effect on unirradiated and irradiated recipients and were in line with previous experiments (with the exception of the 15 Gy IM (irradiated medium); see text for explanation). In addition, the volume of CM during production does not seem to alter the magnitude of the BE. Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown.

Figure 4. No effect of conditioned medium…

Figure 4. No effect of conditioned medium (CM) on cell cycle distribution and apoptosis.

Flow…

Figure 4. No effect of conditioned medium (CM) on cell cycle distribution and apoptosis.
Flow cytometry was performed at different time points after incubation of recipient MCF7 (a) or MDA-MB-231 (b) cells with 15 Gy CM. No effect on the cell cycle distribution or apoptosis rate (sub-G1) was observed at any time point 6–48 h. Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown.

Figure 5. Role of cytokines in intercellular…

Figure 5. Role of cytokines in intercellular signalling.

(a) 3–10 ng/ml TGF-β1 had no effect…

Figure 5. Role of cytokines in intercellular signalling.
(a) 3–10 ng/ml TGF-β1 had no effect on proliferation of MCF7 in mass culture (3 days incubation of proliferation test with vital dye alamarBlue). Inhibition of Mv1Lu cells confirmed the activity of TGF-β1. (b) No effect of 3–10 ng/ml TGF-β1 on colony formation of MCF7 cells. (c) Detection of cytokines expressed in CM from 15 Gy irradiated and unirradiated MCF7 cultures. No significant difference was observed (P = 0.46–0.95). The presence of the CM-mediated inhibitory effect on colony formation was verified in each experiment (not shown). Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown. None of the complete set of 36 cytokines tested showed a significant difference (P = 0.18–0.96). See Figure S1.

Figure 6. Conditioned medium (CM) induces prolonged…

Figure 6. Conditioned medium (CM) induces prolonged γ-H2AX foci in MCF7 cells.

Recipient cells were…

Figure 6. Conditioned medium (CM) induces prolonged γ-H2AX foci in MCF7 cells.
Recipient cells were incubated with conditioned medium (CM) from 15 Gy or sham irradiated MCF7 cells, or with 15 Gy irradiated or sham irradiated medium (IM). Treatment with 15 Gy irradiated CM produced rapid induction of γH2AX foci which stayed elevated up to 6–12 h. The mean number of foci per cell receiving CM from 15 Gy irradiated cells was significantly higher than in cells receiving unirradiated CM, 15 Gy irradiated or unirradiated non-conditioned medium (IM; P
Similar articles
References
    1. Hof H, Muenter M, Oetzel D, Hoess A, Debus J, et al. (2007) Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer 110: 148–155. - PubMed
    1. Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2012) Radiosurgery for brain metastases. Prog Neurol Surg 25: 115–122. - PubMed
    1. Timmerman RD, Kavanagh BD, Cho LC, Papiez L, Xing L (2007) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in multiple organ sites. J Clin Oncol 25: 947–952. - PubMed
    1. Morton G, Loblaw A, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Chahal M, et al. (2011) Is single fraction 15 Gy the preferred high dose-rate brachytherapy boost dose for prostate cancer? Radiother Oncol 100: 463–467. - PubMed
    1. Vaidya JS, Joseph DJ, Tobias JS, Bulsara M, Wenz F, et al. (2010) Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet 376: 91–102. - PubMed
Show all 38 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
Grant support
BZ was supported by a fellowship from Shanghai Mai-Ge Medical Technology Co. (www.luluyang.ezhaobiao.com; Yanan Rd,700 room 1102, 200001, Shanghai, China). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3. No influence of irradiation of…
Figure 3. No influence of irradiation of recipient cell on the effect of conditioned medium (CM).
Inhibition of colony formation by 15 Gy irradiation CM was similar on unirradiated (a) and 4 Gy irradiated (b) recipient MCF7 cells. The different CM production conditions are shown on the abcissa. The different media showed essentially the same effect on unirradiated and irradiated recipients and were in line with previous experiments (with the exception of the 15 Gy IM (irradiated medium); see text for explanation). In addition, the volume of CM during production does not seem to alter the magnitude of the BE. Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown.
Figure 4. No effect of conditioned medium…
Figure 4. No effect of conditioned medium (CM) on cell cycle distribution and apoptosis.
Flow cytometry was performed at different time points after incubation of recipient MCF7 (a) or MDA-MB-231 (b) cells with 15 Gy CM. No effect on the cell cycle distribution or apoptosis rate (sub-G1) was observed at any time point 6–48 h. Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown.
Figure 5. Role of cytokines in intercellular…
Figure 5. Role of cytokines in intercellular signalling.
(a) 3–10 ng/ml TGF-β1 had no effect on proliferation of MCF7 in mass culture (3 days incubation of proliferation test with vital dye alamarBlue). Inhibition of Mv1Lu cells confirmed the activity of TGF-β1. (b) No effect of 3–10 ng/ml TGF-β1 on colony formation of MCF7 cells. (c) Detection of cytokines expressed in CM from 15 Gy irradiated and unirradiated MCF7 cultures. No significant difference was observed (P = 0.46–0.95). The presence of the CM-mediated inhibitory effect on colony formation was verified in each experiment (not shown). Mean±standard errors (n = 3) are shown. None of the complete set of 36 cytokines tested showed a significant difference (P = 0.18–0.96). See Figure S1.
Figure 6. Conditioned medium (CM) induces prolonged…
Figure 6. Conditioned medium (CM) induces prolonged γ-H2AX foci in MCF7 cells.
Recipient cells were incubated with conditioned medium (CM) from 15 Gy or sham irradiated MCF7 cells, or with 15 Gy irradiated or sham irradiated medium (IM). Treatment with 15 Gy irradiated CM produced rapid induction of γH2AX foci which stayed elevated up to 6–12 h. The mean number of foci per cell receiving CM from 15 Gy irradiated cells was significantly higher than in cells receiving unirradiated CM, 15 Gy irradiated or unirradiated non-conditioned medium (IM; P

References

    1. Hof H, Muenter M, Oetzel D, Hoess A, Debus J, et al. (2007) Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer 110: 148–155.
    1. Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2012) Radiosurgery for brain metastases. Prog Neurol Surg 25: 115–122.
    1. Timmerman RD, Kavanagh BD, Cho LC, Papiez L, Xing L (2007) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in multiple organ sites. J Clin Oncol 25: 947–952.
    1. Morton G, Loblaw A, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Chahal M, et al. (2011) Is single fraction 15 Gy the preferred high dose-rate brachytherapy boost dose for prostate cancer? Radiother Oncol 100: 463–467.
    1. Vaidya JS, Joseph DJ, Tobias JS, Bulsara M, Wenz F, et al. (2010) Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet 376: 91–102.
    1. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A, Galimberti V, Zurrida S, et al. (2010) Intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery: a study on 1,822 cases treated with electrons. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124: 141–151.
    1. Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2003) Radiobiological analysis of tissue responses following radiosurgery. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2: 87–92.
    1. Kirkpatrick JP, Meyer JJ, Marks LB (2008) The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 18: 240–243.
    1. Herskind C, Wenz F (2009) Is there more to intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) than physical dose ? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 74: 976–977.
    1. Garcia LM, Wilkins DE, Raaphorst GP (2007) Alpha/beta ratio: A dose range dependence study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67: 587–593.
    1. Brenner DJ (2008) The linear-quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction. Semin Radiat Oncol 18: 234–239.
    1. Buonanno M, de Toledo SM, Azzam EI (2011) Increased frequency of spontaneous neoplastic transformation in progeny of bystander cells from cultures exposed to densely ionizing radiation. PLoS One 6: e21540.
    1. Hei TK, Zhou H, Ivanov VN, Hong M, Lieberman HB, et al. (2008) Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: a unifying model. J Pharm Pharmacol 60: 943–950.
    1. McMahon SJ, Butterworth KT, Trainor C, McGarry CK, O'Sullivan JM, et al. (2013) A kinetic-based model of radiation-induced intercellular signalling. PLoS One 8: e54526.
    1. Mothersill C, Seymour C (2012) Are epigenetic mechanisms involved in radiation-induced bystander effects? Front Genet 3: 74.
    1. Trainor C, Butterworth KT, McGarry CK, McMahon SJ, O'Sullivan JM, et al. (2012) DNA damage responses following exposure to modulated radiation fields. PLoS One 7: e43326.
    1. Blyth BJ, Sykes PJ (2011) Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures? Radiat Res 176: 139–157.
    1. Gerashchenko BI, Howell RW (2003) Flow cytometry as a strategy to study radiation-induced bystander effects in co-culture systems. Cytometry A 54: 1–7.
    1. Gomez-Millan J, Katz IS, Farias Vde A, Linares-Fernandez JL, Lopez-Penalver J, et al. (2012) The importance of bystander effects in radiation therapy in melanoma skin-cancer cells and umbilical-cord stromal stem cells. Radiother Oncol 102: 450–458.
    1. Liu Z, Mothersill CE, McNeill FE, Lyng FM, Byun SH, et al. (2006) A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell line. Radiat Res 166: 19–23.
    1. Tomita M, Maeda M, Maezawa H, Usami N, Kobayashi K (2010) Bystander cell killing in normal human fibroblasts is induced by synchrotron X-ray microbeams. Radiat Res 173: 380–385.
    1. Yang H, Asaad N, Held KD (2005) Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray-irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene 24: 2096–2103.
    1. Liu Q, Schneider F, Ma L, Wenz F, Herskind C (2013) Relative Biologic Effectiveness (RBE) of 50 kV X-rays Measured in a Phantom for Intraoperative Tumor-Bed Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85: 1127–1133.
    1. Maier P, Fleckenstein K, Li L, Laufs S, Zeller WJ, et al. (2006) Overexpression of MDR1 using a retroviral vector differentially regulates genes involved in detoxification and apoptosis and confers radioprotection. Radiat Res 166: 463–473.
    1. Gow MD, Seymour CB, Ryan LA, Mothersill CE (2010) Induction of bystander response in human glioma cells using high-energy electrons: a role for TGF-beta1. Radiat Res 173: 769–778.
    1. Iyer R, Lehnert BE, Svensson R (2000) Factors underlying the cell growth-related bystander responses to alpha particles. Cancer Res 60: 1290–1298.
    1. Facoetti A, Mariotti L, Ballarini F, Bertolotti A, Nano R, et al. (2009) Experimental and theoretical analysis of cytokine release for the study of radiation-induced bystander effect. Int J Radiat Biol 85: 690–699.
    1. Mariotti LG, Bertolotti A, Ranza E, Babini G, Ottolenghi A (2012) Investigation of the mechanisms underpinning IL-6 cytokine release in bystander responses: The roles of radiation dose, radiation quality and specific ROS/RNS scavengers. Int J Radiat Biol 88: 751–762.
    1. Nagasawa H, Huo L, Little JB (2003) Increased bystander mutagenic effect in DNA double-strand break repair-deficient mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol 79: 35–41.
    1. Truman JP, Garcia-Barros M, Kaag M, Hambardzumyan D, Stancevic B, et al. (2010) Endothelial membrane remodeling is obligate for anti-angiogenic radiosensitization during tumor radiosurgery. PLoS One 5: e12310.
    1. Pomp J, Wike JL, Ouwerkerk IJ, Hoogstraten C, Davelaar J, et al. (1996) Cell density dependent plating efficiency affects outcome and interpretation of colony forming assays. Radiother Oncol 40: 121–125.
    1. Mothersill C, Seymour C (2001) Radiation-induced bystander effects: past history and future directions. Radiat Res 155: 759–767.
    1. Shareef MM, Cui N, Burikhanov R, Gupta S, Satishkumar S, et al. (2007) Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and TRAIL in high-dose radiation-induced bystander signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 67: 11811–11820.
    1. Gow MD, Seymour CB, Byun SH, Mothersill CE (2008) Effect of dose rate on the radiation-induced bystander response. Phys Med Biol 53: 119–132.
    1. Shao C, Folkard M, Prise KM (2008) Role of TGF-beta1 and nitric oxide in the bystander response of irradiated glioma cells. Oncogene 27: 434–440.
    1. Zhou H, Ivanov VN, Lien YC, Davidson M, Hei TK (2008) Mitochondrial function and nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated signaling in radiation-induced bystander effects. Cancer Res 68: 2233–2240.
    1. Burdak-Rothkamm S, Short SC, Folkard M, Rothkamm K, Prise KM (2007) ATR-dependent radiation-induced gamma H2AX foci in bystander primary human astrocytes and glioma cells. Oncogene 26: 993–1002.
    1. Burdak-Rothkamm S, Rothkamm K, Prise KM (2008) ATM acts downstream of ATR in the DNA damage response signaling of bystander cells. Cancer Res 68: 7059–7065.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe