Reconstruction of sternal defects after sternotomy with postoperative osteomyelitis, using a unilateral pectoralis major advancement muscle flap

Alexander Wyckman, Islam Abdelrahman, Ingrid Steinvall, Johann Zdolsek, Hans Granfeldt, Folke Sjöberg, Hans Nettelblad, Moustafa Elmasry, Alexander Wyckman, Islam Abdelrahman, Ingrid Steinvall, Johann Zdolsek, Hans Granfeldt, Folke Sjöberg, Hans Nettelblad, Moustafa Elmasry

Abstract

Background: The pectoralis major flap, which is usually harvested bilaterally, is considered a workhorse flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects. After a median sternotomy for open heart surgery, 1%-3% of patients develop deep infection and dehiscence of the sternal wound, some of which will eventually require reconstructive surgery. Our aim was to describe the clinical feasibility and associated complications of the unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients who were operated on using a unilateral pectoralis major flap for reconstruction of the chest wall at the Linköping University Hospital during 2008-18 was made using data retrieved from medical records.

Results: Forty-three patients had reconstructions with unilateral pectoralis major flaps. Three flaps failed completely, and another 10 patients developed complications that required further operation. The factors that were independently associated with loss of the flaps and complications were: older age, male sex, the number of different antibiotics used, and a long duration of treatment with negative wound pressure. Fewer wound revisions before the reconstruction resulted in more complications. The factors that were independently associated with prolonged time to complete healing were emergency reoperation after the initial operation and complications after reconstruction.

Conclusion: The unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap has proved to be a useful technique in the reconstruction of most sternal defects after sternal wound infection in older patients. There is, however, need for a follow-up study on a larger number of procedures to evaluate the long-term outcome compared with other methods of sternal reconstruction.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing the selection of patients. ZZR30 is the ICD-10-SE procedure code for “reconstruction with a muscle flap”. A total of 45 reconstructions of sternal defects were done with muscle flap, 43 with a unilateral pectoralis muscle flap, one with bilateral pectoralis muscle flaps and one with another muscle flap.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart showing different times of admissions for patients who had open heart surgery and were later readmitted for revision surgery, treatment using negative wound pressure, and antibiotics, when they developed signs of sternal instability or sternal infection, or both. If reconstructive surgery was indicated, the necessary flap was revised. The last visit, when the antibiotic treatment could be ended, was classed as the end point for healing of the defect. NPWT = negative pressure wound therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Sternal wound with deep infection after cardiac surgery. (B). Sternal wound after debridement. (C) The left pectoralis major muscle being mobilized after dissection. (D) The pectoral flap sutured in place to cover the defect. (E) After skin closure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A set of special long surgical instruments: long retractor, bipolar diathermy forceps, tweezers, straight and curved scissors.

References

    1. Gudbjartsson T, et al. Sternal wound infections following open heart surgery - a review. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016;50:341–48. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2016.1180427.
    1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.
    1. Abu-Omar Y, et al. European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery expert consensus statement on the prevention and management of mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:10–29. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw326.
    1. Ascherman JA, Patel SM, Malhotra SM, Smith CR. Management of sternal wounds with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps in 114 consecutively treated patients: refinements in technique and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:676–83. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000130939.32238.3B.
    1. Jones, G. et al. Management of the infected median sternotomy wound with muscle flaps. The Emory 20-year experience. Ann Surg, 225, 766–76, discussion 76-8 (1997).
    1. Juhl AA, Koudahl V, Damsgaard TE. Deep sternal wound infection after open heart surgery–reconstructive options. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2012;46:254–61. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2012.674549.
    1. Kaul P. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:94. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0656-7.
    1. Neligan, P. C. Plastic Surgery: 6-Volume Set, 3rd Edition. In 3rd ed., 247–51 (2013).
    1. Eriksson J, Huljebrant I, Nettelblad H, Svedjeholm R. Functional impairment after treatment with pectoral muscle flaps because of deep sternal wound infection. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2011;45:174–80. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2011.563318.
    1. Brutus JP, Nikolis A, Perreault I, Harris PG, Cordoba C. The unilateral pectoralis major island flap, an efficient and straightforward procedure for reconstruction of full length sternal defects after postoperative mediastinal wound infection. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:803–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.05.024.
    1. Erez E, et al. Pectoralis major muscle flap for deep sternal wound infection in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:572–7. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01075-9.
    1. Fernandez-Palacios J, Abad C, Garcia-Duque O, Baeta P. Postoperative mediastinitis in open heart surgery patients. Treatment with unilateral or bilateral pectoralis major muscle flap? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010;51:765–71.
    1. Horacio GS, et al. Application of Unilateral Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap in the Treatment of Sternal Wound Dehiscence. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;32:378–82.
    1. Zeitani J, et al. Early and long-term results of pectoralis muscle flap reconstruction versus sternal rewiring following failed sternal closure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:e144–50. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt080.
    1. Zahiri HR, et al. Pectoralis major turnover versus advancement technique for sternal wound reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:211–5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182367dc5.
    1. Berg LT, Jaakkola P. Kuopio treatment strategy after deep sternal wound infection. Scand J Surg. 2013;102:3–8. doi: 10.1177/145749691310200102.
    1. Izaddoost S, Withers EH. Sternal reconstruction with omental and pectoralis flaps: a review of 415 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:296–300. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822af843.
    1. Molenkamp S, Waterbolk TW, Mariani MA, Werker PM. Predictors of Complications After Pectoralis Major Transposition for Sternum Dehiscence. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:208–12. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000846.
    1. Lindsey, J. T. A retrospective analysis of 48 infected sternal wound closures: delayed closure decreases wound complications. Plast Reconstr Surg., 109, 1882–5, discussion 86-7 (2002).
    1. Sjogren J, Gustafsson R, Nilsson J, Malmsjo M, Ingemansson R. Clinical outcome after poststernotomy mediastinitis: vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional treatment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:2049–55. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.048.
    1. Sjogren J, Malmsjo M, Gustafsson R, Ingemansson R. Poststernotomy mediastinitis: a review of conventional surgical treatments, vacuum-assisted closure therapy and presentation of the Lund University Hospital mediastinitis algorithm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:898–905. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.09.020.
    1. Calcaterra D, Garcia-Covarrubias L, Ricci M, Salerno TA. Treatment of mediastinitis with wound-vacuum without muscle flaps. J Card Surg. 2009;24:512–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00808.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe