Statistical methods used in the public health literature and implications for training of public health professionals
Matthew J Hayat, Amanda Powell, Tessa Johnson, Betsy L Cadwell, Matthew J Hayat, Amanda Powell, Tessa Johnson, Betsy L Cadwell
Abstract
Statistical literacy and knowledge is needed to read and understand the public health literature. The purpose of this study was to quantify basic and advanced statistical methods used in public health research. We randomly sampled 216 published articles from seven top tier general public health journals. Studies were reviewed by two readers and a standardized data collection form completed for each article. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. Results were summarized for statistical methods used in the literature, including descriptive and inferential statistics, modeling, advanced statistical techniques, and statistical software used. Approximately 81.9% of articles reported an observational study design and 93.1% of articles were substantively focused. Descriptive statistics in table or graphical form were reported in more than 95% of the articles, and statistical inference reported in more than 76% of the studies reviewed. These results reveal the types of statistical methods currently used in the public health literature. Although this study did not obtain information on what should be taught, information on statistical methods being used is useful for curriculum development in graduate health sciences education, as well as making informed decisions about continuing education for public health professionals.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- delMas R., Garfi eld J., Ooms A., & Chance B. 2007. Assessing students’conceptual understanding after a first course in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 28–58.
- Arnold LD, Braganza M, Salih R, Colditz GA. 2013. Statistical trends in the Journal of the American Medical Association and implications for training across the continuum of medical education. PLoS One, 8(10):e77301 doi:
- ASPPH Education Committee. 2006. Master’s Degree in Public Health Core Competency Development Project, Version 2.31, downloaded 8/25/2016 at .
- Council on Education for Public Health (2016). Accreditation Criteria: Schools of Public Health and Public Health Programs. Silver Spring, MD: Author;
- Sullivan LM, Hooper L, Begg MD. 2014. Effective practices for teaching the biostatistics core course for the MPH using a competency-based approach. Public Health Rep 129:381–92 doi:
- Dean AG, Arner TG, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, Sangam S, Zubieta JC, Sullivan KM, Brendel KA, Gao Z, Fontaine N, Shu M, Fuller G, Smith DC, Nitschke DA, and Fagan RF. Epi Info™, a database and statistics program for public health professionals. CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
- Slakter MJ, Wu YW, Suzuki-Slakter NS. 1991. “*, **, and ***; statistical nonsense at the .00000 level.” Nursing Research, 40(4): 248–9.
- Hayat M.J. 2010. "Understanding Statistical Significance," Nursing Research, May-Jun: 59(3), 219–223. doi:
- Hayat M.J., Hedlin H. 2012. “Modern Statistical Modeling Approaches for Analyzing Repeated-Measures Data.” Nursing Research, 61(3), 188–194. doi:
- Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–65. doi:
Source: PubMed