Antimicrobial Stewardship for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care (the ASPIC trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Arnaud Foucrier, Antoine Roquilly, Delphine Bachelet, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Adrien Bougle, Jean-François Timsit, Philippe Montravers, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Philippine Eloy, Emmanuel Weiss, ASPIC study group, Arnaud Foucrier, Antoine Roquilly, Delphine Bachelet, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Adrien Bougle, Jean-François Timsit, Philippe Montravers, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Philippine Eloy, Emmanuel Weiss, ASPIC study group

Abstract

Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains the leading cause of infections treated in the intensive care units (ICU). In a personalised care approach, we hypothesise that the duration of treatment of VAP can be reduced in function of the response to treatment.

Methods and analysis: The Antimicrobial Stewardship for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care (ASPIC) trial is a pragmatic national multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority, comparative randomised (1:1) single-blinded clinical trial. Five hundred and ninety adult patients hospitalised in 24 French ICU with a microbiologically confirmed first episode of VAP that received appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy will be included. They will be randomly allocated to standard management with duration of appropriate antibiotic fixed for 7 days according to international guidelines or antimicrobial stewardship based on daily clinical assessment of clinical cure. The assessment of clinical cure will be repeated daily until at least three criteria of clinical cure are met, allowing the discontinuation of antibiotic therapy in experimental group. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint combining of all-cause mortality measured at day 28, treatment failure or new episode of microbiologically confirmed VAP until day 28.The aim of the study is to demonstrate that a strategy to reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy for VAP based on clinical assessment is safe could lead to changes in practice as part of a personalised therapeutic approach, by reducing exposure to antibiotics and their side effects.

Ethics and dissemination: The ASPIC trial has been approved by the French regulatory agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM; EUDRACT number 2021-002197-78, 19 August 2021) and an independent ethics committee the Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France III (CNRIPH : 21.03.25.60729, 10 October 2021) for the study protocol (version ASPIC-1.3; 03 September 2021) for all study centres. Participant recruitment is scheduled to begin in 2022. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

Trial registration number: NCT05124977.

Keywords: Adult intensive & critical care; Infection control; Respiratory infections.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AF, DB, AB, PE: declare no competing interest. AR: grants from bioMerieux and Merck. IM-L: board on PFIZER, MSD, GILEAD. J-FT directly related to the protocol: none, participation to scientific advisory boards: Pfizer, Gilead, Merck, BD, Shionoghi; readings: Merck, Biomerieux, Pfizer, Shionogi; research grants to my research unit: Thermo Fischer, Pfizer, Merck. J-RZ: consulting fees from MSD, Pfizer, speaker fees from MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, Correvio and Eumedica. EW: Speaker fees from MSD, Akcea therapeutics and LFB, support for attending meeting/travel: LFB and Akcea therapeutics.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General flowchart of the study. VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Criteria of clinical cure and criteria for discontinuation of antibiotic therapy in experimental arm. *Compared to the day of initiation of antibiotic therapy. VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Description of microbiological categories of outcomes in relation to time of occurrence of new episode of VAP after inclusion adapted from Bai et al. VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia.

References

    1. De Waele JJ, Akova M, Antonelli M, et al. . Antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic stewardship programs in the ICU: insistence and persistence in the fight against resistance. A position statement from ESICM/ESCMID/WAAAR round table on multi-drug resistance. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:189–96. 10.1007/s00134-017-5036-1
    1. Ashraf M, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review. Hosp Pract (1995) 2012;40:93–105. 10.3810/hp.2012.02.950
    1. Bergmans DC, Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, et al. . Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;39:527–35. 10.1093/jac/39.4.527
    1. Fihman V, Messika J, Hajage D, et al. . Five-year trends for ventilator-associated pneumonia: correlation between microbiological findings and antimicrobial drug consumption. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015;46:518–25. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.010
    1. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, et al. . Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the infectious diseases Society of America and the Society for healthcare epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:e51–77. 10.1093/cid/ciw118
    1. Dyar OJ, Huttner B, Schouten J, et al. . What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:793–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026
    1. Nicolau DP. Current challenges in the management of the infected patient. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2011;24 Suppl 1:S1–10. 10.1097/01.qco.0000393483.10270.ff
    1. Timsit J-F, Bassetti M, Cremer O, et al. . Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2019;45:172–89. 10.1007/s00134-019-05520-5
    1. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. . Executive summary: management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases Society of America and the American thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:575–82. 10.1093/cid/ciw504
    1. Torres A, Niederman MS, Chastre J, et al. . International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European respiratory society (ERS), European society of intensive care medicine (ESICM), European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) and asociación latinoamericana del Tórax (ALAT). Eur Respir J 2017;50:1700582. 10.1183/13993003.00582-2017
    1. Leone M, Bouadma L, Bouhemad B, et al. . Hospital-acquired pneumonia in ICU. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2018;37:83–98. 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.006
    1. Dimopoulos G, Poulakou G, Pneumatikos IA, et al. . Short- vs long-duration antibiotic regimens for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2013;144:1759–67. 10.1378/chest.13-0076
    1. Pugh R, Grant C, Cooke RPD, et al. . Short-course versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD007577. 10.1002/14651858.CD007577.pub3
    1. Weiss E, Zahar J-R, Alder J, et al. . Elaboration of consensus clinical endpoints to evaluate antimicrobial treatment efficacy in future hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69:1912–8. 10.1093/cid/ciz093
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The third International consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    1. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. . The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. on behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707–10. 10.1007/BF01709751
    1. Evans SR, Rubin D, Follmann D, et al. . Desirability of outcome ranking (door) and response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (radar). Clin Infect Dis 2015;61:800–6. 10.1093/cid/civ495
    1. Torres A, Zhong N, Pachl J, et al. . Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:285–95. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30747-8
    1. Kollef MH, Nováček M, Kivistik Ü, et al. . Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19:1299–311. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30403-7
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors . Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 1997;336:309–15. 10.1056/NEJM199701233360422
    1. Bai AD, Komorowski AS, Lo CKL, et al. . Intention-to-treat analysis may be more conservative than per protocol analysis in antibiotic non-inferiority trials: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21:75. 10.1186/s12874-021-01260-7

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe