Association of Laminar Airflow During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty With Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Qiaojie Wang, Chi Xu, Karan Goswami, Timothy L Tan, Javad Parvizi, Qiaojie Wang, Chi Xu, Karan Goswami, Timothy L Tan, Javad Parvizi

Abstract

Importance: Whether laminar airflow (LAF) in the operating room is effective for decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty remains a clinically important yet controversial issue.

Objective: To investigate the association between operating room LAF ventilation systems and the risk of PJI in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 6972 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty at 2 surgical facilities within a single institution from January 1, 2013, to September 15, 2017, with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. All procedures were performed by 5 board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2014, to September 15, 2018.

Exposure: Patients underwent total joint arthroplasty in operating rooms equipped with either LAF or turbulent airflow.

Main outcomes and measures: Patient characteristics were extracted from clinical records. Periprosthetic joint infection was defined according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria within 1 year of the index arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to explore the potential association between LAF and risk of PJI at 1 year, and then a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching was performed to further validate the findings.

Results: A total of 6972 patients (2797 who underwent total knee arthroplasty and 4175 who underwent total hip arthroplasty; 3690 women [52.9%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.7] years) were included. The incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients from the facility without LAF was similar to that of patients from the facility with LAF (0.4% [12 of 3027] vs 0.5% [21 of 3945]). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, after all confounding factors were taken into account, the use of LAF was not associated with a reduction of the risk of PJI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.40-2.19; P = .89). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty at these 2 sites.

Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that the use of LAF in the operating room was not associated with a reduced incidence of PJI after primary total joint arthroplasty. With an appropriate perioperative protocol for infection prevention, LAF does not seem to play a protective role in PJI prevention.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Parvizi reported receiving personal fees and consulting fees from Corentec; personal fees from Ethicon, Flexion, Heraeus, Jointstem, KCI/3M, MicroGenDx, Peptilogics, Tenor, Zimmer Biomet; and stocks or stock options from Acumed, Alphaeon, Ceribell, Hip Innovation Technology, Intellijoint, Joint Purification Systems, MDValuate, Molecular Surface Technologies, Nanooxygenic, arvizi Surgical Innovations and Subsidiaries, PRN-Veterinary, and Sonata outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8)(suppl):61-65. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022
    1. Cai J, Karam JA, Parvizi J, Smith EB, Sharkey PF. Aquacel surgical dressing reduces the rate of acute PJI following total joint arthroplasty: a case-control study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1098-1100. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.012
    1. Panahi P, Stroh M, Casper DS, Parvizi J, Austin MS. Operating room traffic is a major concern during total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2690-2694. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2252-4
    1. Merollini KMD, Zheng H, Graves N. Most relevant strategies for preventing surgical site infection after total hip arthroplasty: guideline recommendations and expert opinion. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(3):221-226. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.027
    1. Zheng H, Barnett AG, Merollini K, et al. . Control strategies to prevent total hip replacement–related infections: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e003978. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003978
    1. Parvizi J, Shohat N, Gehrke T. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection: new guidelines. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4)(suppl B):3-10. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1212.R1
    1. Charnley J, Eftekhar N. Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip-joint with special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating room. Br J Surg. 1969;56(9):641-649. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800560902
    1. Beldi G, Bisch-Knaden S, Banz V, Mühlemann K, Candinas D. Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections. Am J Surg. 2009;198(2):157-162. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.023
    1. Gastmeier P, Breier A-C, Brandt C. Influence of laminar airflow on prosthetic joint infections: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81(2):73-78. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.008
    1. Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285(6334):10-14. doi:10.1136/bmj.285.6334.10
    1. Birgand G, Toupet G, Rukly S, et al. . Air contamination for predicting wound contamination in clean surgery: a large multicenter study. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(5):516-521. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.026
    1. Erichsen Andersson A, Petzold M, Bergh I, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Nilsson K. Comparison between mixed and laminar airflow systems in operating rooms and the influence of human factors: experiences from a Swedish orthopedic center. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(6):665-669. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.02.001
    1. Rezapoor M, Alvand A, Jacek E, Paziuk T, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Operating room traffic increases aerosolized particles and compromises the air quality: a simulated study. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):851-855. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.012
    1. Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Gastmeier P. Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):553-561. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30059-2
    1. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C, Wyatt MC. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement?: the ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):85-90. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24862
    1. Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, Daschner F, Gastmeier P, Rüden H. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(5):695-700. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b757d
    1. World Health Organization Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection. Accessed August 9, 2018.
    1. Witso E. The rate of prosthetic joint infection is underestimated in the arthroplasty registers. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(3):277-278. doi:10.3109/17453674.2015.1042320
    1. Parvizi J, Gehrke T; International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection . Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1331. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009
    1. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083-3107. doi:10.1002/sim.3697
    1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Getting started. Accessed September 3, 2020.
    1. X&Y Solutions Inc EmpowerStats. Accessed September 3, 2020.
    1. Diab-Elschahawi M, Berger J, Blacky A, et al. . Impact of different-sized laminar air flow versus no laminar air flow on bacterial counts in the operating room during orthopedic surgery. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(7):e25-e29. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.035
    1. Tayton ER, Frampton C, Hooper GJ, Young SW. The impact of patient and surgical factors on the rate of infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 64,566 joints from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(3):334-340. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36775
    1. Lowbury EJ, Lidwell OM. Multi-hospital trial on the use of ultraclean air systems in orthopaedic operating rooms to reduce infection: preliminary communication. J R Soc Med. 1978;71(11):800-806. doi:10.1177/014107687807101106
    1. Holton J, Ridgway GL. Commissioning operating theatres. J Hosp Infect. 1993;23(2):153-160. doi:10.1016/0195-6701(93)90019-V
    1. Whyte W, Hodgson R, Tinkler J. The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. J Hosp Infect. 1982;3(2):123-135. doi:10.1016/0195-6701(82)90004-4
    1. Yang L, Huang C-Y, Zhou Z-B, et al. . Risk factors for hypothermia in patients under general anesthesia: is there a drawback of laminar airflow operating rooms? a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;21:14-17. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.079
    1. Madhavan P, Blom A, Karagkevrakis B, Pradeep M, Huma H, Newman JH. Deterioration of theatre discipline during total joint replacement—have theatre protocols been abandoned? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):262-265.
    1. de Korne DF, van Wijngaarden JDH, van Rooij J, Wauben LSGL, Hiddema UF, Klazinga NS. Safety by design: effects of operating room floor marking on the position of surgical devices to promote clean air flow compliance and minimise infection risks. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(9):746-752. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000138
    1. Aalirezaie A, Akkaya M, Barnes CL, et al. . General assembly, prevention, operating room environment: proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(2S):S105-S115. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.060

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe