Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care

Abstract

Computerized drug prescribing alerts can improve patient safety, but are often overridden because of poor specificity and alert overload. Our objective was to improve clinician acceptance of drug alerts by designing a selective set of drug alerts for the ambulatory care setting and minimizing workflow disruptions by designating only critical to high-severity alerts to be interruptive to clinician workflow. The alerts were presented to clinicians using computerized prescribing within an electronic medical record in 31 Boston-area practices. There were 18,115 drug alerts generated during our six-month study period. Of these, 12,933 (71%) were noninterruptive and 5,182 (29%) interruptive. Of the 5,182 interruptive alerts, 67% were accepted. Reasons for overrides varied for each drug alert category and provided potentially useful information for future alert improvement. These data suggest that it is possible to design computerized prescribing decision support with high rates of alert recommendation acceptance by clinicians.

Figures

Figure 1.

Example of an interruptive Level 1 drug-drug contraindication alert presented to a clinician ordering erythromycin when diltiazem is already on the patient's medication list. Alert requires the clinician to cancel or modify order before continuing with prescription.

Figure 2.

Example of an interruptive Level 2 duplicate drug class alert presented to a clinician ordering diazepam when lorazepam is already on the patient's medication list. Alert requires clinician to cancel order or provide override reason before continuing with prescription.

Figure 3.

Example of a noninterruptive Level 3 drug-drug contraindication alert presented to a clinician ordering levofloxacin when warfarin is already on patient's medication list. Alert is presented in red letters in upper left-hand corner of screen for clinician's viewing. No additional action required before prescription completion.