Reliability of "Modified timed up and go" test in children with cerebral palsy

Sanjivani N Dhote, Prema A Khatri, Suvarna S Ganvir, Sanjivani N Dhote, Prema A Khatri, Suvarna S Ganvir

Abstract

Background: Timed up and go (TUG) is a quick test used in clinical practice as an outcome measure to assess functional ambulatory mobility or dynamic balance in adults. However, little information is available on TUG test used in cerebral palsy. Hence, the purpose of our study was to assess the intra-rater reliability of TUG test in cerebral palsy children.

Aim and objective: To assess within-session and test-retest reliability after 1 week of TUG test in cerebral palsy children.

Setting and design: It was an a cross-sectional observational study conducted in a neurorehabilitation unit, with 30 cerebral palsy children of 4-12 years, within Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I, II, III, and with an IQ ≥50.The sampling technique used was purposive sampling excluding children with cognitive deficit.

Materials and methods: Subjects performed TUG on three occasions - Initial assessment (time 1), 30 min after initial assessment (time 2), and 1 week after initial assessment (time 3). Three trails were conducted for each of the three occasions. The mean score of three trials was documented as the final score. Within-session and test-retest reliability were analyzed using scores of time 1 and 2, and time 1 and 3, respectively.

Statistical analysis: The documented data were analyzed for within-session and test-retest reliability after 1 week of TUG test by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: Reliability of TUG test was high, with ICC of 0.99 for within-session reliability and 0.99 for test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: Intra-rater reliability of TUG test in cerebral palsy children was found to be high.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy; intra-rater reliability; timed up and go test.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1
Age and gender wise distribution of subjects
Graph 2
Graph 2
Within-session reliability of “timed up and go test” (using time 1 and time 2)
Graph 3
Graph 3
Test–retest reliability of “timed up and go test” (using time 1 and time 3)

References

    1. Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, Kodama K, Perat MV. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:547–51.
    1. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC. The incidence of cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:417–23.
    1. Nelson KB. Can we prevent cerebral palsy? N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1765–9.
    1. Kuban KC, Leviton A. Cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 1994;33:188–95.
    1. Takarini NT, Williams EN, Denehy L. TUG in Indonesian children. Paper presented at the World Confederation of Physical Therapists Congress, Barcelona. 2003 Jun 2-12th;
    1. Andersson C, Grooten W, Hellsten M, Kaping K, Mattson E. Adults with cerebral palsy: Walking ability after progressive strength training. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:220–8.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘up and go’: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8.
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000;80:896–903.
    1. Habib Z, Westcott S. Assessment of anthropometric factors on balance tests in children. Ped Phys Ther. 1998;10:101–9.
    1. Habib Z, Westcott S, Valvano J. Assessment of balance abilities in Pakistani children: a cultural perspective. Ped Phys Ther. 1999;11:73–82.
    1. Williams EN, Carroll SR. The timed up-and-go test in normal children of different ages. Paper presented at the National Paediatric Physiotherapy Conference, Sydney, Australia. 1999 Sep 7-10th;
    1. World Health Organization. WHO family of international classifications. 2001. [accessed 10th May 2005].
    1. Morris S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Reliability of measurements obtained with the timed ‘up & go’ test in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2001;81:810–8.
    1. Galea MP, Phillips BA, et al. Investigation of the timed ‘Up & Go’ test in children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2005;47:518–24.
    1. Van der Weel FR, Van der Meer AL, Lee DN. Effect of task on movement control in cerebral palsy: Implications for assessment and therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33:419–26.
    1. Alison Cargeeg AM. Blackmore, Effects of circuit training for adolescents and young adults with spastic diplegia in pediatric physical therapy. 2008;20:1–18.
    1. Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Keren O, Meyer S. Functional balance tests for children with traumatic brain injury: Within-session reliability. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008;20:254–8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe