Flexible Ureteroscopy Can Be More Efficacious in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones in Select Patients

Erdal Alkan, Ali Sarıbacak, Ahmet Oguz Ozkanli, Mehmet Murad Basar, Oguz Acar, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Erdal Alkan, Ali Sarıbacak, Ahmet Oguz Ozkanli, Mehmet Murad Basar, Oguz Acar, Mevlana Derya Balbay

Abstract

Purpose. We aimed to compare and evaluate the outcomes and complications of two endoscopic treatment procedures, semirigid ureteroscopy (SR-URS) and flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS), in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones (PUS). Methods. SR-URS (group 1) was done on 68 patients whereas 64 patients underwent F-URS (group 2) for the treatment of PUS. Success rate was defined as the absence of stone fragments or presence of asymptomatic insignificant residual fragments < 2 mm. Outcomes and complications were recorded. Results. The differences were statistically not significant in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and stone characteristics between groups. Mean ureteral stone size was 9.1 ± 0.4 mm and 8.9 ± 0.5 mm for groups 1 and 2. Mean operative time was 34.1 ± 1.5 min and 49.4 ± 2.3 min for groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.001). SFRs were 76.5% and 87.5% for groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.078). Two major complications (ureteral avulsion and ureteral rupture) occurred in group 1. Conclusion. F-URS is safer and less invasive than SR-URS in patients with PUS. There is no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of either technique. Nonetheless we recommend F-URS in the management of PUS as a first-line treatment option in select cases of proximal ureteral calculi.

References

    1. Türk C., Knoll T., Petrik A., Sarica K., Straub M., Seitz C. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. EAU; 2014. .
    1. Lee Y.-H., Tsai J.-Y., Jiaan B.-P., Wu T., Yu C.-C. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology. 2006;67(3):480–484. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.067.
    1. Nabi G., Downey P., Keeley F., Watson G., McClinton S. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;24(1)CD006029
    1. Fang Y.-Q., Qiu J.-G., Wang D.-J., Zhan H.-L., Situ J. Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2012;27(3):266–270. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502012000300011.
    1. Ozturk U., Şener N. C., Goktug H. N., Gucuk A., Nalbant I., Imamoglu M. A. The comparison of laparoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large proximal ureteral stones. Journal of the Canadian Urological Association. 2013;7(11-12):E673–E676. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.346.
    1. Liu Y., Zhou Z., Xia A., Dai H., Guo L., Zheng J. Clinical observation of different minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;29(6):1358–1362. doi: 10.12669/pjms.296.3910.
    1. Karadag M. A., Demir A., Cecen K., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients. Urology Journal. 2014;11(5):1867–1872.
    1. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Wolf J. S., Jr. Treatment selection and outcomes: Ureteral calculi. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2007;34(3):421–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.010.
    1. Morse R. M., Resnick M. I. Ureteral calculi: natural history and treatment in an era of advanced technology. Journal of Urology. 1991;145(2):263–265.
    1. Nikoobakht M. R., Emamzadeh A., Abedi A. R., Moradi K., Mehrsai A. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study. Urology Journal. 2007;4(4):207–211.
    1. Abe T., Akakura K., Kawaguchi M., et al. Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution. Journal of Endourology. 2005;19(7):768–773. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.768.
    1. Moufid K., Abbaka N., Touiti D., Adermouch L., Amine M., Lezrek M. Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position. Urology Annals. 2013;5(3):140–146. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.115729.
    1. Zhu H., Ye X., Xiao X., Chen X., Zhang Q., Wang H. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study. Journal of Endourology. 2014;28(1):100–103. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0391.
    1. Liu D.-Y., He H.-C., Wang J., et al. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium laser for 187 patients with proximal ureteral stones. Chinese Medical Journal. 2012;125(9):1542–1546. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.09.004.
    1. Chow G. K., Blute M. L., Patterson D. E., Segura J. W. Ureteroscopy: update on current practice and long term complications. The Journal of Urology. 2001;165(2):p. 71.
    1. Yencilek F., Sarica K., Erturhan S., Yagci F., Erbagci A. Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop? Urologia Internationalis. 2010;84(3):260–264. doi: 10.1159/000288225.
    1. Shigemura K., Yasufuku T., Yamashita M., Arakawa S., Fujisawa M. Efficacy of combining flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for transurethral lithotripsy. Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences. 2010;56(1):E24–E28.
    1. Geavlete P., Georgescu D., Nita G., Mirciulescu V., Cauni V. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. Journal of Endourology. 2006;20(3):179–185. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.179.
    1. Youssef R. F., El-Nahas A. R., El-Assmy A. M., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study. Urology. 2009;73(6):1184–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064.
    1. Traxer O., Dubosq F., Jamali K., Gattegno B., Thibault P. New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology. 2006;68(2):276–279. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.043.
    1. Gurbuz C., Atiş G., Arikan O., et al. The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(2):155–158. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0628-x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe