Yoga in adult cancer: a pilot survey of attitudes and beliefs among oncologists

M C McCall, A Ward, C Heneghan, M C McCall, A Ward, C Heneghan

Abstract

Background: Depending on interest, knowledge, and skills, oncologists are adapting clinical behaviour to include integrative approaches, supporting patients to make informed complementary care decisions. The present study sought to improve the knowledge base in three ways: Test the acceptability of a self-reported online survey for oncologists.Provide preliminary data collection concerning knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and current referral practices among oncologists with respect to yoga in adult cancer.List the perceived benefits of and barriers to yoga intervention from a clinical perspective.

Methods: A 38-item self-report questionnaire was administered online to medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists in British Columbia.

Results: Some of the 29 oncologists who completed the survey (n = 10) reported having recommended yoga to patients to improve physical activity, fatigue, stress, insomnia, and muscle or joint stiffness. Other responding oncologists were hesitant or unlikely to suggest yoga for their patients because they had no knowledge of yoga as a therapy (n = 15) or believed that scientific evidence to support its use is lacking (n = 11). All 29 respondents would recommend that their patients participate in a clinical trial to test the efficacy of yoga. In qualitative findings, oncologists compared yoga with exercise and suggested that it might have similar psychological and physical health benefits that would improve patient capacity to endure treatment. Barriers to and limitations of yoga in adult cancer are also discussed.

Conclusions: An online self-report survey is feasible, but has response rate limitations. A small number of oncologists are currently recommending yoga to improve health-related outcomes in adult cancer. Respondents would support clinical yoga interventions to improve the evidence base in cancer patients, including men and women in all tumour groups.

Keywords: Yoga; cam; oncologists; surveys.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Participant flow diagram.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Wordle diagram of the views of oncologists about yoga.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Beliefs reported by responding oncologists about the effects of yoga in adult cancer patients.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Characteristics and attitudes toward yoga of the responding oncologists.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. globocan 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide in 2012 [Web resource] Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. Ver 1.0.
    1. World Health Organization (who) Fact sheet 297. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014. Cancer [Web page] [Available at: ; cited February 25, 2014]
    1. Deng GE, Frenkel M, Cohen L, et al. on behalf of the Society for Integrative Oncology Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for integrative oncology: complementary therapies and botanicals. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2009;7:85–120.
    1. Molassiotis A, Fernadez–Ortega P, Pud D, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:655–63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi110.
    1. Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11:187–203. doi: 10.1177/1534735411423920.
    1. Brazier AS, Balneaves LG, Seely D, Stephen JE, Suryaprakash N, Taylor–Brown JW. Integrative practices of Canadian oncology health professionals. Curr Oncol. 2008;15(suppl 2):S110.es87–91. doi: 10.3747/co.v15i0.283.
    1. Sewitch MJ, Cepoiu M, Rigillo N, Sproule D. A literature review of health care professional attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Complement Health Pract Rev. 2008;13:139–54.
    1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382–5. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.
    1. McCall MC. In search of yoga: research trends in a Western medical database. Int J Yoga. 2013;7:4–8. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.123470.
    1. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.
    1. Slocum–Gori S, Howard AF, Balneaves LG, Kazanjian A. Investigating the perceived feasibility of integrative medicine in a conventional oncology setting: yoga therapy as a treatment for breast cancer survivors. Integr Cancer Ther. 2013;12:103–12. doi: 10.1177/1534735412443851.
    1. Andrews D, Nonnecke B, Preece J. Electronic survey methodology: a case study in reaching hard-to-involve internet users. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2003;16:185–210. doi: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602_04.
    1. Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R, editors. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
    1. Pit SW, Hansen V, Ewald D. A small unconditional non- financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (gps): a randomised controlled trial study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-108.
    1. Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London, UK: Sage; 2013.
    1. Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Paul A, Michalsen A, Dobos G. Predictors of yoga use among internal medicine patients. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-172.
    1. Yoga Journal Yoga JournalReleases 2012 Yoga in America Market Study [press release]. Daytona Beach, FL: Yoga Journal; 2012[Available online at: ; cited December 21, 2013]
    1. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (nccam) Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name? [Web page] Bethesda, MD: NCCAM; 2013. [Available at: ; cited January 28, 2014]
    1. World Health Organization (who) Health topics: Physical activity [Web page] Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014. [Available at: ; cited January 18, 2014]

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe