Guiding functional reorganization of motor redundancy using a body-machine interface
Dalia De Santis, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi, Dalia De Santis, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Abstract
Background: Body-machine interfaces map movements onto commands to external devices. Redundant motion signals derived from inertial sensors are mapped onto lower-dimensional device commands. Then, the device users face two problems, a) the structural problem of understanding the operation of the interface and b) the performance problem of controlling the external device with high efficiency. We hypothesize that these problems, while being distinct are connected in that aligning the space of body movements with the space encoded by the interface, i.e. solving the structural problem, facilitates redundancy resolution towards increasing efficiency, i.e. solving the performance problem.
Methods: Twenty unimpaired volunteers practiced controlling the movement of a computer cursor by moving their arms. Eight signals from four inertial sensors were mapped onto the two cursor's coordinates on a screen. The mapping matrix was initialized by asking each user to perform free-form spontaneous upper-limb motions and deriving the two main principal components of the motion signals. Participants engaged in a reaching task for 18 min, followed by a tracking task. One group of 10 participants practiced with the same mapping throughout the experiment, while the other 10 with an adaptive mapping that was iteratively updated by recalculating the principal components based on ongoing movements.
Results: Participants quickly reduced reaching time while also learning to distribute most movement variance over two dimensions. Participants with the fixed mapping distributed movement variance over a subspace that did not match the potent subspace defined by the interface map. In contrast, participant with the adaptive map reduced the difference between the two subspaces, resulting in a smaller amount of arm motions distributed over the null space of the interface map. This, in turn, enhanced movement efficiency without impairing generalization from reaching to tracking.
Conclusions: Aligning the potent subspace encoded by the interface map to the user's movement subspace guides redundancy resolution towards increasing movement efficiency, with implications for controlling assistive devices. In contrast, in the pursuit of rehabilitative goals, results would suggest that the interface must change to drive the statistics of user's motions away from the established pattern and toward the engagement of movements to be recovered.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01608438, Registered 16 April 2012.
Keywords: Body-machine interface; Forward model; Motor redundancy; Sensorimotor learning.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
- Moxon KA, Oliviero A, Aguilar J, Foffani G. Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: always for good? Neuroscience. 2014;283:78–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.056.
- Donati ARC, Shokur S, Morya E, Campos DSF, Moioli RC, Gitti CM, et al. Long-term training with a brain-machine Interface-based gait protocol induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30383. doi: 10.1038/srep30383.
- Dietz V, Fouad K. Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. Brain. 2014;137(3):654–667. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt262.
- Martinez M, Brezun J-M, Zennou-Azogui Y, Baril N, Xerri C. Sensorimotor training promotes functional recovery and somatosensory cortical map reactivation following cervical spinal cord injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30(12):2356–2367. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07019.x.
- Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen LG. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain. 2003;126(4):866–872. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg079.
- Jensen JL, Marstrand PCD, Nielsen JB. Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99(4):1558–1568. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01408.2004.
- Mawase F, Uehara S, Bastian AJ, Celnik P. Motor learning enhances use-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci. 2017;37(10):2673–2685. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3303-16.2017.
- Thorp EB, Abdollahi F, Chen D, Farshchiansadegh A, Lee M-H, Pedersen J, et al. Upper body-based power wheelchair control Interface for individuals with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(2):249–260. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2439240.
- Abdollahi F, Farshchiansadegh A, Pierella C, Seáñez-González I, Thorp EB, Lee M-H, et al. Body-machine Interface enables people with cervical spinal cord injury to control devices with available body movements: proof of concept. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(5):487–493. doi: 10.1177/1545968317693111.
- Pierella C, Abdollahi F, Farshchiansadegh A, Pedersen J, Chen D, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, et al. Body machine interfaces for neuromotor rehabilitation: a case study. In: 36th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. Chicago,IL: IEEE; 2014. p. 397–401.
- Seáñez-González I, Pierella C, Farshchiansadegh A, Thorp EB, Wang X, Parrish T, et al. Body-machine interfaces after spinal cord injury: rehabilitation and brain plasticity. Brain Sci. 2016;6(4):61. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6040061.
- Summa S, Pierella C, Giannoni P, Sciacchitano A, Iacovelli S, Farshchiansadegh A, et al. A body-machine interface for training selective pelvis movements in stroke survivors: A pilot study. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. IEEE; 2015. p. 4663–6.
- Sailer U, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS. Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. J Neurosci. 2005;25(39):8833–8842. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2658-05.2005.
- Wu HG, Miyamoto YR, Castro LNG, Ölveczky BP, Smith MA. Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(2):312–320. doi: 10.1038/nn.3616.
- Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Vol. 9, Current Opinion in Neurobiology. Elsevier Current Trends; 1999. p. 718–27.
- Lin TH, Denomme A, Ranganathan R. Learning alternative movement coordination patterns using reinforcement feedback. Exp Brain Res. 2018;236(5):1395–1407. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5227-1.
- Cortese A, De Martino B, Kawato M. The neural and cognitive architecture for learning from a small sample. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;55:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.02.011.
- Pierella C, Abdollahi F, Thorp EB, Farshchiansadegh A, Pedersen J, Seáñez-González I, et al. Learning new movements after paralysis: results from a home-based study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04930-z.
- Ranganathan R, Adewuyi A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to be lazy: exploiting redundancy in a novel task to minimize movement-related effort. J Neurosci. 2013;33(7):2754–2760. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1553-12.2013.
- Ranganathan R, Wieser J, Mosier KM, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Scheidt RA. Learning redundant motor tasks with and without overlapping dimensions: facilitation and interference effects. J Neurosci. 2014;34(24):8289–8299. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4455-13.2014.
- De Santis D, Dzialecka P, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Unsupervised coadaptation of an assistive Interface to facilitate sensorimotor learning of redundant control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE; 2018. p. 801–6.
- Braun DA, Mehring C, Wolpert DM. Structure learning in action. Behav Brain Res. 2010;206(2):157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.031.
- Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Mot Control. 2007;11(3):276–308. doi: 10.1123/mcj.11.3.276.
- Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE. Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20(4):695–715. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00073-2.
- Mosier KM, Scheidt RA, Acosta S, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(6):4362–4372. doi: 10.1152/jn.00380.2005.
- De Santis D, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Guiding the reorganization of motor redundancy for assistance and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. In: Biosystems and Biorobotics. Springer, Cham; 2019. p. 354–8.
- Liu X, Mosier KM, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Casadio M, Scheidt RA. Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105(1):454–473. doi: 10.1152/jn.00247.2010.
- Pierella C, De Luca A, Tasso E, Cervetto F, Gamba S, Losio L, et al. Changes in neuromuscular activity during motor training with a body-machine interface after spinal cord injury. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE; 2017. p. 1100–5.
- Farshchiansadegh A, Ranganathan R, Casadio M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptation to visual feedback delay in a redundant motor task. J Neurophysiol. 2015;113(2):426–433. doi: 10.1152/jn.00249.2014.
- Jeng JC. Adaptive process monitoring using efficient recursive PCA and moving window PCA algorithms. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2010;41(4):475–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2010.03.015.
- Cardot H, Degras D. Online principal component analysis in high dimension: which algorithm to choose? Int Stat Rev. 2018;86(1):29–50. doi: 10.1111/insr.12220.
- Weng J, Zhang Y, Hwang WS. Candid covariance-free incremental principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2003;25(8):1034–1040. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1217609.
- Schmitt E, Rato T, De Ketelaere B, Reis M, Hubert M. Parameter selection guidelines for adaptive PCA-based control charts. J Chemom. 2016;30(4):163–176. doi: 10.1002/cem.2783.
- Zhang Y, Weng J. Convergence analysis of complementary candid incremental principal component analysis. Michigan State Univ. 2001;(August):1–7.
- Cheng Lv J, Yi Z, Tan KK. Global convergence of Oja’s PCA learning algorithm with a non-zero-approaching adaptive learning rate. Theor Comput Sci. 2006;367(3):286–307. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2006.07.012.
- Yi Z, Ye M, Lv JC, Tan KK. Convergence analysis of a deterministic discrete time system of Oja’s PCA learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2005;16(6):1318–1328. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2005.852236.
- Oja E, Karhunen J. On stochastic approximation of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the expectation of a random matrix. J Math Anal Appl. 1985;106(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(85)90131-3.
- Orsborn AL, Dangi S, Moorman HG, Carmena JM. Exploring time-scales of closed-loop decoder adaptation in brain-machine interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. IEEE; 2011. p. 5436–9.
- Orsborn AL, Dangi S, Moorman HG, Carmena JM. Closed-loop decoder adaptation on intermediate time-scales facilitates rapid BMI performance improvements independent of decoder initialization conditions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20(4):468–477. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2185066.
- Casadio M, Ranganathan R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. The body-machine interface: a new perspective on an old theme. J Mot Behav. 2012;44(6):419–433. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.700968.
- Casadio M, Pressman A, Fishbach A, Danziger ZC, Acosta S, Chen D, et al. Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res. 2010;207(3–4):233–247. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2427-8.
- Sternad D. It’s not (only) the mean that matters: variability, noise and exploration in skill learning. Vol. 20, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. NIH Public Access; 2018. p. 183–95.
- King AC, Ranganathan R, Newell KM. Individual differences in the exploration of a redundant space-time motor task. Neurosci Lett. 2012;529(2):144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.08.014.
- Rohde M, Narioka K, Steil JJ, Klein LK, Ernst MO. Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition. Maloney LT, editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(3):e1006676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006676.
- Mehler DMA, Reichenbach A, Klein J, Diedrichsen J. Minimizing endpoint variability through reinforcement learning during reaching movements involving shoulder, elbow and wrist. van Beers RJ, editor. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180803.
- Golub MD, Sadtler PT, Oby ER, Quick KM, Ryu SI, Tyler-Kabara EC, et al. Learning by neural reassociation. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(4):607–616. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0095-3.
- Sadtler PT, Quick KM, Golub MD, Chase SM, Ryu SI, Tyler-Kabara EC, et al. Neural constraints on learning. Nature. 2014;512(7515):423–426. doi: 10.1038/nature13665.
- Hennig JA, Golub MD, Lund PJ, Sadtler PT, Oby ER, Quick KM, et al. Constraints on neural redundancy. Elife. 2018;15:7.
- Thorp EB, Kording KP, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Using noise to shape motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 2017;117:728–737. doi: 10.1152/jn.00493.2016.
- Koralek AC, Jin X, Long JD, Costa RM, Carmena JM. Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills. Nature. 2012;483(7389):331–335. doi: 10.1038/nature10845.
- Golub MD, Yu BM, Chase SM. Internal models engaged by brain-computer interface control. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. NIH Public Access; 2012. p. 1327–30.
- Pierella C, Abdollahi F, Farshchiansadegh A, Pedersen J, Thorp EB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, et al. Remapping residual coordination for controlling assistive devices and recovering motor functions. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Dec;79(Pt B):364–376.
- Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(4):263–273. doi: 10.1038/35067570.
- Lynskey JV, Belanger A, Jung R. Activity-dependent plasticity in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):229–240. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.03.0047.
- Fouad K, Tetzlaff W. Rehabilitative training and plasticity following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2012;235(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.009.
- Brown A, Martinez M. From cortex to cord: motor circuit plasticity after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14(12):2054. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.262572.
- Yavari F, Towhidkhah F, Ahmadi-Pajouh MA. Are fast/slow process in motor adaptation and forward/inverse internal model two sides of the same coin? Med Hypotheses. 2013;81(4):592–600. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.07.009.
- Dangi S, Orsborn AL, Moorman HG, Carmena JM. Design and analysis of closed-loop decoder adaptation algorithms for brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput. 2013;25(7):1693–1731. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00460.
- Ganguly K, Carmena JM. Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. Ashe J, editor. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(7):e1000153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000153.
- Shenoy KV, Carmena JM. Combining decoder design and neural adaptation in brain-machine interfaces. Neuron Cell Press. 2014;84:665–80.
- Shanechi MM, Orsborn AL, Carmena JM. Robust Brain-Machine Interface Design Using Optimal Feedback Control Modeling and Adaptive Point Process Filtering. Sporns O, editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(4):e1004730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004730.
- Zhang Y, Chase SM. Optimizing the usability of brain-computer interfaces. Neural Comput. 2018;30:1323–58.
- Couraud M, Cattaert D, Paclet F, Oudeyer PY, De Rugy A. Model and experiments to optimize co-adaptation in a simplified myoelectric control system. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(2):026006. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa87cf.
- Danziger ZC, Fishbach A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning algorithms for human-machine interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(5):1502–1511. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2013822.
- Tyč F, Boyadjian A. Plasticity of motor cortex induced by coordination and training. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(1):153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.022.
- Cardis M, Casadio M, Ranganathan R. High variability impairs motor learning regardless of whether it affects task performance. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119(1):39–48. doi: 10.1152/jn.00158.2017.
Source: PubMed