Computer-delivered and web-based interventions to improve depression, anxiety, and psychological well-being of university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

E Bethan Davies, Richard Morriss, Cris Glazebrook, E Bethan Davies, Richard Morriss, Cris Glazebrook

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety are common mental health difficulties experienced by university students and can impair academic and social functioning. Students are limited in seeking help from professionals. As university students are highly connected to digital technologies, Web-based and computer-delivered interventions could be used to improve students' mental health. The effectiveness of these intervention types requires investigation to identify whether these are viable prevention strategies for university students.

Objective: The intent of the study was to systematically review and analyze trials of Web-based and computer-delivered interventions to improve depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and stress in university students.

Methods: Several databases were searched using keywords relating to higher education students, mental health, and eHealth interventions. The eligibility criteria for studies included in the review were: (1) the study aimed to improve symptoms relating to depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and stress, (2) the study involved computer-delivered or Web-based interventions accessed via computer, laptop, or tablet, (3) the study was a randomized controlled trial, and (4) the study was trialed on higher education students. Trials were reviewed and outcome data analyzed through random effects meta-analyses for each outcome and each type of trial arm comparison. Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality.

Results: A total of 17 trials were identified, in which seven were the same three interventions on separate samples; 14 reported sufficient information for meta-analysis. The majority (n=13) were website-delivered and nine interventions were based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). A total of 1795 participants were randomized and 1480 analyzed. Risk of bias was considered moderate, as many publications did not sufficiently report their methods and seven explicitly conducted completers' analyses. In comparison to the inactive control, sensitivity meta-analyses supported intervention in improving anxiety (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.56; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.35, P<.001), depression (pooled SMD -0.43; 95% CI -0.63 to -0.22, P<.001), and stress (pooled SMD -0.73; 95% CI -1.27 to -0.19, P=.008). In comparison to active controls, sensitivity analyses did not support either condition for anxiety (pooled SMD -0.18; 95% CI -0.98 to 0.62, P=.66) or depression (pooled SMD -0.28; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.20, P=.25). In contrast to a comparison intervention, neither condition was supported in sensitivity analyses for anxiety (pooled SMD -0.10; 95% CI -0.39 to 0.18, P=.48) or depression (pooled SMD -0.33; 95% CI -0.43 to 1.09, P=.40).

Conclusions: The findings suggest Web-based and computer-delivered interventions can be effective in improving students' depression, anxiety, and stress outcomes when compared to inactive controls, but some caution is needed when compared to other trial arms and methodological issues were noticeable. Interventions need to be trialed on more heterogeneous student samples and would benefit from user evaluation. Future trials should address methodological considerations to improve reporting of trial quality and address post-intervention skewed data.

Keywords: anxiety; depression; health promotion; intervention; mental health; meta-analysis; students; systematic review; universities.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart outlining process for systematic review/meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breakdown of each type of risk of bias identified in the included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis of post-intervention anxiety outcomes for intervention compared to inactive controls.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sensitivity analysis of post-intervention depression outcomes for intervention compared to inactive controls.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Attrition rates for intervention vs inactive control conditions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Attrition rates for intervention vs. active control conditions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Sensitivity analysis of post-intervention anxiety outcomes for intervention compared to comparison intervention.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Sensitivity analysis of post-intervention depression outcomes for intervention compared to comparison intervention.

References

    1. Zivin K, Eisenberg D, Gollust SE, Golberstein E. Persistence of mental health problems and needs in a college student population. J Affect Disord. 2009 Oct;117(3):180–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001.
    1. Ibrahim AK, Kelly SJ, Adams CE, Glazebrook C. A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.015.
    1. Macaskill A. The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 2013 Aug;41(4):426–441. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2012.743110.
    1. Farrer L, Gulliver A, Chan JK, Batterham PJ, Reynolds J, Calear A, Tait R, Bennett K, Griffiths KM. Technology-based interventions for mental health in tertiary students: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2639.
    1. Andrews B, Wilding JM. The relation of depression and anxiety to life-stress and achievement in students. Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):509–21. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369802.
    1. Hysenbegasi A, Hass SL, Rowland CR. The impact of depression on the academic productivity of university students. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Sep;8(3):145–51.
    1. Russell G, Shaw S. A study to investigate the prevalence of social anxiety in a sample of higher education students in the United Kingdom. J Ment Health. 2009 Jan;18(3):198–206. doi: 10.1080/09638230802522494.
    1. Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust SE. Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Med Care. 2007 Jul;45(7):594–601. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb4c1.
    1. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113.
    1. Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P, Lange A, Ritterband L, Andersson G. Establishing guidelines for executing and reporting Internet intervention research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2011 Jun;40(2):82–97. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.573807.
    1. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Bolles JR, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1807–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02691.x.
    1. Ryan ML, Shochet IM, Stallman HM. Universal online interventions might engage psychologically distressed university students who are unlikely to seek formal help. Advances in Mental Health. 2010 Aug;9(1):73–83. doi: 10.5172/jamh.9.1.73.
    1. Taylor CB, Luce KH. Computer- and internet-based psychotherapy interventions. Current Directions in Psychol Sci. 2003 Feb;12(1):18–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01214.
    1. Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklícek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):319–28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008944.
    1. Kaltenthaler E, Parry G, Beverley C, Ferriter M. Computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;193(3):181–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025981.
    1. Grist R, Cavanagh K. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for common mental health disorders, what works, for whom under what circumstances? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Contemp Psychother. 2013;43(4):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9243-y.
    1. Foroushani PS, Schneider J, Assareh N. Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-131.
    1. Escoffery C, Miner KR, Adame DD, Butler S, McCormick L, Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53(4):183–8. doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.4.183-188.
    1. Rickwood D, Bradford S. The role of self-help in the treatment of mild anxiety disorders in young people: an evidence-based review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2012;5:25–36. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S23357.
    1. Mitchell N, Gordon PK. Attitudes towards computerized CBT for depression amongst a student population. Behav Cognit Psychother. 2007 May 14;35(04):421. doi: 10.1017/S1352465807003700.
    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. 2011. [2014-04-01]. Mental health of students in higher education .
    1. Lintvedt OK, S⊘rensen K, Østvik AR, Verplanken B, Wang CE. The need for Web-based cognitive behavior therapy among university students. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2008 Jul 03;26(2-4):239–258. doi: 10.1080/15228830802096705.
    1. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Brewer JL. A systematic review of help-seeking interventions for depression, anxiety and general psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-81.
    1. Yager Z, O'Dea JA. Prevention programs for body image and eating disorders on university campuses: a review of large, controlled interventions. Health Promot Int. 2008 Jun;23(2):173–89. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan004.
    1. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B. The effectiveness of Web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption--a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008 Jul;47(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.005.
    1. Givi H, Imani H, Agh A, Mohammadipourrik N, Mehrabadi S. Efficiency of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy versus clinical intervention for the treatment of major depression translated from Farsi. Koomesh: Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences. 2012;13(2):218–24.
    1. Kenardy J, McCafferty K, Rosa V. Internet-delivered indicated prevention for anxiety disorders: Six-month follow-up. Clinical Psychologist. 2006;10(1):39–42. doi: 10.1080/13284200500378746.
    1. Arpin-Cribbie C, Irvine J, Ritvo P. Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for perfectionism: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Res. 2012 Mar;22(2):194–207. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.637242.
    1. Arpin-Cribbie CA, Irvine J, Ritvo P, Cribbie RA, Flett GL, Hewitt PL. Perfectionism and psychological distress: A modeling approach to understanding their therapeutic relationship. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther. 2008 Feb 27;26(3):151–167. doi: 10.1007/s10942-007-0065-2.
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration . Review Manager Software (RevMan) (Version 5.1) Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2012. [2014-05-09]. .
    1. Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ. In: Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research. Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ, editors. Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 1994.
    1. Johansson R, Andersson G. Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Jul;12(7):861–70. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.63.
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1200.
    1. Hedges LV, Vevea JL. Estimating effect size under publication bias: Small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1996 Jan 01;21(4):299–332. doi: 10.3102/10769986021004299.
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169–83. doi: 10.1037/a0018555.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
    1. Radhu N, Daskalakis ZJ, Arpin-Cribbie CA, Irvine J, Ritvo P. Evaluating a Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for maladaptive perfectionism in university students. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(5):357–66. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.630703.
    1. Braithwaite SR, Fincham FD. ePREP: Computer based prevention of relationship dysfunction, depression and anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2007 May;26(5):609–622. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.609.
    1. Braithwaite SR, Fincham FD. A randomized clinical trial of a computer based preventive intervention: replication and extension of ePREP. J Fam Psychol. 2009 Feb;23(1):32–8. doi: 10.1037/a0014061.
    1. Cukrowicz KC, Joiner TE. Computer-based intervention for anxious and depressive symptoms in a non-clinical population. Cogn Ther Res. 2007 Apr 4;31(5):677–693. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9094-x.
    1. Day V, McGrath PJ, Wojtowicz M. Internet-based guided self-help for university students with anxiety, depression and stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Behav Res Ther. 2013 Jul;51(7):344–51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.03.003.
    1. Ellis LA, Campbell AJ, Sethi S, O'Dea BM. Comparative randomized trial of an online cognitive-behavioral therapy program and an online support group for depression and anxiety. J Cyber Ther Rehabil. 2011;4(4):461–7.
    1. Kenardy J, McCafferty K, Rosa V. Internet-delivered indicated prevention for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Behav Cognit Psychother. 2003;31(3):279–289. doi: 10.1017/S1352465803003047.
    1. Lintvedt OK, Griffiths KM, Sørensen K, Østvik AR, Wang CE, Eisemann M, Waterloo K. Evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of unguided Internet-based self-help intervention for the prevention of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013;20(1):10–27. doi: 10.1002/cpp.770.
    1. Sethi S, Campbell AJ, Ellis LA. The use of computerized self-help packages to treat adolescent depression and anxiety. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2010 Aug 31;28(3):144–160. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2010.508317.
    1. Taitz I. Learning lucid dreaming and its effect on depression in undergraduates. International Journal of Dream Research. 2011;4(2):117–26. doi: 10.11588/ijodr.2011.2.9123.
    1. Botella C, Gallego MJ, Garcia-Palacios A, Guillen V, Baños RM, Quero S, Alcañiz M. An Internet-based self-help treatment for fear of public speaking: a controlled trial. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Aug;13(4):407–21. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0224.
    1. Chiauzzi E, Brevard J, Thum C, Thurn C, Decembrele S, Lord S. MyStudentBody-Stress: an online stress management intervention for college students. J Health Commun. 2008 Sep;13(6):555–72. doi: 10.1080/10810730802281668.
    1. Cavanagh K, Strauss C, Cicconi F, Griffiths N, Wyper A, Jones F. A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention. Behav Res Ther. 2013 Sep;51(9):573–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.003.
    1. Rose RD, Buckey JC, Zbozinek TD, Motivala SJ, Glenn DE, Cartreine JA, Craske MG. A randomized controlled trial of a self-guided, multimedia, stress management and resilience training program. Behav Res Ther. 2013 Feb;51(2):106–12. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.11.003.
    1. Kanekar A, Sharma M, Atri A. Enhancing social support, hardiness, and acculturation to improve mental health among Asian Indian international students. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2009;30(1):55–68. doi: 10.2190/IQ.30.1.e.
    1. Orbach G, Lindsay S, Grey S. A randomised placebo-controlled trial of a self-help Internet-based intervention for test anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Mar;45(3):483–96. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.04.002.
    1. Bitsika V, Sharpley CF, Rubenstein V. What stresses university students: An interview investigation of the demands of tertiary studies. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 2010;20(1):41–54. doi: 10.1375/ajgc.20.1.41.
    1. Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1101–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003.
    1. Currie SL, McGrath PJ, Day V. Development and usability of an online CBT program for symptoms of moderate depression, anxiety, and stress in post-secondary students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010 Nov;26(6):1419–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.020.
    1. Schunemann H, Oxman A, Higgins JPT, Vist G, Glasziou P, Guyatt G. Presenting results and 'summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;c332:340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
    1. Göritz A. Incentives in Web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science. 2006;1(1):58–70.
    1. Davy BM, Potter KL, Dennis Parker EA, Harden S, Hill JL, Halliday TM, Estabrooks PA. Feasibility, effectiveness, and perceptions of an Internet-and incentive-based behavioral weight loss intervention for overweight and obese college freshmen: A mixed methods approach. OJPM. 2013;3(7):429–440. doi: 10.4236/ojpm.2013.37058.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194.
    1. Waller R, Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychol Med. 2009 May;39(5):705–12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004224.
    1. Lieb K, Völlm B, Rücker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4–12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984.
    1. Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C. Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction. 2011 Feb;106(2):267–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03214.x.
    1. Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jun;32(4):329–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004.
    1. Donker T, Griffiths KM, Cuijpers P, Christensen H. Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2009;7:79. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-79.
    1. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):42–6.
    1. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D. Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Willyard C. Men: A growing minority? 2011. [2013-11-21]. .
    1. Ridge D, Emslie C, White A. Understanding how men experience, express and cope with mental distress: where next? Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Jan;33(1):145–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01266.x.
    1. Ellis LA, Collin P, Hurley PJ, Davenport TA, Burns JM, Hickie IB. Young men's attitudes and behaviour in relation to mental health and technology: implications for the development of online mental health services. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-119.
    1. Yamaguchi S, Wu SI, Biswas M, Yate M, Aoki Y, Barley EA, Thornicroft G. Effects of short-term interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma in university or college students: a systematic review. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jun;201(6):490–503. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829480df.
    1. Malpass A, Shaw A, Kessler D, Sharp D. Concordance between PHQ-9 scores and patients' experiences of depression: a mixed methods study. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jun;60(575):e231–8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X502119.
    1. Davis-McCabe C. CALM: Two years on - students’ experience of the CALM approach. Association for University and College Counselling Journal. 2009;November:25–7.
    1. Ultrasis Leading universities purchase Relief series and Beating the Blues programmes. 2008. Feb 13, [2013-11-28]. .
    1. Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, Clarke J, Birch MR, Christensen H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2791.
    1. Grassi A, Gaggioli A, Riva G. New technologies to manage exam anxiety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;167:57–62.
    1. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002.
    1. Regehr C, Glancy D, Pitts A. Interventions to reduce stress in university students: a review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2013 May 15;148(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.026.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe