Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Manuel Caitano Maia, Allan A Lima Pereira, Liana Valente Lage, Natalia Moreno Fraile, Victor Van Vaisberg, Guilherme Kudo, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Diogo Assed Bastos, Carlos Dzik, Manuel Caitano Maia, Allan A Lima Pereira, Liana Valente Lage, Natalia Moreno Fraile, Victor Van Vaisberg, Guilherme Kudo, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Diogo Assed Bastos, Carlos Dzik

Abstract

Purpose: Limited data are available about the tolerability and clinical outcomes of elderly patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who are treated with docetaxel. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRPC who were treated in our institution.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified patients with mCRPC and a Karnosfky performance status of 60% or greater treated with docetaxel on any schedule as first-line chemotherapy between 2008 and 2013. The primary end point was a comparison of median overall survival (OS) according to age in this population. Secondary end points were comparisons of the rates of severe toxicities, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of 50% or greater, and time to progression (TTP). Results were stratified by three age groups: younger than 65 years, 65 to 74 years, and 75 years or older.

Results: Among the 197 patients included, 68 (34%) were younger than 65 years, 85 (43%) were 65 to 74 years, and 44 (22%) were 75 years or older. The mean number of comorbidities was not different among groups (1.19 v 1.32 v 1.43; P = .54). Patients younger than 65 years received a higher cumulative dose of docetaxel (450 mg/m2 v 382 mg/m2 v 300 mg/m2; P = .004). The rates of PSA decline of 50% or greater (41% v 47% v 36.4%; P = .51) and the median TTP (5.13 v 5.13 v 4.7 months; P = .15) were comparable among all groups. The median OS was longer in the group of patients younger than age 65 years (19.6 v 12.4 v 12.3 months; P = .012). Rates of any grade 3 or higher adverse event were not different among groups (63.2% v 71.8% v 54.5%; P = .14).

Conclusion: Administration of docetaxel in elderly patients who had good performance status was well tolerated. Rates of PSA decline and TTP were similar to those of younger patients, but median survival was lower.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow chart. A total of 280 patients were identified initially; 83 were excluded on the basis of exclusion criteria (inpatients when received chemotherapy [n = 7]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 2 [n = 24]; received a previous chemotherapy regimen [n = 17]; received docetaxel as part of a study protocol [n = 10]; another concomitant primary tumor [n = 3]; received docetaxel combined with carboplatin [n = 2]; did not receive any chemotherapy [n = 4]; received the treatment at another institution [n = 1]; or did not have enough information on charts [n = 12]). KPS, Karnofsky performance status.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Time-to-treatment progression according to age group. HR, hazard ratio.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival according to age groups. HR, hazard ratio.
Fig A1
Fig A1
Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival of the whole cohort (15.6 months).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386.
    1. Eisenberger MA, Walsh PC. Early androgen deprivation for prostate cancer? N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1837–1838.
    1. Sweeney CJ, Chen Y-H, Carducci M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:737–746.
    1. James ND, Sydes MR, Clarke NW, et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): Survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1163–1177.
    1. Vale CL, Burdett S, Rydzewska LHM, et al: Addition of docetaxel or bisphosphonates to standard of care in men with localised or metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses of aggregate data. Lancet Oncol 17:243-256, 2015.
    1. Daniel PP, Catherine MT, Hussain MHA, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;173:457–457.
    1. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al: Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. New Engl J Med 351:1502-1512, 2004.
    1. Droz J-P, Aapro M, Balducci L, et al. Management of prostate cancer in older patients: Updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e404–e414.
    1. Horgan AM, Seruga B, Pond GR, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of docetaxel in older men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the TAX 327 trial. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014;5:119–126.
    1. Fosså SD, Jacobsen A-B, Ginman C, et al. Weekly docetaxel and prednisolone versus prednisolone alone in androgen-independent prostate cancer: A randomized phase II study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1691–1698.
    1. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, et al. Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1383–1389.
    1. Bellmunt J. Chemotherapy for prostate cancer in senior adults: Are we treating the elderly or the frail? Eur Urol. 2009;55:1310–1312.
    1. Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: Updated survival in the TAX 327 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:242–245.
    1. Italiano A, Ortholan C, Oudard S, et al. Docetaxel-based chemotherapy in elderly patients (age 75 and older) with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1368–1375.
    1. Shigeta K, Kosaka T, Yazawa S, et al. Predictive factors for severe and febrile neutropenia during docetaxel chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:605–612.
    1. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2595–2603.
    1. Veccia A, Caffo O, Giorgi UD, et al: Clinical outcomes in octogenarians treated with docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Future Oncol 12:493-502, 2016.
    1. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: A prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3457–3465.
    1. Takaha N, Okihara K, Kamoi K, et al. Feasibility of tri-weekly docetaxel-based chemotherapy for elderly patients (age 75 and older) with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Urol Int. 2011;87:263–269.
    1. Beer TM, Berry W, Wersinger EM, et al. Weekly docetaxel in elderly patients with prostate cancer: Efficacy and toxicity in patients at least 70 years of age compared with patients younger than 70 years. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2003;2:167–172.
    1. Templeton AJ, Vera-Badillo FE, Wang L, et al: Translating clinical trials to clinical practice: Outcomes of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and prednisone in and out of clinical trials. Ann Oncol 24:2972-2977, 2013.
    1. Anderson J, Van Poppel H, Bellmunt J, et al. Chemotherapy for older patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007;99:269–273.
    1. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L, Harmenberg U, Joensuu T, et al. 2-Weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel to treat castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer: A randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:117–124.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe