Assessing the Theory of Gender and Power: HIV Risk Among Heterosexual Minority Dyads

Deborah J Rinehart, Alia A Al-Tayyib, Catlainn Sionean, Nancy Rumbaugh Whitesell, Susan Dreisbach, Sheana Bull, Deborah J Rinehart, Alia A Al-Tayyib, Catlainn Sionean, Nancy Rumbaugh Whitesell, Susan Dreisbach, Sheana Bull

Abstract

This study drew on the Theory of Gender and Power (TGP) as a framework to assess power inequalities within heterosexual dyads and their effects on women. Structural equation modeling was used to better understand the relationship between structural and interpersonal power and HIV sexual risk within African American and Latina women's heterosexual dyads. The main outcome variable was women's sexual HIV risk in the dyad and was created using women's reports of condomless sex with their main male partners and partners' reports of their HIV risk behaviors. Theoretical associations developed a priori yielded a well-fitting model that explained almost a quarter of the variance in women's sexual HIV risk in main partner dyads. Women's and partner structural power were indirectly associated with women's sexual HIV risk through substance use and interpersonal power. Interpersonal power was directly associated with risk. In addition, this study found that not identifying as heterosexual was directly and indirectly associated with women's heterosexual sex risk. This study provides further support for the utility of the TGP and the relevance of gender-related power dynamics for HIV prevention among heterosexually-active women.

Keywords: HIV risk; Sexually transmitted infections (STI); Structural equation modeling (SEM); Theory of gender and power.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A priori model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Final dyad model (N = 522): significant standardized direct path coefficients and factor loadings *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe