The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions

Lucy Yardley, Leanne Morrison, Katherine Bradbury, Ingrid Muller, Lucy Yardley, Leanne Morrison, Katherine Bradbury, Ingrid Muller

Abstract

This paper describes an approach that we have evolved for developing successful digital interventions to help people manage their health or illness. We refer to this as the "person-based" approach to highlight the focus on understanding and accommodating the perspectives of the people who will use the intervention. While all intervention designers seek to elicit and incorporate the views of target users in a variety of ways, the person-based approach offers a distinctive and systematic means of addressing the user experience of intended behavior change techniques in particular and can enhance the use of theory-based and evidence-based approaches to intervention development. There are two key elements to the person-based approach. The first is a developmental process involving qualitative research with a wide range of people from the target user populations, carried out at every stage of intervention development, from planning to feasibility testing and implementation. This process goes beyond assessing acceptability, usability, and satisfaction, allowing the intervention designers to build a deep understanding of the psychosocial context of users and their views of the behavioral elements of the intervention. Insights from this process can be used to anticipate and interpret intervention usage and outcomes, and most importantly to modify the intervention to make it more persuasive, feasible, and relevant to users. The second element of the person-based approach is to identify "guiding principles" that can inspire and inform the intervention development by highlighting the distinctive ways that the intervention will address key context-specific behavioral issues. This paper describes how to implement the person-based approach, illustrating the process with examples of the insights gained from our experience of carrying out over a thousand interviews with users, while developing public health and illness management interventions that have proven effective in trials involving tens of thousands of users.

Keywords: Internet; behavior change.; evaluation studies; feasibility studies; health promotion; patient education; person-based approach; professional education; qualitative research.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Pagliari C. Design and evaluation in eHealth: challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15.
    1. Baker TB, Gustafson DH, Shah D. How can research keep up with eHealth? Ten strategies for increasing the timeliness and usefulness of eHealth research. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2925.
    1. van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, Seydel ER. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672.
    1. Kohl LF, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2665.
    1. Schneider F, van Osch L. de Vries H: Identifying Factors for Optimal Development of Health-Related Websites: A Delphi Study Among Experts and Potential Future Users. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1863.
    1. Van Velsen L, Wentzel J, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development Approach. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2547.
    1. Yen PY, Bakken S. Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(3):413–22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000020.
    1. Iivari J, Isomäki H. Pekkola S: The user - the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Information Systems Journal. 2010;20:109–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00336.
    1. Yardley L, Morrison LG, Andreou P, Joseph J, Little P. Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-52.
    1. Ware LJ, Williams S, Bradbury K, Brant C, Little P, Hobbs FD, Yardley L. Exploring weight loss services in primary care and staff views on using a web-based programme. Inform Prim Care. 2012;20(4):283–8.
    1. Yardley L, Williams S, Bradbury K, Garip G, Renouf S, Ware L, Dorling H, Smith E, Little P. Integrating user perspectives into the development of a web-based weight management intervention. Clinical Obesity. 2012;2:132–141. doi: 10.1111/cob.12001.
    1. Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, Douglas E, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Krawczyk J, Llor C, Cals JW, Francis NA, Yardley L, Coenen S, Verheij T, Goossens H, Little P, GRACE INTRO study team General practitioners' views on the acceptability and applicability of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in multiple European countries: a qualitative study prior to a randomised trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-101.
    1. Yardley L, Miller S, Teasdale E, Little P, Primit Team Using mixed methods to design a web-based behavioural intervention to reduce transmission of colds and flu. J Health Psychol. 2011 Mar;16(2):353–64. doi: 10.1177/1359105310377538.
    1. McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M, eCRT Research Team Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-90.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583.
    1. Nyman SR, Yardley L. Usability and acceptability of a website that provides tailored advice on falls prevention activities for older people. Health Informatics J. 2009 Mar;15(1):27–39. doi: 10.1177/1460458208099866.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Lloyd S, Phillips D, Stuart B, Williams S, Bradbury K, Roderick P, Murray E, Michie S, Little P, Yardley L. Does brief telephone support improve engagement with a web-based weight management intervention? Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3199.
    1. Yardley L, Ware LJ, Smith ER, Williams S, Bradbury KJ, Arden-Close EJ, Mullee MA, Moore MV, Peacock JL, Lean ME, Margetts BM, Byrne CD, Hobbs RF, Little P. Randomised controlled feasibility trial of a web-based weight management intervention with nurse support for obese patients in primary care. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:67. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-67.
    1. Little P, Stuart B, Francis N, Douglas E, Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S, Cals JW, Melbye H, Santer M, Moore M, Coenen S, Butler C, Hood K, Kelly M, Godycki-Cwirko M, Mierzecki A, Torres A, Llor C, Davies M, Mullee M, O'Reilly G, van der Velden A, Geraghty AW, Goossens H, Verheij T, Yardley L. Effects of internet-based training on antibiotic prescribing rates for acute respiratory-tract infections: a multinational, cluster, randomised, factorial, controlled trial. The Lancet. 2013 Oct;382(9899):1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60994-0.
    1. Yardley L, Douglas E, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, O'Reilly G, Stuart B, Geraghty AW, Arden-Close E, van der Velden AW, Goosens H, Verheij TJ, Butler CC, Francis NA, Little P, GRACE consortium Evaluation of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for LRTI in six European countries: quantitative process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2013;8:134. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-134.
    1. Yardley L, Miller S, Schlotz W, Little P. Evaluation of a Web-based intervention to promote hand hygiene: exploratory randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1963.
    1. Yardley L, Joseph J, Michie S, Weal M, Wills G, Little P. Evaluation of a Web-based intervention providing tailored advice for self-management of minor respiratory symptoms: exploratory randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1599.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337(sep29 1):a1655–a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Kok G, Schaalma H. Using theory in psychological interventions. In: Michie S, Abraham C, editors. Health psychology in practice. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. pp. 203–209.
    1. Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Montague E, Burns MN, Rashidi P. The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3077.
    1. Ritterband LM, Borowitz S, Cox DJ, Kovatchev B, Walker LS, Lucas V, Sutphen J. Using the internet to provide information prescriptions. Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e643–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0404.
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379–87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
    1. Rogers CR. On becoming a person: a therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1995.
    1. Munthe C, Sandman L, Cutas D. Person centred care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public health and research. Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep;20(3):231–49. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0183-y.
    1. Arden-Close E, Teasdale E, Tonkin-Crine S, Pitre N, Stafford-Watson M, Gibson D, Bruton A, Thomas M, Yardley L. Patients' perceptions of the potential of breathing training for asthma: a qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):449–53. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092.
    1. Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1286.
    1. Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. Rethinking Communication in the E-health Era. J Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):7–23. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001426.
    1. Lin H-X, Choong Y-Y, Salvendy G. A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems. Behaviour & Information Technology. 1997 Jan;16(4-5):267–277. doi: 10.1080/014492997119833.
    1. Cummins CO, Prochaska JO, Driskell MM, Evers KE, Wright JA, Prochaska JM, Velicer WF. Development of review criteria to evaluate health behavior change websites. J Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):55–62. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001434.
    1. Muylle S, Moenaert R, Despontin M. The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information & Management. 2004 May;41(5):543–560. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00089-2.
    1. O'Brien HL, Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2008 Apr;59(6):938–955. doi: 10.1002/asi.20801.
    1. Shah SG, Robinson I, AlShawi S. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Oct;25(4):514–21. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990328.
    1. Vermeulen J, Verwey R, Hochstenbach LM, van der Weegen S, Man YP, de Witte LP. Experiences of multidisciplinary development team members during user-centered design of telecare products and services: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(5):e124. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3195.
    1. Zhang J. Human-centered computing in health information systems. Part 1: analysis and design. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.002.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583.
    1. Garip G, Yardley L. A synthesis of qualitative research on overweight and obese people's views and experiences of weight management. Clinical Obesity. 2011;1(2):110. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00021.x.
    1. Tonkin-Crine S, Yardley L, Coenen S, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Krawczyk J, Touboul P, Verheij T, Little P. GPs' views in five European countries of interventions to promote prudent antibiotic use. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):e252–61. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X572445.
    1. Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S, Francis NA, Brugman C, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Krawczyk J, Llor C, Yardley L, Coenen S, Godycki-Cwirko M, Butler CC, Verheij TJ, Goossens H, Little P, Cals JW, GRACE INTRO team Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014;24:14026. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.26.
    1. Little P, Stuart B, Francis N, Douglas E, Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S, Cals JW, Melbye H, Santer M, Moore M, Coenen S, Butler C, Hood K, Kelly M, Godycki-Cwirko M, Mierzecki A, Torres A, Llor C, Davies M, Mullee M, O'Reilly G, van der Velden A, Geraghty AW, Goossens H, Verheij T, Yardley L. Effects of internet-based training on antibiotic prescribing rates for acute respiratory-tract infections: a multinational, cluster, randomised, factorial, controlled trial. The Lancet. 2013 Oct;382(9899):1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60994-0.
    1. Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007 Jan 01;1(1):77–100. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430.
    1. Yardley L, Bishop F. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. In: Willig C, Stainton-Rogers W, editors. Qualitative research in psychology. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007. pp. 313–326.
    1. Yardley L, Bishop FL, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen GIJM, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd CJ, Cuttelod T, Horne M, Lanta K, Holt AR. Older People's Views of Falls-Prevention Interventions in Six European Countries. The Gerontologist. 2006 Oct 01;46(5):650–660. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.5.650.
    1. Yardley L, Donovan-Hall M, Francis K, Todd C. Older people's views about falls prevention: a qualitative study. Health Education Research. 2006;21:508–517. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh077.
    1. Yardley L, Nyman SR. Internet provision of tailored advice on falls prevention activities for older people: a randomized controlled evaluation. Health Promot Int. 2007 Jun;22(2):122–8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam007.
    1. Van Velsen L, Wentzel J, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development Approach. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2547.
    1. Van den Haak MJ, De Jong MD, Schellens PJ. Evaluation of an informational Web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared. Technical Communication. 2007;54(1):58–71.
    1. McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M, eCRT Research Team Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-90.
    1. Branch JL. Investigating the Information-Seeking Processes of Adolescents: The Value of Using Think Alouds and Think Afters. Library & Information Science Research. 2000 Nov;22(4):371–392. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00051-7.
    1. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. MRC Population Health Science Research Network; 2014; London. 2014.
    1. Santer M, Muller I, Yardley L, Burgess H, Selinger H, Stuart Bl, Little P. Supporting self-care for families of children with eczema with a Web-based intervention plus health care professional support: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3035.
    1. Schueller SM, Munoz RF, Mohr DC. Realizing the Potential of Behavioral Intervention Technologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2013 Dec 03;22(6):478–483. doi: 10.1177/0963721413495872.
    1. Williams S, Yardley L, Weal M, Willis G. Introduction to Lifeguide: Open-source software for Creating Online Interventions for Health Care. Global Telemedicine and eHealth Updates: Knowledge Resources; Medetel: Global Telemedicine and eHealth Updates; 2010; Luxembourg, LU. 2010.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000 Oct;11(4):227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78.
    1. Ryan RM, Patrick H, Deci EL, Williams GC. Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on Self-Determination Theory. European Health Psychologist. 2008;10:2.
    1. Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR. Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J Pers. 1994 Mar;62(1):119–42.
    1. Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1–7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.
    1. Schwarz B. Self-determination:The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist. 2000;55(1):79. doi: 10.1037//003-066X.55.1.79.
    1. Crutzen R, Cyr D, de Vries NK. The role of user control in adherence to and knowledge gained from a website: randomized comparison between a tunneled version and a freedom-of-choice version. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):e45. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1922.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman; 1994.
    1. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006;38:69–119. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1.
    1. Crutzen R, Ruiter RA, de Vries NK. Can interest and enjoyment help to increase use of Internet-delivered interventions? Psychol Health. 2014;29(11):1227–44. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.921300.
    1. West R. Theory of addiction. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2006.
    1. Morrison LG, Yardley L, Powell J, Michie S. What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Mar;18(2):137–44. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0062.
    1. Morrison L, Moss-Morris R, Michie S, Yardley L. Optimizing engagement with Internet-based health behaviour change interventions: comparison of self-assessment with and without tailored feedback using a mixed methods approach. Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;19(4):839–55. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12083.
    1. Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, Johnston M, MacLennan G, Araújo-Soares V. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychology Review. 2012 Mar;6(1):7–32. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.513298.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690–701. doi: 10.1037/a0016136.
    1. Maher T. Plain English. 2014. [2014-11-07].
    1. Rotondi AJ, Sinkule J, Haas GL, Spring MB, Litschge CM, Newhill CE, Ganguli R, Anderson CM. Designing websites for persons with cognitive deficits: Design and usability of a psychoeducational intervention for persons with severe mental illness. Psychological Services. 2007;4(3):202–224. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.4.3.202.
    1. Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. New Riders; 2005. [2014-11-07]. .
    1. US Dept of Health and Human Services Usability. 2014. [2014-11-07]. .
    1. Fogg BJ, Swani P, Treinen M, Marshall J, Laraki O, Osipovich A, Shon J. What makes Web sites credible?. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; 2001; Chicago. 2001.
    1. Fogg B, Swani P, Treinen M, Marshall J, Osipovich A, Varma C. Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM Press; 2000. Elements that affect web credibility; p. 287.
    1. Harris PR, Sillence E, Briggs P. Perceived threat and corroboration: key factors that improve a predictive model of trust in internet-based health information and advice. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1821.
    1. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris P, Fishwick L. A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2006 Aug;64(8):697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.007.
    1. Sillence E, Briggs P, Fishwick L, Harris P. Guidelines for developing trust in health websites. 14th International Conference on World Wide Web; May 10-14, 2005; Chiba, Japan. 2005.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe