Intermediate-term outcome of cryoballoon ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and improvements in quality of life of patients

Daniel Mol, Anchee M Boersma, Wouter R Berger, Muchtiar Khan, Gijsbert S de Ruiter, Geert-Jan P Kimman, Joris R de Groot, Jonas S S G de Jong, Daniel Mol, Anchee M Boersma, Wouter R Berger, Muchtiar Khan, Gijsbert S de Ruiter, Geert-Jan P Kimman, Joris R de Groot, Jonas S S G de Jong

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been predominantly focused on the reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the maintenance of sinus rhythm. However, there has been a limited intermediate follow-up on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) of patients. Given the relatively high recurrence rate of persistent AF after PVI treatment, it is important to follow up with clinical outcomes on symptom improvement as well as health-related quality-of-life. This study was designed to investigate the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa), AF-related symptoms and HRQoL after PVI in patients with persistent AF who were treated with the second generation cryoballoon.

Methods: Total 148 patients participated in the study who were treated by PVI between 2013 and 2017 for persistent AF. All patients visited the out-patient clinic 2-5 years after PVI. During this visit all patients filled-out an AF Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire and a seven-day Holter was applied. All rhythm recordings acquired post ablation were collected and analysed, and the modified European Heart Rhythm Association score (mEHRA) scores were calculated before and after the ablation.

Results: The average age of patients was 63±9 year old and 44 (27.9%) were female. Mean CHA2DS2 VASc score was 1.9±1.4, and moderate and severe left atrial (LA) dilation was present in 53 (36.1%) and 15 (10.2%) patients, respectively. After a follow-up of 3.7±1.0 years, 81 (54.7%) patients had an ATa recurrence and 35 (23.6%) patients underwent a repeat LA ablation. However, the mEHRA score significantly improved in 80.4% of the patients (p <0.001), with the median overall AFEQT score of 88.9 [70.4-97.2].

Conclusions: There is a considerable ATa recurrence rate after PVI of persistent AF at intermediate-term follow-up. However, our data indicate that PVI significantly improved AF-related symptoms and resulted in a high HRQoL for 2-5 years in patients with persistent AF.

Conflict of interest statement

D. Mol reports speaker/consultancy fee from Abbott. Dr. J.R. de Groot reports research grants through his institution from Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Daichi Sankyo, Johnson&Johnson, and Medtronic. In addition, he reports speaker/consultancy fees from Atricure, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier. Dr. de Jong reports consultancy fees from Medtronic, and speaker fees from Daiichi-Sankyo and Bayer. All the grants and fees received by the authors are outside the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1. Flowchart of patient selection process.
Fig 1. Flowchart of patient selection process.
Fig 2. Arrhythmia free survival analyses.
Fig 2. Arrhythmia free survival analyses.
A. Survival analysis of freedom of any atrial arrhythmia. B. Survival analysis of freedom of atrial fibrillation.
Fig 3. Arrhythmia free survival analyses.
Fig 3. Arrhythmia free survival analyses.
A. Survival analysis of freedom of atrial tachycardia. B. Survival analysis of freedom of any atrial arrhythmia after multiple ablations.
Fig 4. Type of atrial fibrillation per…
Fig 4. Type of atrial fibrillation per year of follow-up.
A. The type of atrial fibrillation (AF) reported for each follow-up year per patient. B. Overall AFEQT score per year. Of note, figure does not display repeated measurements.
Fig 5. Health-related quality-of-life and AF related…
Fig 5. Health-related quality-of-life and AF related symptoms.
A. mEHRA score before pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and at follow-up. The arrow thickness corresponds to the proportion of patients. B. Correlation between mEHRA score and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) score at follow-up.

References

    1. Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Piccini JP, Baloch KN, Monahan KH, et al.. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy on Quality of Life Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;321(13):1275–85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0692
    1. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, et al.. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;321(13):1261–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0693
    1. Blomström-Lundqvist C, Gizurarson S, Schwieler J, Jensen SM, Bergfeldt L, Kennebäck G, et al.. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Medication on Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPTAF Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;321(11):1059–68. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0335
    1. Ganesan AN, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, Kuklik P, Lau DH, Lim HS, et al.. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013;2(2):e004549. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.004549
    1. Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Deyell MW, Verma A, Macle L, et al.. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Assessed by Continuous Monitoring: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2019;140(22):1779–88. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042622
    1. Gupta DK, Shah AM, Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Antman EM, Grip LT, et al.. Left atrial structure and function in atrial fibrillation: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. European heart journal. 2014;35(22):1457–65. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht500
    1. Teh AW, Kistler PM, Lee G, Medi C, Heck PM, Spence SJ, et al.. Electroanatomic remodeling of the left atrium in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2012;23(3):232–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02178.x
    1. Van den Berg NWE, Makiri Kawasaki, Benedetta Fabrizi, Nariswari Fransisca A., Verduijn Arianne C., Neefs Jolien, et al.. Epicardial and endothelial cell activation concurs with extracellular matrix remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Clinical and Translational Medicine 2021. in press. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.558
    1. Krul SPJ, Berger WR, Smit NW, van Amersfoorth SCM, Driessen AHG, van Boven WJ, et al.. Atrial fibrosis and conduction slowing in the left atrial appendage of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgical pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2015;8(2):288–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001752
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al.. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European heart journal. 2020.
    1. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, et al.. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(19):1812–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288
    1. Boveda S, Metzner A, Nguyen DQ, Chun KRJ, Goehl K, Noelker G, et al.. Single-Procedure Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Improvement 12 Months Post-Cryoballoon Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF Trial. JACC Clinical electrophysiology. 2018;4(11):1440–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.007
    1. Pandya B, Sheikh A, Spagnola J, Bekheit S, Lafferty J, Kowalski M. Safety and efficacy of second-generation versus first-generation cryoballoons for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of current evidence. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2016;45(1):49–56. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0075-4
    1. Bordignon S, Furnkranz A, Perrotta L, Dugo D, Konstantinou A, Nowak B, et al.. High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2015;17(5):725–31. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu331
    1. Heeger CH, Subin B, Wissner E, Fink T, Mathew S, Maurer T, et al.. Second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: Lessons from a five-year follow-up. International journal of cardiology. 2020;312:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.062
    1. Akkaya E, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, Greiss H, Hamm CW, Sperzel J, et al.. Five-year outcome and predictors of success after second-generation cryoballoon ablation for treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. International journal of cardiology. 2018;266:106–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.069
    1. Akkaya E, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, Greiss H, Hamm CW, Sperzel J, et al.. Five-year experience with pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation cryoballoon for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2018;29(11):1500–7. doi: 10.1111/jce.13743
    1. Malmborg H, Lonnerholm S, Blomstrom P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety; the AF-COR study. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;15(11):1567–73.
    1. Tondo C, Iacopino S, Pieragnoli P, Molon G, Verlato R, Curnis A, et al.. Pulmonary vein isolation cryoablation for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes from the real-world multicenter observational project. Heart rhythm. 2018;15(3):363–8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.038
    1. Mörtsell D, Jansson V, Malmborg H, Lönnerholm S, Blomström-Lundqvist C. Clinical outcome of the 2nd generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation—A sub-study of the randomized trial evaluating single versus dual cryoballoon applications. International journal of cardiology. 2019;278:120–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.097
    1. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al.. Recommendations for chamber quantification. European journal of echocardiography: the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. 2006;7(2):79–108. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.12.014
    1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al.. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–70.
    1. Spertus J, Dorian P, Bubien R, Lewis S, Godejohn D, Reynolds MR, et al.. Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2011;4(1):15–25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.958033
    1. Wynn GJ, Todd DM, Webber M, Bonnett L, McShane J, Kirchhof P, et al.. The European Heart Rhythm Association symptom classification for atrial fibrillation: validation and improvement through a simple modification. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014;16(7):965–72. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut395
    1. Weerasooriya R, Khairy P, Litalien J, Macle L, Hocini M, Sacher F, et al.. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;57(2):160–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.061
    1. Tilz RR, Heeger CH, Wick A, Saguner AM, Metzner A, Rillig A, et al.. Ten-Year Clinical Outcome After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Utilizing the Hamburg Approach in Patients With Symptomatic Drug-Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2018;11(2):e005250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005250
    1. Neumann T, Wójcik M, Berkowitsch A, Erkapic D, Zaltsberg S, Greiss H, et al.. Cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 5-year outcome after single procedure and predictors of success. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;15(8):1143–9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut021
    1. Essebag V, Azizi Z, Alipour P, Khaykin Y, Leong-Sit P, Sarrazin JF, et al.. Relationship between quality of life and burden of recurrent atrial fibrillation following ablation: CAPCOST multicentre cohort study. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2020;22(7):1017–25. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa066
    1. Su WW, Reddy VY, Bhasin K, Champagne J, Sangrigoli RM, Braegelmann KM, et al.. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the multicenter STOP Persistent AF trial. Heart rhythm. 2020;17(11):1841–1847. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.020
    1. Driessen AHG, Berger WR, Bierhuizen MFA, Piersma FR, van den Berg NWE, Neefs J, et al.. Quality of life improves after thoracoscopic surgical ablation of advanced atrial fibrillation: Results of the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Autonomic Modulation via Thoracoscopic Surgery (AFACT) study. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2018;155(3):972–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.093

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe