Management of soft-tissue coverage of open tibia fractures in Latin America: Techniques, timing, and resources
Madeline C MacKechnie, Michael J Flores, Vincenzo Giordano, Michael J Terry, Mario Garuz, Nicolas Lee, Luis G Padilla Rojas, Michael A MacKechnie, Fernando Bidolegui, Kelsey Brown, Jose Eduardo Quintero, Anthony Ding, Carlos G Sanchez Valenciano, Horacio Tabares Neyra, Julio Segovia, Dino Aguilar, Esther Mm van Lieshout, Michael Hj Verhofstad, Theodore Miclau, Madeline C MacKechnie, Michael J Flores, Vincenzo Giordano, Michael J Terry, Mario Garuz, Nicolas Lee, Luis G Padilla Rojas, Michael A MacKechnie, Fernando Bidolegui, Kelsey Brown, Jose Eduardo Quintero, Anthony Ding, Carlos G Sanchez Valenciano, Horacio Tabares Neyra, Julio Segovia, Dino Aguilar, Esther Mm van Lieshout, Michael Hj Verhofstad, Theodore Miclau
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined soft-tissue coverage techniques of open tibia fractures, described soft-tissue treatment patterns across income groups, and determined resource accessibility and availability in Latin America.
Methods: A 36-question survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons in Latin America through two networks: national orthopaedic societies and the Asociación de Cirujanos Traumatólogos de las Américas (ACTUAR). Demographic information was collected, and responses were stratified by income groups: high-income countries (HICs) and middle-income countries (MICs).
Results: The survey was completed by 469 orthopaedic surgeons, representing 19 countries in Latin America (2 HICs and 17 MICs). Most respondents were male (89%), completed residency training (96%), and were fellowship-trained (71%). Only 44% of the respondents had received soft-tissue training. Respondents (77%) reported a strong interest in attending a soft-tissue training course. Plastic surgeons were more commonly the primary providers for Gustilo Anderson (GA) Type IIIB injuries in HICs than in MICs (100% vs. 47%, p<0.01) and plastic surgeons were more available (<24 h of patient presentation to the hospital) in HICs than MICs (63% vs. 26%, p = 0.05), demonstrating statistically significant differences. In addition, respondents in HICs performed free flaps more commonly than in MICs for proximal third (55% vs. 10%, p<0.01), middle third (36% vs. 9%, p = 0.02), and distal third (55% vs. 10%, p<0.01) lower extremity wounds. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT or Wound VAC) was the only resource available to more than half of the respondents. Though not statistically significant, surgeons reported having more access to plastic surgeons at their institutions in HICs than MICs (91% vs. 62%, p = 0.12) and performed microsurgical flaps more commonly at their respective institutions (73% vs. 42%, p = 0.06).
Conclusions: The study demonstrated that most orthopaedic surgeons in Latin America have received no soft-tissue training, HICs and MICs have differences in access to plastic surgeons and expectations for flap type and timing to definitive coverage, and most respondents had limited access to necessary soft-tissue surgical resources. Further investigation into differences in the clinical outcomes related to soft-tissue coverage methods and protocols can provide additional insight into the importance of timing and access to specialists.
Keywords: Flaps; Latin America; Open tibia fractures; Soft-tissue management; Wound coverage.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest No conflict of interest related to the research or manuscript for the listed authors.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed