Preliminary Results of Initial Testing for Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the Emergency Department

Vaishal M Tolia, Theodore C Chan, Edward M Castillo, Vaishal M Tolia, Theodore C Chan, Edward M Castillo

Abstract

Introduction: On March 10, 2020, the World Health Organization declared a global pandemic due to widespread infection of the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). We report the preliminary results of a targeted program of COVID-19 infection testing in the ED in the first 10 days of its initiation at our institution.

Methods: We conducted a review of prospectively collected data on all ED patients who had targeted testing for acute COVID-19 infection at two EDs during the initial 10 days of testing (March 10-19, 2020). During this initial period with limited resources, testing was targeted toward high-risk patients per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Data collected from patients who were tested included demographics, clinical characteristics, and test qualifying criteria. We present the data overall and by test results with descriptive statistics.

Results: During the 10-day study period, the combined census of the study EDs was 2157 patient encounters. A total of 283 tests were ordered in the ED. The majority of patients were 18-64 years of age, male, non-Hispanic white, had an Emergency Severity Index score of three, did not have a fever, and were discharged from the ED. A total of 29 (10.2%) tested positive. Symptoms-based criteria most associated with COVID-19 were the most common criteria identified for testing (90.6%). All other criteria were reported in 5.51-43.0% of persons being tested. Having contact with a person under investigation was significantly more common in those who tested positive compared to those who tested negative (63% vs 24.5%, respectively). The majority of patients in both results groups had at least two qualifying criteria for testing (75.2%).

Conclusion: In this review of prospectively collected data on all ED patients who had targeted testing for acute COVID-19 infection at two EDs in the first 10 days of testing, we found that 10.2% of those tested were identified as positive. The continued monitoring of testing and results will help providers understand how COVID-19 is progressing in the community.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

References

    1. Mapping 2019-nCoV. [Accessed March 20, 2020]. Available at:
    1. Del Rio C, Malani PN. 2019 novel coronavirus – important information for clinicians. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1039–40.
    1. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) — United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 In Press.
    1. Holshue ML, Debolk C, Lindquist S, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. NEJM. 2020;382(10):929–36.
    1. Sharfstein JM, Becker SJ, Mellow MM. Diagnostic testing for the novel coronavirus. JAMA. 2020 In Press.
    1. Evaluating and testing persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [Accessed March 18, 2020]. Available at: .
    1. Bryson-Cahn C, Duchin J, Makarewicz VA, et al. A novel approach for a novel pathogen: using home assessment team to evaluate patients for 2019 novel coronavirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 In Press.
    1. Cases in U.S. [Accessed March 18, 2020]. Available at: .
    1. Testing in U.S. [Accessed March 18, 2020]. Available at: .

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe