Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan

Amer Mahmoud Sindiani, Nail Obeidat, Eman Alshdaifat, Lina Elsalem, Mustafa M Alwani, Hasan Rawashdeh, Ahmad S Fares, Tamara Alalawne, Loai Issa Tawalbeh, Amer Mahmoud Sindiani, Nail Obeidat, Eman Alshdaifat, Lina Elsalem, Mustafa M Alwani, Hasan Rawashdeh, Ahmad S Fares, Tamara Alalawne, Loai Issa Tawalbeh

Abstract

Introduction: In the spot of the new emerging COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact worldwide on day-to-day activities many rules had to be changed in order to fight this pandemic. Lockdown started in Jordan and around the globe affecting several aspects of life including economy, education, entertainment, and government policies. Regarding education, the priority was to ensure the safety and progress of the educational process. Thus, new methods of teaching had to be applied using the online learning at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Faculty of Medicine. This study was done to assess (1) Class Experience (2) Students and Lecturers' Interaction (3) Online Learning Advantages & Disadvantages (4) Students' Preference.

Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted Convenience sampling technique was used to collect the data from the participants using a survey composed of 18 questions on Google Forms platform. A link was sent to the undergraduate medical students at the Jordan University of Science & Technology via their e-learning accounts (n = 3700). The form was available from May 22nd, 2020 to May 30th, 2020 for 8 days long. Data analysis was done using SPSS V 23.

Results: 2212 out of 3700 students responded, (55.8%) of them were in the basic years and (44.2%) of them were in the clinical years. (55.8%) of students started to take online lectures after 3 weeks. (45.7%) used the hybrid teaching method (asynchronous and synchronous), (31.4%) used live classes, and 22.8% recorded classes. Zoom was the most used platform. (48.7%) and (57%) of clinical students and basic students express their interaction as bad, while the others had good and excellent interaction. Maintaining social distance was the most advantage of online teaching, while poor technical setup and no direct contact were the most disadvantage, furthermore inability to have real clinical access was a significant problem for clinical students (p < .001). With reference to students' preferences 75% of students were not pleased with their experience and 42% of students prefer to integrate online learning with traditional learning.

Conclusion: Most medical students at JUST preferred the traditional face-to-face teaching method over the solo online teaching methods with recommendations to convert to a more integrated educational system. Also, a well-established infrastructure should be done in involving online teaching.

Keywords: Covid-19; Jordan; Medical students; Online learning.

Conflict of interest statement

No Conflict of interest.

© 2020 The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Live classes platforms.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Asynchronous classes materials.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The preventive cause to attent online classes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Student-lecturer interaction (live classes).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Student-lecturer interaction (asynchronous classes).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Student-lecturer interaction.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Experience satisfaction.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Do you prefer online learning method than classroom traditional learning?.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Keep using Online Learning alone.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Use more Integrated System.

References

    1. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) – World Health Organization Accessed 26 June 2020.
    1. Hellewell J., Abbott S., Gimma A. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(4):e488–e496. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7.
    1. COVID-19 Map, Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Published 2020.
    1. National Defense Law Jordan prime ministry. Accessed 20 June 2020.
    1. Coronavirus Disease Ministry of health. Accessed 20 June 2020.
    1. Microsoft Teams . Published 2017.
    1. Meet Google. . Published 2017.
    1. 100 Essential E-Learning Statistics for 2020 . Published 2020.
    1. Coronavirus communications . Published 2020.
    1. Keane S. Zoom Chalks up 300 Million Daily Participants Despite Security Issues, CNET. Published 2020.
    1. Hamilton L., Suda K., Heidel R. The role of online learning in pharmacy education: a nationwide survey of student pharmacists. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(6):614–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.026.
    1. Margolis Amanda R., Porter Andrea L., Pitterle Michael E. Best practices for use of blended learning. Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ. 2017;81(3):49. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81349.
    1. Deming D., Goldin C., Katz L. Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? Am. Econ. Rev. 2015;105(5):496–501. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20151024.
    1. Pei L., Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Educ. Online. 2019;24(1):1666538. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
    1. Freeze R., Alshare K., Lane P. IS success model in E-learning context based on students' perceptions. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2010;21(2):173–184.
    1. Friedman C.P., Donaldson K.M., Vantsevich A.V. Educating medical students in the era of ubiquitous information. Med. Teach. 2016;38(5):504–509. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150990.
    1. Okuda Y., Bryson E., DeMaria S. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2009;76(4):330–343. doi: 10.1002/msj.20127.
    1. Kogan M., Klein S., Hannon C., Nolte M. Orthopaedic education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2020;28(11):e456–e464. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00292.
    1. Sandhu P., de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum. Med. Educ. Online. 2020;25(1):1764740. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1764740.
    1. Kay D., Pasarica M. Using technology to increase student (and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2019;43(3):408–413. doi: 10.1152/advan.00033.2019.
    1. Agha R., Abdall-Razak A., Crossley E. STROCSS 2019 Guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int. J. Surg. 2019;72:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe