High CPAP vs. NIPPV in preterm neonates - A physiological cross-over study

Amit Mukerji, Muzafar Gani Abdul Wahab, Abdul Razak, Emily Rempel, Waseemoddin Patel, Tapas Mondal, Jennifer Beck, Amit Mukerji, Muzafar Gani Abdul Wahab, Abdul Razak, Emily Rempel, Waseemoddin Patel, Tapas Mondal, Jennifer Beck

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the physiological impact of high CPAP (≥9 cmH2O) vs. NIPPV at equivalent mean airway pressures.

Study design: In this cross-over study, preterm neonates on high CPAP or NIPPV were placed on the alternate mode. After 30 min, left and right ventricular cardiac output and work of breathing indices were assessed, following which patients were placed back on the original mode and a similar procedure ensued.

Results: Fifteen infants with mean (SD) postmenstrual age 32.7 (3.0) weeks, and weight 1569 (564) grams were included. No differences in LVO [320 (63) vs. 331 (86) mL/kg/min, P = 0.46] or RVO [420 (135) vs. 437 (141) mL/kg/min, P = 0.19] were noted during high CPAP vs. NIPPV, along with no differences in work of breathing indices.

Conclusion: High CPAP pressures did not adversely impact cardiac output or work of breathing compared to NIPPV at equivalent mean airway pressure.

Conflict of interest statement

AM, MGAW, AR, ER, WP and TM have no potential competing interests to disclose. JB has made inventions related to neural control of mechanical ventilation that are patented. The patents are assigned to the academic institution(s) where inventions were made. The license for these patents belongs to Maquet Critical Care. Future commercial uses of this technology may provide financial benefit to Dr JB through royalties. Dr JB owns 50% of Neurovent Research Inc (NVR). NVR is a research and development company that builds the equipment and catheters for research studies. NVR has a consulting agreement with Maquet Critical Care.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1. Study schema depicting the crossover…
Fig. 1. Study schema depicting the crossover between high CPAP and NIPPV at equivalent MAP.
CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, MAP mean airway pressure, NIPPV non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.
Fig. 2. Cardiac Output on High CPAP…
Fig. 2. Cardiac Output on High CPAP vs. NIPPV.
A LVO estimates were 320 [63] vs. 331 [86] mL/kg/min, P = 0.46 during high CPAP and NIPPV, respectively. B RVO values were 420 (135) vs. 437 (141) mL/kg/min, P = 0.19 with high CPAP and NIPPV, respectively. CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, LVO left ventricular output, NIPPV nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, RVO right ventricular output.
Fig. 3. Peak and minimum Edi on…
Fig. 3. Peak and minimum Edi on High CPAP vs. NIPPV.
A Peak Edi values assessed during inhalation were 16.6 (8.6) vs. 14.2 (6.0) µV, P = 0.19 during high CPAP and NIPPV, respectively. B Minimum Edi values assessed in expiratory phase were 6.2 (3.0) vs. 5.4 (2.8) µV, P = 0.39 during high CPAP and NIPPV, respectively. CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, Edi electrical activity of diaphragm, NIPPV nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.

References

    1. Sammour I, Karnati S. Non-invasive respiratory support of the premature neonate: from physics to bench to practice. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:214. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00214.
    1. Mahmoud RA, Roehr CC, Schmalisch G. Current methods of non-invasive ventilatory support for neonates. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2011;12:196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2010.12.001.
    1. Diblasi RM. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the respiratory care of the newborn infant. Respir Care. 2009;54:1209–35.
    1. Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:Cd005384.
    1. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd003212.
    1. Owen LS, Manley BJ. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants: Equipment, evidence, and synchronization. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:146–53. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.003.
    1. Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S, Yee W, Read B, Minski J, et al. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:387–93.. doi: 10.1111/apa.13644.
    1. Hadj-Ahmed MA, Samson N, Nadeau C, Boudaa N, Praud JP. Laryngeal muscle activity during nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in nonsedated newborn lambs. Neonatology. 2015;107:199–205. doi: 10.1159/000369120.
    1. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG. Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F422–8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.205195.
    1. Gupta AK, Szynal A, Hallinan S, Keszler M. CPAP vs. Unsynchronized NIPPV at Equal Mean Airway Pressure (MAP) Pediatr Academic Societies. 2019;2851:442.
    1. Mukerji A, Wahab MGA, Mitra S, Mondal T, Paterson D, Beck J. High continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: a physiological study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54:1039–44. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24312.
    1. Buzzella B, Claure N, D’Ugard C, Bancalari E. A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.040.
    1. Stein H, Firestone K. Application of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:60–9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.09.005.
    1. Beck J, Reilly M, Grasselli G, Qui H, Slutsky AS, Dunn MS, et al. Characterization of neural breathing pattern in spontaneously breathing preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011;70:607–13. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318232100e.
    1. Hedstrom AB, Gove NE, Mayock DE, Batra M. Performance of the Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score in predicting PCO(2) and respiratory support in newborns: a prospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2018;38:505–11.. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0049-3.
    1. Abdel-Hady H, Matter M, Hammad A, El-Refaay A, Aly H. Hemodynamic changes during weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e1086–90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1193.
    1. Hsu HS, Chen W, Wang NK. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac output in neonates. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1996;37:353–6.
    1. Binmanee A, El Helou S, Shivananda S, Fusch C, Mukerji A. Use of high noninvasive respiratory support pressures in preterm neonates: a single-center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:2838–43.. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1265931.
    1. Weisz DE, Jain A, McNamara PJ, EL-Khuffash A. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography. Neonatology. 2012;102:61–7. doi: 10.1159/000337295.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe