Optimisation and validation of a remote monitoring system (Onco-TreC) for home-based management of oral anticancer therapies: an Italian multicentre feasibility study

Alessandro Passardi, Mimma Rizzo, Francesca Maines, Carlo Tondini, Alberto Zambelli, Roberto Vespignani, Daniele Andreis, Ilaria Massa, Marco Dianti, Stefano Forti, Enrico Maria Piras, Claudio Eccher, Alessandro Passardi, Mimma Rizzo, Francesca Maines, Carlo Tondini, Alberto Zambelli, Roberto Vespignani, Daniele Andreis, Ilaria Massa, Marco Dianti, Stefano Forti, Enrico Maria Piras, Claudio Eccher

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the growing number of oral agents available for cancer treatment, their efficacy may be reduced due to the lack of adherence, inappropriate adverse event self-management and arbitrary dose adjustment. The management of anticancer therapies could exponentially benefit from the introduction of mobile health technologies in a highly integrated electronic oncology system.

Methods and analysis: We plan to customise and fine-tune an existing monitoring TreC platform used in different chronic diseases in the oncology setting. This project follows a multistep approach with two major purposes: 1. participatory design techniques driven by Health Literacy and Patient Reported Outcomes principles in order to adapt the system to the oncology setting involving patients and healthcare providers; 2. a prospective training-validation, interventional, non-pharmacological, multicentre study on a series of consecutive patients with cancer (20 and 60 patients in the training and validation steps, respectively) in order to assess system capability, usability and acceptability. The novel Onco-TreC 2.0 is expected to contribute to improving the adherence and safety of cancer care, promoting patient empowerment and patient-doctor communication.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Independent Ethics Committees of the participating institutions (CEIIAV protocol Number 2549/2015; reference Number 1315-PU). Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and event presentations.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02921724); (Pre-results). Other study ID Number: IRST100.18.

Keywords: adherence; home-based healthcare management; oral anticancer agents; patient empowerment; safety.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of the diary showing the window that allows patients to register the tablets taken daily.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of the diary showing the window that allows patients to register the onset and intensity of therapy-related rash. The app helps patients to determine the toxicity grade by displaying explanatory texts and pictures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshot of the oncology dashboard via the web browser. Charts show patient health data, for example, weight, symptoms, personal observations and therapy adherence data.

References

    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005;353:487–97. 10.1056/NEJMra050100
    1. Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: who cares? Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:304–14. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0575
    1. Huang WC, Chen CY, Lin SJ, et al. . Medication adherence to oral anticancer drugs: systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016;16:423–32. 10.1586/14737140.2016.1159515
    1. Bergsbaken JJ, Eickhoff JC, Buss BA, et al. . Assessment of adherence with oral anticancer agents in oncology clinical trials: a systematic review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 201622:105–13. 10.1177/1078155214567163
    1. Greer JA, Amoyal N, Nisotel L, et al. . A systematic review of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapies. Oncologist 2016;21:354–76. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0405
    1. Fenerty SD, West C, Davis SA, et al. . The effect of reminder systems on patients' adherence to treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:127–35. 10.2147/PPA.S26314
    1. Vervloet M, van Dijk L, Santen-Reestman J, et al. . SMS reminders improve adherence to oral medication in type 2 diabetes patients who are real time electronically monitored. Int J Med Inform 2012;81:594–604. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.005
    1. Oakley C, Lennan E, Roe H, et al. . Safe practice and nursing care of patients receiving oral anti-cancer medicines: a position statement from UKONS. Ecancermedicalscience 2010;4:177 10.3332/ecancer.2010.177
    1. Mathes T, Antoine SL, Pieper D, et al. . Adherence enhancing interventions for oral anticancer agents: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 201440:102–8. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.07.004
    1. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ 2007;335:24–7. 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80
    1. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, et al. . Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:1228–39. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x
    1. Lees J, Chan A. Polypharmacy in elderly patients with Cancer: clinical implications and management. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:1249–57. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70040-7
    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Cmaj 1995;152:1423–33.
    1. Anglada-Martínez H, Martin-Conde M, Rovira-Illamola M, et al. . Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a web and Smartphone-Based medication Self-Management Platform for Chronically Ill Patients. J Med Syst 2016;40:99 10.1007/s10916-016-0456-y
    1. Weaver A, Young AM, Rowntree J, et al. . Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1887–92. 10.1093/annonc/mdm354
    1. Paré G, Moqadem K, Pineau G, et al. . Clinical effects of home telemonitoring in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e21 10.2196/jmir.1357
    1. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. . Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:120–7. 10.1258/jtt.2009.090812
    1. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. . Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:68–76. 10.1258/jtt.2009.090406
    1. Eccher C, Piras EM, Stenico M. TreC - a REST-based regional PHR. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:108–12.
    1. Franceschi R, Cauvin V, Piras EM, et al. . Trec diabetes: a new telemedicine system In: Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2014. Presented at: ATTD 2014, 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; February 5-8, 2014; Wien.
    1. Maria Piras E, Zanutto A. ‘One day it will be you who tells us doctors what to do!’. Exploring the ‘Personal’of PHR in paediatric diabetes management. Info Tech People 2014;27:421–39. 10.1108/ITP-02-2013-0030
    1. Eccher C, Botteri M, Ortolani D, et al. . A mobile logbook to diagnose masked hypertension: a pilot application. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014;205:363–7.
    1. Galligioni E, Piras EM, Galvagni M, et al. . Integrating mHealth in Oncology: experience in the Province of Trento. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e114 10.2196/jmir.3743
    1. Masini C, Nanni O, Antaridi S, et al. . Automated preparation of chemotherapy: quality improvement and economic sustainability. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014;71:579–85. 10.2146/ajhp130489
    1. Galligioni E, Berloffa F, Caffo O, et al. . Development and daily use of an electronic oncological patient record for the total management of Cancer patients: 7 years' experience. Ann Oncol 2009;20:349–52. 10.1093/annonc/mdn567
    1. Sanders EBN. From user-centered to participatory design approaches Taylor & Francis. London: Design and the social sciences, 2002.
    1. CTCAE is widely accepted throughout the oncology community as the standard classification and severity grading scale for adverse events in cancer therapy clinical trials and other oncology settings The National Cancer Institute issued the CTCAE version 4.0 on May 29, 2009. An updated version (4.03) is now in use as of June 14, 2010. PDF of CTCAE v 4.03 can be downloaded at. (accessed 26 July, 2016).
    1. Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic illness therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:79 10.1186/1477-7525-1-79
    1. Costantini M, Musso M, Viterbori P, et al. . Detecting psychological distress in Cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital anxiety and depression Scale. Support Care Cancer 1999;7:121–7. 10.1007/s005200050241
    1. Brooke J. SUS: A ‘quick and dirty usability scale’ In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, Usability evaluation in industry. London, Taylor & Francis, 1996:189–94.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe