Identification and super-resolution imaging of ligand-activated receptor dimers in live cells

Pascale Winckler, Lydia Lartigue, Gregory Giannone, Francesca De Giorgi, François Ichas, Jean-Baptiste Sibarita, Brahim Lounis, Laurent Cognet, Pascale Winckler, Lydia Lartigue, Gregory Giannone, Francesca De Giorgi, François Ichas, Jean-Baptiste Sibarita, Brahim Lounis, Laurent Cognet

Abstract

Molecular interactions are key to many chemical and biological processes like protein function. In many signaling processes they occur in sub-cellular areas displaying nanoscale organizations and involving molecular assemblies. The nanometric dimensions and the dynamic nature of the interactions make their investigations complex in live cells. While super-resolution fluorescence microscopies offer live-cell molecular imaging with sub-wavelength resolutions, they lack specificity for distinguishing interacting molecule populations. Here we combine super-resolution microscopy and single-molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) to identify dimers of receptors induced by ligand binding and provide super-resolved images of their membrane distribution in live cells. By developing a two-color universal-Point-Accumulation-In-the-Nanoscale-Topography (uPAINT) method, dimers of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) activated by EGF are studied at ultra-high densities, revealing preferential cell-edge sub-localization. This methodology which is specifically devoted to the study of molecules in interaction, may find other applications in biological systems where understanding of molecular organization is crucial.

Figures

Figure 1. Live cell super-resolution imaging of…
Figure 1. Live cell super-resolution imaging of functional membrane EGFRs newly activated by their ligand.
(a) Principle of the super-resolution method. Oblique illumination (light green) does not excite EGF ligands in solution. (b) uPAINT image of EGFR labeled by EGF-Atto532 acquired on live cells. (c) Same experiment performed using Panitumumab-Atto647N. (d) Competition assay showing specificity of EGF-Atto532 labeling: number of fluorescent EGF detected per frame (50 ms) on the cell membrane during a uPAINT acquisition using EGF-Atto532. After ~8 s and 38 s (red arrows), unlabeled Panitumumab was added in 100-fold excess (40 nM) compared to EGF.
Figure 2. Live cell super-resolution imaging of…
Figure 2. Live cell super-resolution imaging of membrane EGFR dimers based on single-molecule FRET.
Dual color uPAINT imaging of EGFR was performed using a 1:1 mix of EGF-Atto532 and EGF-Cy5 under 532 nm laser excitation. (a) Schematics of single molecule FRET between two fluorescent ligands bound on a EGFR dimer. (b) Donor channel: super-resolved image of EGFR labeled by EGF-Atto532 as in Fig. 1b. (c) Acceptor channel: super-resolved image of EGF activated dimer EGFRs obtained by single molecule FRET. (d) Signature of single molecule FRET: anti-correlated fluorescence signals detected by single molecule fitting in the donor (green line) and acceptor (red line) channels, in corresponding positions. Insets in (b) and (c) represents zooms of highlighted regions showing preferential cell edge localization of the dimers.
Figure 3. Membrane dynamics of EGFR dimers…
Figure 3. Membrane dynamics of EGFR dimers based on single molecule tracking of the FRET acceptor signals.
(a) and (b) color coded trajectories lasting more than 200 ms found in one of the highlighted regions of Fig. 2b and c respectively. (c) Cumulative distribution of D values obtained on a single cell for EGFR dimers alone (red) and for the entire population of EGFR imaged in the donor channel (green).

References

    1. Hell S. W. Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy. Science 316, 1153–1158 (2007).
    1. Huang B., Bates M. & Zhuang X. Super-Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 993–1016 (2009).
    1. Betzig E. et al. Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006).
    1. Hess S. T., Girirajan T. P. & Mason M. D. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258–4272 (2006).
    1. Rust M. J., Bates M. & Zhuang X. W. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Meth. 3, 793–795 (2006).
    1. Sharonov A. & Hochstrasser R. M. Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes. PNAS 103, 18911–18916 (2006).
    1. Berning S., Willig K. I., Steffens H., Dibaj P. & Hell S. W. Nanoscopy in a Living Mouse Brain. Science 335, 551 (2012).
    1. Manley S. et al. High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy. Nat. Meth. 5, 155 (2008).
    1. Giannone G. et al. Dynamic Superresolution Imaging of Endogenous Proteins on Living Cells at Ultra-High Density. Biophys. J. 99, 1303–1310 (2010).
    1. Williamson D. J. et al. Pre-existing clusters of the adaptor Lat do not participate in early T cell signaling events. Nat. Immunol. 12, 655–662 (2011).
    1. Rossier O. et al. Integrins β1 and β3 exhibit distinct dynamic nanoscale organizations inside focal adhesions. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1057–1067 (2012).
    1. Verveer P. J., Wouters F. S., Reynolds A. R. & Bastiaens P. I. H. Quantitative Imaging of Lateral ErbB1 Receptor Signal Propagation in the Plasma Membrane. Science 290, 1567–1570 (2000).
    1. Diagaradjane P. et al. Imaging Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression In vivo: Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Characterization of a Bioconjugated Quantum Dot Nanoprobe. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 731–741 (2008).
    1. Manning H. C. et al. Molecular Imaging of Therapeutic Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Blockade in Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 7413–7422 (2008).
    1. Nagy P., Claus J., Jovin T. M. & Arndt-Jovin D. J. Distribution of resting and ligand-bound ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinases in living cells using number and brightness analysis. PNAS 107, 16524–16529 (2010).
    1. Sako Y., Minoghchi S. & Yanagida T. Single-molecule imaging of EGFR signalling on the surface of living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 168–172 (2000).
    1. Webb S. E. D. et al. Single-Molecule Imaging and Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy Show Different Structures for High- and Low-Affinity Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors in A431 Cells. Biophys. J. 94, 803–819 (2008).
    1. Chung I. et al. Spatial control of EGF receptor activation by reversible dimerization on living cells. Nature 464, 783–787 (2010).
    1. Kasai R. S. et al. Full characterization of GPCR monomer–dimer dynamic equilibrium by single molecule imaging. J. Cell Biol. 192, 463–480 (2011).
    1. Schmidt-Glenewinkel H., Reinz E., Eils R. & Brady N. R. Systems Biological Analysis of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Internalization Dynamics for Altered Receptor Levels. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 17243–17252 (2009).
    1. Giannone G., Hosy E., Sibarita J.-B., Choquet D. & Cognet L. in Nanoimaging. Vol. 950, Methods Mol. Biol. 95–110 (2013).
    1. Cognet L., Harms S. H., Blab G. A., Lommerse P. H. M. & Schmidt T. Simultaneous ‘dual-color and dual-polarization' imaging of single molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4052–4054 (2000).
    1. Tokunaga M., Imamoto N. & Sakata-Sogawa K. Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells. Nat. Meth. 5, 159–161 (2008).
    1. Saltz L., Easley C. & Kirkpatrick P. Panitumumab. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 5, 987–988 (2006).
    1. Moyle-Heyrman G., Viswanathan R., Widom J. & Auble D. T. Two-step Mechanism for Modifier of Transcription 1 (Mot1) Enzyme-catalyzed Displacement of TATA-binding Protein (TBP) from DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 9002–9012 (2012).
    1. Chibalina M. V., Poliakov A., Kendrick-Jones J. & Buss F. Myosin VI and Optineurin Are Required for Polarized EGFR Delivery and Directed Migration. Traffic 11, 1290–1303 (2010).
    1. Klarlund J. K. Dual modes of motility at the leading edge of migrating epithelial cell sheets. PNAS 109, 15799–15804 (2012).
    1. Takaya A., Ohba Y., Kurokawa K. & Matsuda M. RalA Activation at Nascent Lamellipodia of Epidermal Growth Factor-stimulated Cos7 Cells and Migrating Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2549–2557 (2004).
    1. Nakashima S. et al. Small G protein Ral and its downstream molecules regulate endocytosis of EGF and insulin receptors. EMBO J. 18, 3629–3642 (1999).
    1. Groc L. et al. Surface trafficking of neurotransmitter receptor: Comparison between single-molecule/quantum dot strategies. J. Neurosci. 27, 12433–12437 (2007).
    1. Petrini E. M. et al. Endocytic Trafficking and Recycling Maintain a Pool of Mobile Surface AMPA Receptors Required for Synaptic Potentiation. Neuron 63, 92–105 (2009).
    1. Chen I. & Ting A. Y. Site-specific labeling of proteins with small molecules in live cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 35–40 (2005).
    1. Grunwald C. et al. Quantum-Yield-Optimized Fluorophores for Site-Specific Labeling and Super-Resolution Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 8090–8093 (2011).
    1. Sun X. et al. Development of SNAP-Tag Fluorogenic Probes for Wash-Free Fluorescence Imaging. ChemBioChem 12, 2217–2226 (2011).
    1. Milles S. et al. Click Strategies for Single-Molecule Protein Fluorescence. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 5187–5195 (2012).
    1. Izeddin I. et al. Wavelet analysis for single molecule localization microscopy. Opt. Express 20, 2081–2095 (2012).
    1. Racine V. et al. in 2006 3rd Ieee International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano. Vols 1–3, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 1020–1023 (2006).
    1. Racine V. et al. Visualization and quantification of vesicle trafficking on a three-dimensional cytoskeleton network in living cells. J. Microsc. 225, 214–228 (2007).

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe