Psychometric properties of the brief pain inventory modified for proxy report of pain interference in children with cerebral palsy with and without cognitive impairment

Chantel C Barney, Stacy M Stibb, Alyssa M Merbler, Rebekah L S Summers, Supreet Deshpande, Linda E Krach, Frank J Symons, Chantel C Barney, Stacy M Stibb, Alyssa M Merbler, Rebekah L S Summers, Supreet Deshpande, Linda E Krach, Frank J Symons

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of physical disability in children and is often associated with secondary musculoskeletal pain. Cerebral palsy is a heterogeneous condition with wide variability in motor and cognitive capacities. Although pain scales exist, there remains a need for a validated chronic pain assessment tool with high clinical utility for use across such a heterogeneous patient population with and without cognitive impairment.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was an initial assessment of several psychometric properties of the 12-item modified brief pain inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale as a proxy-report tool in a heterogeneous sample of children with CP with and without cognitive impairment.

Methods: Participants (n = 167; 47% male; mean age = 9.1 years) had pain assessments completed through caregiver report in clinic before spasticity treatment (for a subgroup, the modified BPI was repeated after procedure). To measure concurrent validity, we obtained pain intensity ratings (Numeric Rating Scale of pain) and pain intensity, duration, and frequency scores (Dalhousie Pain Interview).

Results: Modified BPI scores were internally consistent (Cronbach α = 0.96) and correlated significantly with Numeric Rating Scale intensity scores (rs = 0.67, P < 0.001), Dalhousie Pain Interview pain intensity (rs = 0.65, P < 0.001), pain frequency (rs = 0.56, P = 0.02), and pain duration scores (rs = 0.42, P = 0.006). Modified BPI scores also significantly decreased after spasticity treatment (pretest [scored 0-10; 3.27 ± 2.84], posttest [2.27 ± 2.68]; t (26) = 2.14, 95% confidence interval [0.04-1.95], P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Overall, the modified BPI produced scores with strong internal consistency and that had concurrent validity as a proxy-report tool for children with CP.

Keywords: Brief pain inventory; Cerebral palsy; Children; Dalhousie Pain Interview; Numeric Rating Scale; Pain intensity; Pain interference.

Conflict of interest statement

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relationship between the modified brief pain inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale score (scored 0–120) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity score (scored 0–10).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship between the modified brief pain inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale score (scored 0–120) and the Dalhousie Pain Interview (DPI) pain intensity measure (each pain type is scored 0–10 then summed for a total score).

References

    1. Barney CC, Krach LE, Rivard PF, Belew JL, Symons FJ. Motor function predicts parent-reported musculoskeletal pain in children with cerebral palsy. Pain Res Manag 2013;18:323–7.
    1. Batalha LM, Mota AA. Massage in children with cancer: effectiveness of a protocol. J Pediatr 2013;89:595–600.
    1. Beauregard L, Pomp A, Choinière M. Severity and impact of pain after day-surgery. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:304.
    1. Bodkin AW, Robinson C, Perales FP. Reliability and validity of the gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 2003;15:247–52.
    1. Breau LM, Camfield CS, McGrath PJ, Finley GA. The incidence of pain in children with severe cognitive impairments. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:1219–26.
    1. Breau LM, Camfield CS, McGrath PJ, Finley GA. Pain's impact on adaptive functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res 2007;51(pt 2):125–34.
    1. Breau LM, McGrath PJ, Camfield CS, Finley GA. Psychometric properties of the non-communicating children's pain checklist-revised. PAIN 2002;99:349–57.
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. PAIN 2005;113:9–19.
    1. Engel JM, Kartin D, Carter GT, Jensen MP, Jaffe KM. Pain in youths with neuromuscular disease. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2009;26:405–12.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. PAIN 2001;94:149–58.
    1. Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990;17:1022–4.
    1. Hunt A, Goldman A, Seers K, Crichton N, Mastroyannopoulou K, Moffat V, Oulton K, Brady M. Clinical validation of the paediatric pain profile. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46:9–18.
    1. Lara-Munoz C, De Leon SP, Feinstein AR, Puente A, Wells CK. Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli. Arch Med Res 2004;35:43–8.
    1. McDowell BC, Kerr C, Parkes J. Interobserver agreement of the gross motor function classification system in an ambulant population of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49:528–33.
    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N; International Association for the Study of Pain, Task Force on Taxonomy. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed Seattle: IASP Press, 1994.
    1. Osborne TL, Raichle KA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Kraft G. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;32:217–29.
    1. Ramstad K, Jahnsen R, Skjeldal OH, Diseth TH. Mental health, health related quality of life and recurrent musculoskeletal pain in children with cerebral palsy 8-18 years old. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1589–95.
    1. Rivard PF, Nugent AC, Symons FJ. Parent-proxy ratings of pain before and after botulinum toxin type A treatment for children with spasticity and cerebral palsy. Clin J Pain 2009;25:413–7.
    1. Rosenbaum P. Cerebral palsy: what parents and doctors want to know. BMJ 2003;326:970–4.
    1. Shi Q, Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Pandya KJ, Cleeland CS. Assessing persistent cancer pain: a comparison of current pain ratings and pain recalled from the past week. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:168–74.
    1. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004;5:133–7.
    1. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, Cleeland C, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Galer BS, Hewitt DJ, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robinson JP, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Witter J. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. PAIN 2003;106:337–45.
    1. Tyler EJ, Jensen MP, Engel JM, Schwartz L. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:236–9.
    1. Varni JW, Stucky BD, Thissen D, DeWitt EM, Irwin DE, Lai J, Yeatts K, DeWalt DA. PROMIS pediatric pain interference scale: an item response theory of the pediatric pain item bank. J Pain 2010;11:1109–19.
    1. Westborn L, Rimstedt A, Nordmark E. Assessments of pain in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a retrospective population based registry study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2017;59:858–63.
    1. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005;14:798–804.
    1. Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000;42:292–6.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe