Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives

Louise E Parker, Mona J Ritchie, Joann E Kirchner, Richard R Owen, Louise E Parker, Mona J Ritchie, Joann E Kirchner, Richard R Owen

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives Although many believe that evidence-based practice (EBP) has great potential, critics have identified limitations including a focus on randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence to the exclusion of other evidence types and a disregard for the art of medicine. Others have argued, however, that proper application of EBP involves reasoned consideration of a wide variety of information; thus, the dichotomy between medical science and art may be false. We explore the views of executive-level policymakers from the Veterans Health Administration, a leader in the EBP movement, regarding what constitutes evidence and the relative importance of evidence versus practical needs when determining clinical policy. Method We conducted 26 semi-structured qualitative interviews and performed a content analysis. Results Although informants generally believed in the value of EBP and the role of RCTs within it, they also valued other types of evidence. Further, they had concerns that were sometimes antithetical with strict adherence to an evidence-based approach. These included practical concerns, fit with organizational values and with local circumstances, resources, political pressures and patient needs. They were especially concerned about how to address medical conditions that affect many individuals or high-risk populations that have no evidence-based treatment. Conclusion When possible, health care practice should be evidence-based. When this is not possible, health care providers must turn to the art of medicine by using consensus-based best practices. Further, it is important for policymakers and researchers to work in concert to develop EBPs that are practical and meet needs.

References

    1. Greenhalgh T. Intuition and evidence – uneasy bedfellows? British Journal of General Practice. 2002;52(478):395–400.
    1. Gupta M. A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2003;9(2):111–121.
    1. Jenicek M. The hard art of soft science: evidence-based medicine, reasoned medicine or both? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12(4):410–419.
    1. Mykhalovskiy E, Weir L. The problem of evidence-based medicine: directions for social science. Social Science Medicine. 2004;59(5):1059–1069.
    1. Ashcroft RE. Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(2):131–135.
    1. Haynes RB. What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BioMed Central Health Service Research. 2002;2(3) Epub March 6. Available at: (last accessed 25 February 2008.
    1. Lewis S. Toward a general theory of indifference to research-based evidence. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2007;12(3):166–172.
    1. Upshur RE. Evidence-based medicine, reasoned medicine or both? Commentary on Jenicek, M. (2006) ‘The hard art of soft science’. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12(4):420–422.
    1. Grypdonck MHF. Qualitative health research in the era of evidence–based practice. Qualitative Health Research. 2006;16(10):1372–1385.
    1. Little M. ‘Better than numbers …’ A gentle critique of evidence-based medicine. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2003;73(4):177–182.
    1. Saarni SI, Gylling HA. Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(2):171–175.
    1. Sinclair S. Evidence-based medicine: a new ritual in medical teaching. British Medical Bulletin. 2004;69(1):179–196.
    1. Valkenburg G, Achterhuis H, Nijhof A. Fundamental shortcomings of evidence-based medicine. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2003;17(6):463–471.
    1. Morse JM. Beyond the clinical trial: expanding criteria for evidence. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(3):4.
    1. Berguer R. The evidence thing. Annuals of Vascular Surgery. 2004;18(3):265–270.
    1. Berwick DM. The science of improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;299(10):1182–1184.
    1. Danzer G, Rose M, Walter M, Klapp BF. On the theory of individual health. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2002;28(1):17–19.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP. Case reports in an evidence-based world. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1999;92(4):159–163.
    1. Vineis P. Evidence-based medicine and ethics: a practical approach. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(2):126–130.
    1. Greenhalgh T. Narrative-based medicine in an evidence-based world. British Medical Journal. 1999;318(7189):323–325.
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal. 1996;312(7023):71–72.
    1. Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet. 2001;358(9295):1818–1819.
    1. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A, McCormack B. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;47(1):81–90.
    1. Walshe CE, Caress AL, Chew-Graham C, Todd CJ. Case studies: a research strategy appropriate for palliative care? Palliative Medicine. 2004;18(8):677–684.
    1. Ghosh AK. On the challenges of using evidence-based information: the role of clinical uncertainty. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 2004;144(8):60–64.
    1. Buetow S, Kenealy T. Evidence-based medicine: the need for a new definition. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2000;6(2):85–92.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Worrall JG. From EBM to CSM: the evolution of context-sensitive medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 1997;3(2):105–108.
    1. Porta M. Is there life after evidence-based medicine? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2004;10(2):147–152.
    1. Demakis JG, McQueen L, Kizer KW, Feussner JR. Quality enhancement research initiative (QUERI): a collaboration between research and clinical practice. Medical Care. 2000;38(6) Suppl. 1:I-17–I-25.
    1. Muhr T. Atlas.ti Version 5.0. Berlin: Scientific Software Development; 2004.
    1. Patton MQ. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
    1. De Simone J. Beyond ‘faith-based medicine’ and EBM. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12(4):438–444.
    1. Parker LE, Kirchner JE, Bonner LM, Yano EM, Fickel JJ, Ritchie MJ, Simons CE. Creating a quality improvement dialogue: utilizing knowledge from frontline staff, managers, and experts to foster health care quality improvement. Qualitative Health Research. 2009;19(2):229–242.
    1. Parker LE, de Pillis E, Altschuler A, Rubenstein LV, Meredith LS. Balancing participation and expertise: a comparison of locally and centrally managed healthcare quality improvement within primary care practices. Qualitative Health Research. 2007;17(9):1268–1279.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe